Salaliitot
- Viestiketjun aloittaja Myrskyhiiri
- Aloitus PVM
Mitä varten niitä pitää kuljetella tunneleissa? Eikö C-130 olisi huomattavasti huokeampi vaihtoehto tuollaiseen hommaan?
tulikomento
Supreme Leader
Mielestäni toimittajilla olisi velvollisuus kertoa täällä meilläkii tollaisesta asiasta. Mut ei oo vastaan tullut.juttua Aatun kolmas valtakunta -projektista ja sen perään lyhyt pätkä WEF:stä jonka jäseniä useampi EU:n keulahahmo on.
WEF:n Great Reset tavoitteesta mainitaan
"Talouselämän nollaus, joka saa ihmiset riippuvaisiksi valtiosta ja korporaatioista on vain osa WEF:n ja Schwabin visioista. Teknokraattinen ”unelma” on luoda uusi transhumaani ihminen, ’”curious mixes of digital-and-analog life”, tekniikan ja ihmisruumiin omalaatuinen yhdistelmä."
Jos EU-komission jäsenet valittaisiin vaaleilla tuskin EU:ta rakennettaisiin tuolle ajatukselle.
Tiedä historiasi - älä anna sen toistaa itseään
Ei Hitler mennyt tankkien avulla Itävaltaan. Ensimmäiseksi Hitler valittiin valtaan 98% äänivyöryllä, koska Hitler antoi ihmisille tasa-arvon. Loppu onkin historiaa.injektiopiikki.com
rty19
Greatest Leader
Great Reset: Covid Makes the Rich Even Richer, Destroys the Middle Class (Video) - RAIR
Self-proclaimed philanthropists like Bill Gates and the pharmaceutical industry are the big winners of the crisis.
rairfoundation.com
Great Reset: Covid Makes the Rich Even Richer, Destroys the Middle Class (Video) - RAIR
Self-proclaimed philanthropists like Bill Gates and the pharmaceutical industry are the big winners of the crisis.
Ylellä ja muilla ei oo tainnu juttua olla ainakaa et vanhemmatkin saisivat tietoa
rty19
Greatest Leader
Tämä on salaliitto-puolella kun mistä sen tietää mikä osa on totta. Mutta jos EU-maiden pääministereistä asti päättäjiä mukana tuossa WEF:ssä niin tuskin ne haluavat alkuvaiheessa liialti kertoa kansalaisille mitä on tekeillä. Ajan kuluessa se sitten selviää.
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Dr. Vladimir Zelenski (hoiti hydroksiklorokiinilla ihmisiä ekana ja vinkkasi siitä Trumpillekin, joka levitti sanomaa) puhuu rokotteiden roolista ihmisten tag:äämisessä uutta uljasta maailmaa varten.
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/01/16/new-world-order-slave-system.aspx
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/01/16/new-world-order-slave-system.aspx
tulikomento
Supreme Leader
Jaana Kavonius vaatii kuolemantuomiot Sauli Niinistölle, maan hallitukselle, terveydenhuoltoviranomaisille ja kansainvälisille rokotevalmistajafirmoille. Noin niinku alkajaisiksi. 
tulikomento
Supreme Leader
tulikomento
Supreme Leader
Taiteilija Anne "Linduska" Lindellin ennusteet ovat aina menneet 100 % putkeen, kuten mm. Trumpin 2020 vaalivoitto ja Ossi Tiihosen valinta PS:n puheenjohtajaksi.
tulikomento
Supreme Leader
Kajaanistakin löytynyt Q-tunneleita. Jokohan tunnelilapset on pelastettu pedofiilien kynsistä ?
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Joseph Mercola referoi UK MOD:n ja Bundeswehrin idiksiä ihmisten upgrade:aamisesta ja hokaa että nehän sopii yhteen Klasun idiksien kanssa kuin paita ja peppu.
February 14, 2022
The report, “Human Augmentation — The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project,”1 reviews the scientific goals of the U.K. and German defense ministries, and they are precisely what the title suggests. Human augmentation is stressed as being a key area to focus on in order to win future wars.
But human augmentation will not be restricted to the military ranks. It’s really a way to further separate classes of humans, with the rich and powerful elite being augmented “super-humans.” It’s worth noting that anything released to the public is a decade or more behind current capabilities, so everything in this report can be considered dated news, even though it reads like pure science fiction.
WEF has been at the center of global affairs for more than 40 years, and if you take the time to dive into WEF’s Fourth Industrial Revolution material, you realize that it’s all about transhumanism. It’s about the merger of man and machine. This is a dystopian future WEF and its global allies are actively trying to implement, whether humanity at large agrees with it or not.
Schwab dreams of a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their own brains. This, of course, also means that your brain would be accessible to people who might like to tinker with your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior, be they the technocratic elite themselves or random hackers. As noted by history professor Yuval Noah Harari in late 2019, “humans are now hackable animals.”3
As noted in the featured report:4
Key words I’d like to draw your attention to is the affirmation that human augmentation can “directly enhance behavior.” Now, if you can enhance behavior, that means you can change someone’s behavior. And if you can change a person’s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person’s own detriment.
Theoretically, absolutely anyone, any random civilian with a brain-to-cloud connection and the needed biological augmentation (such as strength or speed) could be given wireless instructions to carry out an assassination, for example, and pull it off flawlessly, even without prior training.
Alternatively, their physical body could temporarily be taken over by a remote operator with the prerequisite skills. Proof of concept already exists, and is reviewed by Dr. Charles Morgan, professor in the department of national security at the University of New Haven, in the lecture below. Using the internet and brain implants, thoughts can be transferred from one person to another. The sender can also directly influence the physical movements of the receiver.
They also point out that, from a defense perspective, methods to de-augment an augmented opponent will be needed. Can you even imagine the battlefield of the future, where soldiers are barraged from both sides with conflicting inputs?
As for ethics, the paper stresses that “we cannot wait for the ethics of human augmentation to be decided for us.” There may even be “moral obligations” to augment people, they say, such as when it would “promote well-being” or protect a population from a “novel threat.”
Interestingly, the paper notes that “It could be argued that treatments involving novel vaccination processes and gene and cell therapies are examples of human augmentation already in the pipeline.” This appears to be a direct reference to mRNA and vector DNA COVID jabs. If so, it’s an open admission that they are a human augmentation strategy in progress.
Still, none of that is cause to reconsider or slow down the march toward transhumanism, according to the authors. We just need to understand the human body better, and for that, we need to collect and analyze more data on human performance, behavior, genetics and epigenetics. As noted by the authors:
Up until then, the rule had been that no human embryo could be grown in a lab environment beyond 14 days. Human embryos may now be grown beyond 14 days if certain conditions are met. In some countries, laws would still need to be changed to go beyond 14 days, but regardless, there’s no doubt that as transhumanism gets underway in earnest, ethical considerations about growing babies in laboratories will be tossed out.
Combine the announcement of an AI robot nanny to care for lab-grown embryos with the 2018 announcement that Chinese scientists were creating CRISPR gene-edited babies. As reported by Technology Review, November 25, 2018,9 “A daring effort is underway to create the first children whose DNA has been tailored using gene editing.”
The embryos were genetically edited to disable a gene called CCR5, to make the babies “resistant to HIV, smallpox and cholera.” The embryos were then implanted into a human mother using in vitro fertilization. At the time, the lead scientist refused to answer whether the undertaking had resulted in a live birth, but shortly thereafter it was confirmed that one trial participant had indeed given birth to gene-edited twins in November 2018.10
In June 2019, Nature magazine published an article11 questioning whether the CRISPR babies might inadvertently have been given a shorter life span, as research had recently discovered that people with two disabled copies of the CCR5 gene were 21% more likely to die before the age of 76 than those with one functioning copy of that gene. The babies might also be more susceptible to influenza and autoimmune conditions, thanks to this genetic tinkering.
The hybrid embryos are part of an effort to find new ways to produce organs for transplant patients. The idea is to raise monkeys with human-compatible organs that can then be harvested as needed. Here, the embryos were grown in test tubes for as long as 20 days — and this was done before the ISSCR officially agreed to relaxing the 14-day rule.
The question is, if this kind of research ends up being successful, and the creation of animals with human organs is actually feasible, at what point does the chimera become a human?
How do we know that what looks like a monkey doesn’t have a human brain, with the intelligence that goes with it? Taking it a step further, even, what’s to prevent scientists from growing human organ donors? Human clones, even? It’s a slippery slope, for sure.
The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact CheckedFebruary 14, 2022
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- The U.K. Ministry of Defense and the German Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning Human stress that human augmentation needs to be a key area of focus to win future wars
- Human augmentation will not be restricted to the military ranks. It’s really a way to further separate classes of humans, with the rich and powerful elite eventually using their augmented “super-human” status as justification to rule everyone else
- The goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution — introduced and pushed by the World Economic Forum — is transhumanism, the merging of man with machine
- Human augmentation can directly affect behavior, either positively or to the detriment of that person
- In the transhumanist view, the human body is a “platform” that can be augmented in myriad ways, physically, psychologically and socially
The report, “Human Augmentation — The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project,”1 reviews the scientific goals of the U.K. and German defense ministries, and they are precisely what the title suggests. Human augmentation is stressed as being a key area to focus on in order to win future wars.
But human augmentation will not be restricted to the military ranks. It’s really a way to further separate classes of humans, with the rich and powerful elite being augmented “super-humans.” It’s worth noting that anything released to the public is a decade or more behind current capabilities, so everything in this report can be considered dated news, even though it reads like pure science fiction.
Changing What It Means To Be Human
As noted in the report, “Human augmentation has the potential to ... change the meaning of what it means to be a human.” This is precisely what Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), has stated is the goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution.2WEF has been at the center of global affairs for more than 40 years, and if you take the time to dive into WEF’s Fourth Industrial Revolution material, you realize that it’s all about transhumanism. It’s about the merger of man and machine. This is a dystopian future WEF and its global allies are actively trying to implement, whether humanity at large agrees with it or not.
Schwab dreams of a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their own brains. This, of course, also means that your brain would be accessible to people who might like to tinker with your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior, be they the technocratic elite themselves or random hackers. As noted by history professor Yuval Noah Harari in late 2019, “humans are now hackable animals.”3
As noted in the featured report:4
Key words I’d like to draw your attention to is the affirmation that human augmentation can “directly enhance behavior.” Now, if you can enhance behavior, that means you can change someone’s behavior. And if you can change a person’s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person’s own detriment.
Theoretically, absolutely anyone, any random civilian with a brain-to-cloud connection and the needed biological augmentation (such as strength or speed) could be given wireless instructions to carry out an assassination, for example, and pull it off flawlessly, even without prior training.
Alternatively, their physical body could temporarily be taken over by a remote operator with the prerequisite skills. Proof of concept already exists, and is reviewed by Dr. Charles Morgan, professor in the department of national security at the University of New Haven, in the lecture below. Using the internet and brain implants, thoughts can be transferred from one person to another. The sender can also directly influence the physical movements of the receiver.
The Human Platform
On page 12 of the report, the concept of the human body as a platform is described, and how various parts of the human platform can be augmented. For example:- Physical performance such as strength, dexterity, speed and endurance can be enhanced, as well as physical senses. One example given is gene editing for enhanced sight
- Psychological performance such as cognition, emotion and motivation can be influenced to activate and direct desired behavior. Examples of cognitive augmentation include improving memory, attention, alertness, creativity, understanding, decision-making, intelligence and vigilance
- Social performance — “the ability to perceive oneself as part of a group and the readiness to act as part of the team” — can be influenced. Communication skills, collaboration and trust are also included here
They also point out that, from a defense perspective, methods to de-augment an augmented opponent will be needed. Can you even imagine the battlefield of the future, where soldiers are barraged from both sides with conflicting inputs?
As for ethics, the paper stresses that “we cannot wait for the ethics of human augmentation to be decided for us.” There may even be “moral obligations” to augment people, they say, such as when it would “promote well-being” or protect a population from a “novel threat.”
Interestingly, the paper notes that “It could be argued that treatments involving novel vaccination processes and gene and cell therapies are examples of human augmentation already in the pipeline.” This appears to be a direct reference to mRNA and vector DNA COVID jabs. If so, it’s an open admission that they are a human augmentation strategy in progress.
The Challenge of Unintended Consequences
Of course, there can be any number of side effects and unintended outcomes when you start augmenting an aspect of the human body or mind. As explained in the featured report:Still, none of that is cause to reconsider or slow down the march toward transhumanism, according to the authors. We just need to understand the human body better, and for that, we need to collect and analyze more data on human performance, behavior, genetics and epigenetics. As noted by the authors:
Lab-Grown Designer Babies
As mentioned, by the time a technological advancement is admitted publicly, the research is already a decade or more down the road. Consider, then, the February 1, 2022, article in Futurism,5 which announced that Chinese scientists have developed an artificial intelligence nanny robot to care for fetuses grown inside an artificial womb. According to Futurism:6As of now, the AI robot is only in charge of lab-raised animal embryos, as “experimentation on human embryos is still forbidden under international law.” However, that could change at any time. In May 2021, the International Society for Stem Cell Research went ahead and relaxed the rules7 on human embryonic experimentation.8
Up until then, the rule had been that no human embryo could be grown in a lab environment beyond 14 days. Human embryos may now be grown beyond 14 days if certain conditions are met. In some countries, laws would still need to be changed to go beyond 14 days, but regardless, there’s no doubt that as transhumanism gets underway in earnest, ethical considerations about growing babies in laboratories will be tossed out.
Combine the announcement of an AI robot nanny to care for lab-grown embryos with the 2018 announcement that Chinese scientists were creating CRISPR gene-edited babies. As reported by Technology Review, November 25, 2018,9 “A daring effort is underway to create the first children whose DNA has been tailored using gene editing.”
The embryos were genetically edited to disable a gene called CCR5, to make the babies “resistant to HIV, smallpox and cholera.” The embryos were then implanted into a human mother using in vitro fertilization. At the time, the lead scientist refused to answer whether the undertaking had resulted in a live birth, but shortly thereafter it was confirmed that one trial participant had indeed given birth to gene-edited twins in November 2018.10
In June 2019, Nature magazine published an article11 questioning whether the CRISPR babies might inadvertently have been given a shorter life span, as research had recently discovered that people with two disabled copies of the CCR5 gene were 21% more likely to die before the age of 76 than those with one functioning copy of that gene. The babies might also be more susceptible to influenza and autoimmune conditions, thanks to this genetic tinkering.
Should We Breed Chimeras to Satisfy Need for Organs?
Ethical considerations about animal-human hybrids (chimeras) will probably also fall by the wayside once transhumanism becomes normalized. Already, human-monkey hybrid embryos have been grown by a team of Chinese and American scientists.12The hybrid embryos are part of an effort to find new ways to produce organs for transplant patients. The idea is to raise monkeys with human-compatible organs that can then be harvested as needed. Here, the embryos were grown in test tubes for as long as 20 days — and this was done before the ISSCR officially agreed to relaxing the 14-day rule.
The question is, if this kind of research ends up being successful, and the creation of animals with human organs is actually feasible, at what point does the chimera become a human?
How do we know that what looks like a monkey doesn’t have a human brain, with the intelligence that goes with it? Taking it a step further, even, what’s to prevent scientists from growing human organ donors? Human clones, even? It’s a slippery slope, for sure.
Privacy in the Age of Transhumanism
Perhaps one of the greatest concerns I (and many others) have is that not only are we moving toward a merger of man and machine, but at the same time we’re also increasingly outsourcing human morality to machines. I cannot imagine the end result being anything but devastating. How did that happen? Timandra Harkness, a BBC Radio presenter and author of “Big Data: Does Size Matter?” writes:13
ILoveEU
Kenraali
Ottamatta kantaa mihinkään linkkien juttuihin, niin täytyy muistuttaa, että tavalliselle kaduntallaajalle on olemassa tuotakin tutumpi henkilö, joka oli myös transhumanisti: Jeffrey Epstein.
Tyyppi palvoi ideologiaa ja rahoitti avokätisesti siihen liittyvää tutkimusta. Tänäkin päivänä on vielä olemassa transhumanismin sanomaa levittäviä konsulttifirmoja, joita Epstein rahoitti.
Suomen eduskunta on jopa tuottanut rapsan, missä nostetaan nämä transhumanistit esille. En muista oliko mainittu Epsteinin firmat. Rivienvälistä pystyy kuitenkin lukemaan, että rapsan tuottaneet virkamiehet pitävät näitä hulluina. Suoraan sitä ei sanota. Erikseen, jopa Suomen kirkko on laatinut oman selonteon tästä ilmiöstä ja vertaa sitä suoraan Hitlerin ideologiaan.
Yritän (myös) vähän sanoa, että itse lukematta ei kannata heti uskoa, että UK ja Saksa ovat mukana transhumanismissa. Rapsa kun voi olla kriittinen, suoraan sitä sanomatta.
Rikkaissa transhumanisteissa on se ongelma, että heillä on liikaa valtaa, KUN se pää sekoaa. Eli periaatteessa salaliittoja ei tarvita. Riittää pelkästään seonnut, rikas vaikuttaja, joka härveltää vallan kabineteissa. Siinä on tietty riskinä, että hullun ajatus saa liikaa kitkapintaa.
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Suomesta olisi nyt eka kertaa labrahavaintoa tarjolla grafeenioksidista k-rokotteisiin liittyen, kuulemma löytyisi jopa kaikista 2000:sta jostain otetusta näytteestä. Injektiopiikki-blogin pitäjä oli soittanut FIMEA:n jaostopäällikölle joka kuulemma sanoi ettei kukaan viranomainen Suomessa ole niihin rokotteisiin mennyt kurkkimaan mikroskoopilla yms. kun ei niissä mitään erikoista voi olla kun valmistajat ja EMA sanoo niin. Ja koska faktantarkastajatkin sanoo niin.
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
https://injektiopiikki.com/2022/02/21/kukaan-suomessa-ei-tieda-mita-mrna-injektiot-sisaltavat/
Kukaan Suomessa ei tiedä, mitä mRNA-injektiot sisältävät
Tämä on vain lyhyt päivitys. Valmistelussa on uusi artikkeli, joka kertoo laboratoriosta, joka on analysoinut noin 2000 verinäytettä COVID-injektion saaneilta ihmisiltä. Tulokset ovat karuja. Jokaisessa näytteessä on havaittavaissa grafeenioksidia sekä muita epäpuhtauksia. Myös kiinalaisessa Sinovacissa, perinteisessä rokotteessa. Koko maailman koronarokotteet sisältävät samoja tuoteselosteen ulkopuolella olevia komponentteja ja eliöitä.
Loyd
Kenraali
Lähdekritiikkiä toivoisi.
Viimeksi muokattu:
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Ai niin anteeksi nythän en luota turvallisuudesta vastaaviin viranomaisiin. Vaan olen salaliittoja rakastava Trumpisti.
Tällainenkin salaliitto on esitetty, mutta tietysti FAA on eri kuin FDA. Missään nimessä näitä ei voi rinnastaa millään tavalla.
https://www.netflix.com/fi/title/81272421
Ai mikä sota?