hessukessu
Kenraali
Katsokaa tämä ja miettikää kaksi kertaa, kuulostaako tutulta?
http://youtu.be/kfQiy0_6BIo
http://youtu.be/kfQiy0_6BIo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hessukessu kirjoitti:Katsokaa tämä ja miettikää kaksi kertaa, kuulostaako tutulta?
http://youtu.be/kfQiy0_6BIo
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/06/20/194513/obamas-crackdown-views-leaks-as.htmlEven before a former U.S. intelligence contractor exposed the secret collection of Americans’ phone records, the Obama administration was pressing a government-wide crackdown on security threats that requires federal employees to keep closer tabs on their co-workers and exhorts managers to punish those who fail to report their suspicions.
President Barack Obama’s unprecedented initiative, known as the Insider Threat Program, is sweeping in its reach. It has received scant public attention even though it extends beyond the U.S. national security bureaucracies to most federal departments and agencies nationwide, including the Peace Corps, the Social Security Administration and the Education and Agriculture departments. It emphasizes leaks of classified material, but catchall definitions of “insider threat” give agencies latitude to pursue and penalize a range of other conduct.
Government documents reviewed by McClatchy illustrate how some agencies are using that latitude to pursue unauthorized disclosures of any information, not just classified material. They also show how millions of federal employees and contractors must watch for “high-risk persons or behaviors” among co-workers and could face penalties, including criminal charges, for failing to report them. Leaks to the media are equated with espionage.
“Hammer this fact home . . . leaking is tantamount to aiding the enemies of the United States,” says a June 1, 2012, Defense Department strategy for the program that was obtained by McClatchy
Tvälups kirjoitti:Melko epäturvallinen auto tuo Hastingsin MB: Kolari puun kanssa = moottori lentää yli 50m päähän ja auto syttyy räjähdyksenomaisesti tuleen.
Jokusen kolarin nähneenä (ja tehneenä) ei ole vastaavaa osunut kohdalle halvemmilla automerkeillä.
Eräs moottori saatiin irti ja lentoon n.100m etäisyydelle, mutta sen alla olikin 6kg penoa...
Tvälups kirjoitti:Nyt kun revit tuon narsismin(?) kehiin niin suosittelen katsomaan tämän:
Jk http://henrymakow.com/pat_tillman_-_hero_or_dupe.html
-tämäkin keissi kannattaa muistaa kun pohdiskelee mitä tuossa maassa tapahtuu (vaikkakin Tillman sai surmansa Afgoissa)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-23/u-s-surveillance-is-not-aimed-at-terrorists.htmlThe debate over the U.S. government’s monitoring of digital communications suggests that Americans are willing to allow it as long as it is genuinely targeted at terrorists. What they fail to realize is that the surveillance systems are best suited for gathering information on law-abiding citizens.
People concerned with online privacy tend to calm down when told that the government can record their calls or read their e-mail only under special circumstances and with proper court orders. The assumption is that they have nothing to worry about unless they are terrorists or correspond with the wrong people.
The infrastructure set up by the National Security Agency, however, may only be good for gathering information on the stupidest, lowest-ranking of terrorists. The Prism surveillance program focuses on access to the servers of America’s largest Internet companies, which support such popular services as Skype, Gmail and iCloud. These are not the services that truly dangerous elements typically use.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/06/the-public-doesnt-believe-the-nsa-knows-whats-really-going-on-with-mass-spying.html72% of Likely U.S. Voters Know the NSA Has Monitored the Private Communications of Congress, Military Leaders and Judges
The government keeps on lying about how it’s spying on Americans without authorization from a court.
It keeps lying about the scope of its spying.
It keeps lying about the need for mass surveillance (and here) and the way that the information gained from spying will really be used … to harass political opponents.
Indeed, NSA...
America's NSA intelligence service allegedly targeted the European Union with its spying activities. According to SPIEGEL information, the US placed bugs in the EU representation in Washington and infiltrated its computer network. Cyber attacks were also perpetrated against Brussels in New York and Washington.
Information obtained by SPIEGEL shows that America's National Security Agency (NSA) not only conducted online surveillance of European citizens, but also appears to have specifically targeted buildings housing European Union institutions. The information appears in secret documents obtained by whistleblower Edward Snowden that SPIEGEL has in part seen. A "top secret" 2010 document describes how the secret service attacked the EU's diplomatic representation in Washington.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/29/european-private-data-america#start-of-commentsAt least six European Union countries in addition to Britain have been colluding with the US over the mass harvesting of personal communications data, according to a former contractor to America's National Security Agency, who said the public should not be "kept in the dark".
Wayne Madsen, a former US navy lieutenant who first worked for the NSA in 1985 and over the next 12 years held several sensitive positions within the agency, names Denmark, the Netherlands, France, Germany, Spain and Italy as having secret deals with the US.
Madsen said the countries had "formal second and third party status" under signal intelligence (Sigint) agreements that compels them to hand over data, including mobile phone and internet information to the NSA if requested.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/06/26/195045/memories-of-stasi-color-germans.htmlWolfgang Schmidt was seated in Berlin’s 1,200-foot-high TV tower, one of the few remaining landmarks left from the former East Germany. Peering out over the city that lived in fear when the communist party ruled it, he pondered the magnitude of domestic spying in the United States under the Obama administration. A smile spread across his face.
“You know, for us, this would have been a dream come true,” he said, recalling the days when he was a lieutenant colonel in the defunct communist country’s secret police, the Stasi.
In those days, his department was limited to tapping 40 phones at a time, he recalled. Decide to spy on a new victim and an old one had to be dropped, because of a lack of equipment. He finds breathtaking the idea that the U.S. government receives daily reports on the cellphone usage of millions of Americans and can monitor the Internet traffic of millions more.
“So much information, on so many people,” he said.
East Germany’s Stasi has long been considered the standard of police state surveillance during the Cold War years, a monitoring regime so vile and so intrusive that agents even noted when their subjects were overheard engaging in sexual intercourse. Against that backdrop, Germans have greeted with disappointment, verging on anger, the news that somewhere in a U.S. government databank are the records of where millions of people were when they made phone calls or what video content they streamed on their computers in the privacy of their homes.
Even Schmidt, 73, who headed one of the more infamous departments in the infamous Stasi, called himself appalled. The dark side to gathering such a broad, seemingly untargeted, amount of information is obvious, he said.
“It is the height of naivete to think that once collected this information won’t be used,” he said. “This is the nature of secret government organizations. The only way to protect the people’s privacy is not to allow the government to collect their information in the first place.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/28/senators-james-clapper-nsa-data-collectionThe senators said they were seeking public answers to the following questions in order to give the American people the information they need to conduct an informed public debate. The specific questions include:
* How long has the NSA used Patriot Act authorities to engage in bulk collection of Americans’ records? Was this collection underway when the law was reauthorized in 2006?
* Has the NSA used USA Patriot Act authorities to conduct bulk collection of any other types of records pertaining to Americans, beyond phone records?
* Has the NSA collected or made any plans to collect Americans’ cell-site location data in bulk?
* Have there been any violations of the court orders permitting this bulk collection, or of the rules governing access to these records? If so, please describe these violations.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/30/nsa-leaks-us-bugging-european-alliesUS intelligence services are spying on the European Union mission in New York and its embassy in Washington, according to the latest top secret US National Security Agency documents leaked by the whistleblower Edward Snowden.
One document lists 38 embassies and missions, describing them as "targets". It details an extraordinary range of spying methods used against each target, from bugs implanted in electronic communications gear to taps into cables to the collection of transmissions with specialised antennae.
Along with traditional ideological adversaries and sensitive Middle Eastern countries, the list of targets includes the EU missions and the French, Italian and Greek embassies, as well as a number of other American allies, including Japan, Mexico, South Korea, India and Turkey.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/07/02/edward_snowden_releases_statement_from_russia/Fugitive NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden has released a statement, published by WikiLeaks, that excoriates President Obama, essentially calls him a liar, and says that the administration is not afraid of leakers like him, but of us.
"On Thursday," Snowden writes, "President Obama declared before the world that he would not permit any diplomatic 'wheeling and dealing' over my case," referring to Obama's comment in Senegal that "I'm not going to have one case with a suspect who we're trying to extradite suddenly be elevated to the point where I've got to start doing wheeling and dealing and trading on a whole host of other issues, simply to get a guy extradited so he can face the justice system."
Snowden doesn't specifically use the "L" word, but he makes it clear that he believes Obama is not a man of his word. "Yet now it is being reported," he says, "that after promising not to do so, the President ordered his Vice President to pressure the leaders of nations from which I have requested protection to deny my asylum petitions.
"This kind of deception from a world leader is not justice, and neither is the extralegal penalty of exile," Snowden concludes.
The extralegality to which Snowden refers includes the fact that "Although I am convicted of nothing, [the Obama administration] has unilaterally revoked my passport, leaving me a stateless person," he writes.
The reason the administration is going out of its way to make life tough for him, he says, is not that it fears him – he groups himself with Bradley Manning and former NSA exec-turned-whistleblower Thomas Drake – but that it fears the US citizenry rising up in anger.
"The Obama administration is afraid of you," he writes. "It is afraid of an informed, angry public demanding the constitutional government it was promised – and it should be."
One person whom Snowden might be wise to fear – or at minimum to keep a wary eye on – would be Russian president Vladamir Putin. On Monday, Putin said that Russia would not turn Snowden over to US authorities, but that "If he wants to stay here, there is one condition: He must stop his work aimed at harming our American partners, as strange as that sounds coming from my lips."
Of course, Putin will be the sole definer of the bounds of that stricture. Should he decide that a Snowden statement or intelligence release is harmful to the US, there will be no avenue of appeal.
Putin, however, sounded almost wistful about ridding Russia and himself of the annoyance that is Snowden. Should the troublesome whistleblower want to continue his leaky ways and "be a human rights activist," Putin said, "he must choose a country of destination and go there." ®
Tvälups kirjoitti:Breiking news, sanoisin:
EMERCOM of Russia → News 26 June 11:32
Several documents signed during joint work of Russian Emergency Ministry and FEMA
http://en.mchs.ru/news/item/434203/
The Russian Emergency Situations Ministry and the USA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) are going to exchange experts during joint rescue operations in major disasters. This is provided by a protocol of the fourth meeting of the U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission Working Group on Emergency Situations and seventeenth meeting of Joint U.S.-Russia Cooperation Committee on Emergency Situations, which took place in Washington on 25 June.
The document provides for expert cooperation in disaster response operations and to study the latest practices.
In addition, the parties approved of U.S.-Russian cooperation in this field in 2013-2014, which envisages exchange of experience including in monitoring and forecasting emergency situations, training of rescuers, development of mine-rescuing and provision of security at mass events.
At the end of the meeting the parties expressed their satisfaction with the level of cooperation between the Russian Federation and the United States in the area of emergency prevention and response and agreed to develop it in order to respond efficiently to all kinds of disasters.
http://www.infowars.com/russian-forces-to-provide-security-at-us-events/
http://www.beaufortobserver.net/Articles-NEWS-and-COMMENTARY-c-2013-07-01-267661.112112-Obama-allows-armed-foreign-troops-in-America.html