Fitzal Al-Qassemilta (ukolla vaivaiset 6,6 miljoonaa twitter-seuraajaa) näkemystä toiselta puolelta ennaltaehkäisevän iskun merkittävyydestä:
Al-Qassem on aiemmin ottanut mielenkiintoisesti kantaa kuinka näkee outona ajatuksen, että arabimaiden pitäisi kritiikittä kilpajuosta tukemaan palestiinalaisten kulloistakin faktiota. Toteaa vielä, että Syyria on tappanut palestiinalaisia jopa enemmän kuin Israel. Ja onko arabien etu tukea niin selvästi Iranin ohjailemaa projektia?
What happened today to Hezbollah can be classified as the largest preemptive strike in modern history, and can be compared to the strike that Israel previously directed against the Egyptian air force before the 1967 war.
Today, Hezbollah has thousands of wounded leaders and members. If it entered a war today, its wounded would not find a single bed in any Lebanese hospital because the hospitals are now crowded with the injured. What's worse is that it has lost the most important means of security and military communication. Checkmate
Al-Qassem on aiemmin ottanut mielenkiintoisesti kantaa kuinka näkee outona ajatuksen, että arabimaiden pitäisi kritiikittä kilpajuosta tukemaan palestiinalaisten kulloistakin faktiota. Toteaa vielä, että Syyria on tappanut palestiinalaisia jopa enemmän kuin Israel. Ja onko arabien etu tukea niin selvästi Iranin ohjailemaa projektia?
Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The Arabs have never been stingy on the Palestinian cause, they have supported it with billions over decades, especially the Gulf States, and most Arab countries have supported the Palestine Liberation Organization in international forums, with the exception of the Syrian regime, which killed more Palestinians than Israel, especially in the massacres in Lebanon and then in the Yarmouk camp in Damascus.
With the exception of Egypt, no Arab country normalized its relations with Israel until after the Palestinians normalized and signed peace treaties with the Israelis, so you cannot say that the Arabs conspired against the Palestinian cause. If the (Palestinian) judge is satisfied with the peace option, why do you want the Arabs to be more royalist than the king? The Arabs were and still are with the legitimate and sole representative of the Palestinian people, so you cannot say that they betrayed the cause simply because they did not support the Palestinian movements that rebelled against the Palestinian Authority.
Why is it that whenever a new Palestinian faction wants to put forward a new slogan with external support and incitement, some people start asking the Arabs and blackmailing them to support this faction? Are the Arabs just banks and do not have their own issues to pay and support this or that faction and follow it whenever it proposes new projects with external incitement, and if they do not do so, they become conspirators against the issue? Also, is it in the interest of the Arabs to follow movements that Iran exploits for its own projects in the region?
Viimeksi muokattu: