Ukrainan konflikti/sota

Edellisen viestin artikkeli jatkuu, osa 2/3:

In your address on the occasion of your year as Commander-in-Chief, you wrote that one of the priorities is “non-standard actions, not just defense.” Of course, you shouldn’t reveal your plans to the enemy, but do we have the capabilities to do “not just defense” now ? Given the offensive in Sumy and Kharkiv regions , I mean. After all, the enemy has clearly drawn conclusions from Kursk . Sumy is now being ironed out by KABs, and we can’t actually do anything about it .

First, every action has a counteraction. If they use their KABs, we must also use our GBUs , our guided bombs. And we use these weapons and increase the scale. By the way, our Air Force makes such very sensitive strikes for the enemy, and they suffer losses.

Our guidance systems are much better than the enemy's. We have a sufficient number of electronic warfare means that affect the control system of enemy CABs. It flew in one direction, and then for some reason flew in another. The control system and the fight against electronic warfare means is a constant competition, as is the competition between drones and electronic warfare means.

Secondly, it is clear that active actions, active defense, counter-offensive actions remain. They are being carried out, and each time they confirm their effectiveness. Even in these conditions, bold, decisive actions, including on enemy territory, lead to the fact that we thwart all their plans.

Next. The technological component. Regarding drones, improving their characteristics, increasing the range of attack — we also began to receive drones on fiber optics with a 20 km cable , which in principle equalizes our chances with the enemy.

Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Oleksandr Syrsky and Editor-in-Chief of <i>LB.ua</i> Sonya Koshkina

Photo: Main Communications Directorate of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Oleksandr Syrsky and Editor-in-Chief of LB.ua Sonya Koshkina


And I hope that, perhaps, in a month or two or three, we will be able to significantly increase the number of fiber-optic FPVs , which will practically deprive the enemy of the advantages that he currently has.

And, of course, the development of ground drones. There are a lot of them being produced now. Remotely controlled modules. They all have elements of artificial intelligence, that is, they are able to detect targets independently, identify them, and are able to fire automatically, semi-automatically.

Many believe that this is the future.

Well, of course, this is already actually happening, as we once saw in Star Wars.

You mentioned the destruction of the enemy's plans. It is known that the campaign against Kursk thwarted the offensive against Sumy and Kharkiv. Perhaps there is something else that can be discovered?

The thing is that some actions love silence. And we don't talk about them not because we want to hide something, it's just to protect the lives of our people. But we carry out such actions. I think time will pass and everyone will find out about them.

You said that strikes on Russian arsenals reduced the use of artillery shells by half. And how else do our strikes on objects deep in enemy territory affect the course of hostilities?

I have already said that the amount of ammunition has decreased. We managed to destroy several storage and assembly sites of "shaheeds", which also affected the total number of their use.

We carried out a series of successful strikes on airfields , and the enemy was forced to deploy, move its aircraft deep into Russia. If earlier it was at a distance of 100–150 km, now it is 200–300 km - Engels, Shaykovka.

Consequences of the UAV strike on the Engels airbase

Photo: SBU screenshot
Consequences of the UAV strike on the Engels airbase


A few days ago, our successful actions destroyed a long-range bomber Tu-22M3 . It had just landed and our drone hit it. The cost was about $100 million.

The Russian fleet is effectively locked in Novorossiysk. Sometimes it breaks through, but for them it is a test because they know that they are constantly under threat from our strikes.

The air defense system is also one of the areas of damage during a "deep strike", which significantly reduces the capabilities of both the air defense system itself and the system for detecting our air attack means. Each such station costs tens of millions of dollars.

In the same annual address, you wrote: “About 70 thousand servicemen were sent to the combat zone as a result of the reduction (reduction) of the number of protection, service and support units.” However, people from air defense, electronic warfare, and combat aviation units were also transferred to combat brigades. Of course, there is a shortage of people at the front, but is it worth sacrificing narrow specialists who are valuable to the Defense Forces? Are you satisfied with this rotation?

The work continues. We have plans, calculations, and we continue the transfer from rear units to combat units , differentially. Remember the story with pilots, engineers - we take into account the specifics. Usually the transfer concerns security units, logistics support. Moreover, there are also restrictions in logistics, when, for example, those who transport ammunition or fuel have the appropriate permits. And if we transfer them to brigades, then to the same specialties that they performed in logistics units.

In short, this process is ongoing. This is one of the sources of replenishment.

Does it justify itself?

Of course, it justifies.

Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Oleksandr Syrsky and Editor-in-Chief of <i>LB.ua</i> Sonya Koshkina

Photo: Main Communications Directorate of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Oleksandr Syrsky and Editor-in-Chief of LB.ua Sonya Koshkina


The president announced the figure of 30,000 mobilized every month. Speaking of plans, will it remain the same or will we increase it?

The president announced the figure he announced. And this is indeed the figure we must adhere to.

The enemy increases the number of its Armed Forces by eight to nine thousand every month thanks to contractors. In some regions, the cost of a contract reaches 40 thousand dollars. And money is always an incentive for them.

We know that the Russian troops have been replenished with 12,000 North Koreans. Some of them have been eliminated in various ways. What is their number now, and how does this affect the course of hostilities?

The Koreans are arriving. There have already been at least two waves of training and replenishment. They were actively used in the battles in Kursk, forming the basis of the offensive groups. They suffered significant losses because they were attacking and using old Soviet tactics.

Now we are observing the improvement of their training, weapons, and equipment. They have actually switched to the standards of the Russian army. And they continue to be used.

And we don't see how this can be stopped?

Stop? Only physically.

It is known that about six million men have not updated their data in the CCC. Accordingly, they are avoiding mobilization. Is there a vision of how to attract them to the army?

First of all, we need digitalization. When the process is digitalized, we will know all our citizens and where they are.

What part of the mobilization needs is covered by recruitment?

In general, all the figures related to mobilization are confidential. I know all the figures, how many people came this month through recruitment, how many last month, but everything related to mobilization is confidential information. You say one figure, and there ( the enemies .S.K. ) they will quickly count.

Recruitment center employee Vasyl Dzesa advises Yevhen Kvasha at the recruitment center of the 24th Motorized Rifle Brigade in Lviv

Photo: Suspilne Lviv/Olga Deineka
Recruitment center employee Vasyl Dzesa advises Yevhen Kvasha at the recruitment center of the 24th Motorized Rifle Brigade in Lviv


Let's face it, how effective is the recruiting system?

It is gaining its capabilities. Various projects have been launched. There is an opportunity to sign a contract or choose the part in which you want to serve. That is, the system is as flexible as possible. We use all acceptable forms that ensure the involvement of our citizens in military service.

On February 11, the Ministry of Defense presented the terms of contracting for 18–24-year-old volunteers , including a payment of UAH 1 million and a cash allowance of UAH 120,000. The initiatives have caused a mixed reaction.

Skeptics say it is unfair to those already in the ranks of the Defense Forces: people in the same units for the same tasks will receive different financial support. And why should experienced fighters who hold the front line receive less than inexperienced reinforcements? Volunteers or mobilized people who came in 2022 or 2023 have no chance of demobilization, but 18-24-year-olds can demobilize after a year of contract.

In addition, boys of this age who were mobilized earlier did not have such payments. The president promised to somehow review this mechanism. Is there any progress in this direction?


Yes, work is constantly underway, including to eliminate all those negative aspects.

When will the result be and what should it look like, in your opinion?

If I tell you now you won't believe it. I think in the near future, within a month or two. This campaign has actually just started, it is gaining momentum.

Are guys already using this option?

They are using it. And in order to provide maximum opportunities, remember, initially six brigades were identified during the experiment, now 10 more have been added. We are considering all forms, methods, discussing these issues at the Headquarters in order to maximally involve those who can fight, and those who have some limitations - so that they use their capabilities where they can show them, for example, in anti-aircraft units that fight drones, in mobile groups.

Military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Photo: Olga Kosova
Military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine


But it's strange that such a situation has arisen at all. The president claims that he consults with the military on such issues, and here such a resonance is primarily in the military environment.

The military mostly fights. We, of course, join this campaign, but this is more of a question for the Ministry of Defense.

Many military personnel we spoke with say that the Defense Forces have problems with payments for injuries and deaths of servicemen. People often have to go to court to receive proper payments. At the same time, the state has found money to encourage young people. This also does not contribute to a sense of justice.

Problems with payment of compensation for injuries mainly lie in the bureaucratic plane.

The issue is that in order to receive payment, appropriate documents must be provided confirming the circumstances of the injury, the severity of the injury or trauma, the person must undergo a course of treatment and rehabilitation, and there must also be appropriate certificates. Although, of course, the list of these documents is significantly reduced.

In order to simplify this process as much as possible, we introduced a vertical social support service (patronage service), starting with the brigades and ending with the General Staff. And at least the number of such appeals has significantly decreased. I believe that this project has shown its effectiveness.

Therefore, the issue here is not about money, but about procedures.

The problem with the SZCH. Has the situation improved after the criminal punishment for unauthorized abandonment of units was postponed in case of return to the front?

Yes, the situation has changed. Much more servicemen have started to return, and many of them are fighting very well, showing good results.

Some units are almost half staffed by those military personnel who voluntarily left the units.

How many have returned?

Well, thousands.

Servicemen of the 10th Separate Mountain Assault Brigade Edelweiss

Photo: General Staff
Servicemen of the 10th Separate Mountain Assault Brigade "Edelweiss"


The (apparently) insufficient level of mobilization causes two more systemic problems that affect the morale and psychological state of the military and the combat capability of the units: the long-term lack of rotations and the lack of prospects for demobilization. The Cabinet of Ministers was supposed to submit a bill on demobilization by December 18, 2024, but did not do so.

The Ministry of Defense is currently working on several very strange versions of the bill, which would provide for the possibility of long-term rotation or treatment for military personnel for a period of three to five months.


Rotations are carried out. In general, when I began my activities as commander-in-chief, we immediately began withdrawing brigades to restore combat readiness. In fact, the seven brigades that thwarted the offensive in the Kharkiv region were just withdrawn for rotation. Before that, there were no rotations.

But I want to say that the front is constantly expanding, the Kursk operation and the enemy's actions in the Kharkiv region, in Vovchansk, gave us an increase in the front by 200 km. And the enemy has increased its group fivefold since the beginning of the aggression. Every month they increase it by eight to nine thousand, in a year it turns out 120–130 thousand. On January 1, 2025, the group of troops in Russia, which is participating in the hostilities in Ukraine, numbered 603 thousand soldiers, today it is already 623 thousand.

Imagine if they were paid $20,000-$40,000 just for signing a contract, not to mention all the other financial support payments, and a soldier gets $2,500 or more. That is, they throw money at people, and that is the main incentive. We cannot afford that.

If we take the prepared mobilization resource of the enemy — those who have undergone military service, military training — it is about 5 million people. And the mobilization resource in general is 20 million. Imagine their potential. And what can we do in these conditions? Of course, mobilization and transfer.

The issue of rotations will always be on the agenda. Because the front is expanding, the war could last for years…

In conditions when we cannot conduct a full rotation... And we cannot conduct a full rotation, because we are returning to the issue of mobilization again, and we will not delve into it, because it is quite sensitive. There are schedules in brigades, companies, people are released. Anyway, some units of brigades are in the second echelon, so people are released.

6772515e660c7.jpeg

Photo: Max Trebukhov

Along with the issue of rotation, demobilization is also being actively discussed. Among the ideas is to release those who have been serving since 2022. It is clear that this is completely unrealistic . But assuming this, how many people are currently at the front since the full-scale invasion?

Many people. Remember, when the Verkhovna Rada raised the issue last year to include the issue of demobilization in the law on mobilization and provide the opportunity to demobilize those who had served three years, then we calculated that in April of this year, out of the entire group that we had at the front, about 350 thousand would be discharged immediately.

In fact, we would have lost a third of the army.

-​


OSA 2/3 - artikkelin käännös jatkuu seuraavassa viestissä
 
Viimeksi muokattu:
Edellisen viestin artikkeli jatkuu, osa 3/3:

In the process of preparing for the interview, we often heard from commanders of various levels that there is a big problem with the quality of training of mobilized people in training centers. Also, analysts of the Center for Initiatives "Return Alive" have been investigating the problems of the training centers of the Ground Forces for several months, and the results indicate that the training program does not correspond to the realities of war. Moreover, this also applies to those who were trained abroad. And the insufficient level of training affects our losses on the battlefield.

You mentioned among your achievements the increase in the duration of training from one month to one and a half. But this does not seem to have affected the quality. And is one and a half months enough for training?


Preparation is a priority for us. The increase in the duration of training, of course, affected the quality. But in general, it does not last a month and a half, but actually more, if we take the full cycle, without force majeure.

A month and a half is mandatory training at the training center. After that, the serviceman enters the unit and undergoes an adaptive course there: he is directly prepared for action in this particular brigade, with this particular weapon, in this particular area, against a specific enemy.

But it depends on the part.

Yes. This adaptive course lasts a minimum of five days, and a total of two weeks. That is, the entire preparation takes a total of two months.

We are paying maximum attention to this area - and my new deputy, Brigadier General Oleg Apostol (his brigade was distinguished by being well-trained, and in general he has such an innovative approach to personnel training), is currently working on this.

At one training center of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Photo: General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
At one training center of the Armed Forces of Ukraine


This is a priority issue that I personally keep under control. I hold monthly meetings where we summarize the implementation of the tasks that were accepted based on the proposals of commanders and combat training commanders.

We now have two important issues that I am not just concerned about, but which I have set as a priority for myself: drones, that is, unmanned units, the unmanned component, and combat training .

We hold these meetings in a closed video conference mode. Speakers range from the instructor who is training to the commander or brigade commander or head of the training center. They talk about problems or about the implementation of tasks and projects that are currently relevant.

We are focusing on the technical component, on safety during training, because you know that there were ballistic missile strikes. That is, now everything is buried in the ground and as dispersed as possible. And the training process itself is carried out in the most field conditions.

And there was my request and appeal to partners, and at all international meetings I asked that we not send brigades abroad for training, and that they send us instructors or train our instructors abroad. And all the money saved should be invested in the development of our training base. Because, firstly, we would save at least a month on all those movements. And secondly, you remember what the stories were with the two brigades. ( We are talking about the 153rd and 155th brigades , which were trained in Germany and France. They got into a scandal due to problems with organization, improper management and support. — S.K.)

Your critics accuse you of frequently changing brigade commanders, including because of their reluctance to carry out unrealistic tasks. This is how, for example, the subordinates of Colonel Emil Ishkulov explained his removal from the post of commander of the 80th Airborne Assault Brigade . Yuri Butusov, one of your most active critics, said that there are brigades where commanders were changed six times.

Indeed, commanders are changed when the brigade does not perform combat missions, does not hold territory. And the main criterion is when the commander has large losses in personnel. Moreover, this is the main criterion by which the commander's activities are evaluated.

We cannot keep a commander who simply throws his soldiers into battle where they die.

Emil Ishkulov

Photo: Sergey Sternenko's news channel
Emil Ishkulov


Did Ishkulov have such a story?

There was another story there. But we won't talk about it now.

Well, there are other problems. Many lower and middle-level commanders publicly talk about the problem of fictitious reporting. Commanders hide the number of those who went to the SZCh, other problems of units, hide failures, so the tasks they are given very often do not correspond to their combat capabilities. Conventionally, the headquarters may believe that it operates with a hundred fighters on a specific section of the front, while on the ground there may be thirty of them, half of whom are lightly wounded.

Well, that's true. And that's probably our main problem.

And what to do about it? !

Well, first, check the availability of personnel.

Do you understand what the problem is? Why do they show more people on the front line, but in reality there are fewer of them? Well, not all of them, a certain part. To be able to cheat with those people. You know how much a soldier gets on the front line and what is the way to make money. That is, to show that he is here, but in fact he is somewhere there. And this is one of the directions in which work is constantly being carried out. I will not voice the numbers, but this is a problem.

This — concealment of problems — is probably related to the case of Brigadier General Yuriy Galushkin (former commander of the operational-tactical group "Kharkiv"), Lieutenant General Artur Gorbenko (commander of the 125th separate brigade of the Territorial Defense), and Colonel Ilya Lapin (commander of the 415th separate rifle battalion of the 23rd separate mechanized brigade). Galushkin was accused of "identifying defensive positions for the 125th brigade of the Territorial Defense that did not correspond to its combat capabilities." In your opinion, is it appropriate to criticize certain actions in combat management or defense organization, and is this not harmful during a major war?

The situation here is very complicated. Because every serviceman and every commander is responsible for their actions. If you receive a combat order, you are obliged to carry it out. Because failure to carry out a combat order is a crime.

Former commander of the Kharkiv Special Operations Command, Brigadier General Yuriy Galushkin (left) and former commander of the 415th Separate Rifle Battalion of the 23rd Motorized Rifle Brigade, Colonel Ilya Lapin, were arrested during a court hearing.

Photo: suspilne.media
Former commander of the Kharkiv Special Operations Command, Brigadier General Yuriy Galushkin (left) and former commander of the 415th Separate Rifle Battalion of the 23rd Motorized Rifle Brigade, Colonel Ilya Lapin, were arrested during a court hearing.


And when they set tasks, for example, to conduct mining, set up minefields, deploy engineering equipment, install mine-explosive or non-explosive barriers, equip positions, check the organization of the fire system, that is, to move out. Especially in the direction where we already knew that the enemy would attack. The commander of this group received the task from me and reported to me. Orally. And then he also provided written reports that such a task, combat order, was carried out. That is, mining was checked, organized, set up, the system of engineering barriers was increased, etc.

And when you violate or fail to perform an action, but report that you did it, when in fact it was not done, of course, you must be held accountable for it.

Directly during martial law?

There is a concept of a war crime. It's just that the issue here is complex and sensitive when there are hostilities. Because our actions still depend on the actions of the enemy. And we can't always predict how he acts. And how much the volume of work performed can adequately correspond to the actions of the enemy.

Because the enemy is also thinking about how to defeat us, how to bypass us, how to find weak spots in our defense.

But this process is complicated, because, as you know, there are situations when military personnel are exempted from responsibility for immunity for the period of hostilities. Where the line between immunity and failure to comply with a combat order is precisely the responsibility of law enforcement agencies and the State Bureau of Investigation.

Should the Military Prosecutor's Office be restored?

Of course. Because those people are dealing with purely war crimes and military matters, then this process, firstly, does not cause such a resonance in society. And secondly, it is more, let's say, professional, because these are narrow specialists.

Does the US know how many officers are currently under investigation for their actions or decisions during combat operations?

I don't know for sure. I just don't have time for it.

Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Oleksandr Syrsky

Photo: Syrsky/Telegram
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Oleksandr Syrsky

Last summer, Roman Kostenko, secretary of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on National Security, Defense, and Intelligence and a member of the Verkhovna Rada Temporary Investigative Commission on the Procurement of Drones and the Construction of Fortifications, stated that in Ukraine fortifications were often built in places where it was impossible to hold defense . Is the situation better in the border areas, where we can expect a new offensive?

We know that there are lines of defense for which local authorities are responsible, for which the military is responsible. But the video from the positions sometimes shows that they are often not equipped in the best way: there is a lack of normal entrenchment, communication corridors. The 105 mm guns are simply covered with drone nets. The enemy sees this, society sees this.


Everything related to defensive lines in depth is the responsibility of local authorities. Positions in the supply line or on the front line, where there is a direct line of combat contact, are, of course, military. Because the entire territory is hit by all types of weapons. Of course, we cannot talk about any classic fortifications here. They can be built in advance, in peacetime.

You remember from history, there was the Maginot Line, the Mannerheim Line, but all of that was built on the borders in peacetime. Back then, there were really powerful fortifications. And how can you build something if, for example, everything up to five kilometers deep is being shot through with artillery fire and completely destroyed by drones? There can only be field fortifications there, dug by the soldiers themselves with BSL-110 shovels or a sapper's shovel.

In an interview with "1+1" you talked about how in 2022 , after talking with Valery Zaluzhny, you took on the task of preparing the defense of Kyiv, although you did not want to believe in a major invasion, but you understood that you needed to prepare for the worst. And the defense was built, in particular, along the borders of the Second World War. Why did I mention this now? Can we conclude here that the Armed Forces did not have a clear plan to prepare for the invasion at that time ? And how to assess the actions of those who nevertheless prepared at their own risk?

The conversation with Zaluzhny took place about two weeks — ten days before the invasion. About four days later, I turned to him and said that we had basically done everything: conducted reconnaissance, removed soldiers, figured out the borders, how we would build defenses. We need to remove the equipment. He said that he could not give such an order. And I started removing the equipment at my own risk.

The commander of the defense of Kyiv - Commander of the Land Forces of the Armed Forces, Colonel General Oleksandr Syrsky (right) inspected the defense on the northwestern approaches to the capital in the settlement of Moshchun.

Photo: Land Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
The commander of the defense of Kyiv - Commander of the Land Forces of the Armed Forces, Colonel General Oleksandr Syrsky (right) inspected the defense on the northwestern approaches to the capital in the settlement of Moshchun.


When the exercises continued in Belarus, it became clear that this was already an offensive grouping. When their "Smerchi", "Grad", "Uragan", long-range systems were launched along the state border, it was clear that the artillery had reached the starting areas. What else could they do there? It became clear that there would be a war. No matter how much we wanted to, no matter how much we believed it, we must do everything possible so that if the enemy attacks, we can repel the attack.

The intelligence of the GUR provided data that the enemy would attack in eight or nine groups, and they would try to surround Kyiv. I said that it was impossible to surround such a metropolis with nine battalions. Most likely, based on this situation, the enemy would act in such a way that he would create a punching fist, and on the two main directions of entry into Kyiv he would try to break through our fortifications, positions. To get out along the main wide roads to the government quarter, capture the government quarter, capture the state leadership, thereby, in principle, putting an end to the war.

This is quite understandable. What could be done with such a large number? Seize the entrances, approaches to the city and ensure the advancement of their sabotage groups or special forces groups.

And, in the end, it became clear that my assessment was correct. The groups that were destroyed, they had large photo maps of the city, they all had marked routes, and they went right through the government quarter, everyone had boxes, numbers, who had where to go directly in the government quarter and what to capture.

Didn't your colleagues tell you not to panic, why are you scaring everyone?

No, no one ever told me that.

The Land Forces Command staff, just as they were with me before the war, are still fighting with me, although they remained in the Land Forces. But they work with me at the control points.

63bb48b0b74db.jpeg

Photo: Land Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine


In his high-profile interview, General Nayev stated that "the military did not have a single document that stated that Russia's offensive would begin on February 24, 2022." Is this really true?

What kind of document could it be? Realistically. Who knows when there will be a war? If some plan got there, then yes.

Nayev's position is that he is an executor. He was given a command - he clearly executes it. But everyone has their own intelligence. Every commander must predict the enemy's actions. And when he sees signs, especially when it comes to aggression, it is clear that he must take appropriate adequate measures to prevent this aggression from happening.

And if he had started this aggression, how many exercises have we conducted and simulated situations? Everyone knew the algorithms of action.

There was a special specificity for Kyiv, because the operational command "West" was responsible for the defense of Kyiv. But when we talked to Zaluzhny, he asked who was responsible for the defense of Kyiv. "Litvinov," I say ( commander of the troops of the Operational Command "West." - S.K. ). But it was clear that he would not be able to provide it, because there are specifics.

In general, until 2019, the Land Forces Command was responsible for the defense of Kyiv, then a new leader came and said that everything would be like in NATO — all management bodies would be engaged only in training, development, and generation.

In the end, I proposed that I would be responsible for the defense of Kyiv, because this is, of course, a separate direction.

Could we have prepared better looking back?

Everyone hoped and declared that there would be no war...

There are many myths circulating in Ukrainian society related to the beginning of the Great War: was Chongar demined, why did the enemy advance so quickly in the south, why was only the 72nd Brigade covering the Kyiv region, and not in full force, why were there only conscripts of the NGU brigade in Hostomel, what happened in Zhulyany? When, in your opinion, will society receive answers to all such questions?

The war will end, and I think society will try to get these answers.

American investigative journalist Bob Woodward claims in his book “War” that the Russians threatened the United States with the use of nuclear weapons if the Defense Forces destroyed the main enemy forces during their retreat from Kherson in 2022, and Washington put pressure on the Ukrainian leadership. Was this really the case? And how often have our partners generally requested or “ recommended ” something along these lines?

I think this is some kind of nonsense.

Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Oleksandr Syrsky during a trip to the front line.

Photo: General Staff
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Oleksandr Syrsky during a trip to the front line.


Finally. How realistic, in your opinion, is the scenario with the deployment of a peacekeeping contingent not to the LBZ , but simply to the territory of Ukraine — is this option being discussed by the coalition of the willing? Or what, conditionally, is the ideal situation for us of the presence of partner troops here?

The presence of troops of one country or another on the territory of our state is a political issue.

From a military point of view, of course, the presence of a contingent from another country is an additional guarantee of security, because they will guarantee that at least the part where these troops are located will not be hit by the enemy. Of course, theoretically these parts will not be on the front line. They will be where the threat level is minimal.

We support all decisions made by the political leadership, of course. Because they are discussed from a military point of view. And the president never makes such decisions alone.

Will the presence of a peacekeeping contingent be a sufficient security guarantee that the Russians will never return again?

A difficult question. Because the enemy here is like this... You know his plans, and the presence of the contingent disrupts them. And how predictable will they be...

Yes, for a certain period, of course, this will stabilize the situation. But for how long, it is difficult to say.

The last question we ask all our top- level interlocutors since 2022. Each of us puts his own meaning into the word "victory." So what will victory be for you personally , the end of the war?

A just peace — when they reached the borders, they raised flags. And this is the ultimate task.

And realistic?

Realistic - when the enemy leaves our territory. I don't know in what way. Or by military means. But we are doing everything, at least to do it. We can and must do it. We just have to take into account both our capabilities and reality.

The fact that there are borders, they are internationally recognized, and we must stand on them is my deep conviction. And how will this be done? Politically? With the help of partners? That is another question.

Sonya KoshkinaSonya Koshkina , Editor-in-Chief of LB.ua
 
Viimeksi muokattu:
ISW: Venäjän joukot ovat menettäneet yli viiden divisioonan verran tankkeja ja tuhansia sotilaita 13 kuukautta kestäneessä hyökkäyksessä kohti Pokrovskia

- Käynnissä olevat hyökkäysoperaatiot Pokrovskin valtaamiseksi ja Kostjantynivkaan hyökkäämiseksi korostavat Venäjän presidentin Vladimir Putinin päättäväisyyttä vallata koko Ukraina sotilaallisin keinoin hinnalla millä hyvänsä, jos hän ei voi tehdä niin neuvottelujen kautta, ISW arvioi.

ISW viittaa Venäjän kolmeen taktiseen tavoitteeseen alueella:
Pokrovskin ja Kostjantynivkan välisen valtatien katkaisu,
Novopavlivkaan hyökkääminen
Pokrovskin ohittaminen etelästä länteen.

Venäjä pyrkii edelleen saartaman Pokrovskin idästä ja lännestä ja asettamaan painetta Kostjantynivkaa vastaan etelästä etenemällä kaupungit yhdistävää valtatietä pitkin ja eliminoimalla Ukrainan rintamakiilan Toretskin lounaispuolella.Venäjän joukot ovat saavuttaneet ainoastaan marginaalista menestystä Pokrovskin suunnalla johtuen ukrainalaisten paikallisista vastahyökkäyksistä ja droonijoukoista, ISW arvioi.


 
Viimeksi muokattu:
Ryssäläisillä näkyy olevan kampanja menossa, jakavat paljon vanhoja videoita hyökkäyskolonnista ja julistavat uutta tulemista (toki lisäävät kysymysmerkin perään, jotta saavat "luvan kanssa" jakaa mitä tahansa valheita):

Russia bros keep posting old videos of clean, cageless vehicles from 2022 or before as if they are fresh for some reason.

Must be a Kremlin op?



-

Kenraali Syrskyi kommentoikin että ryssän "keväthyökkäys" olisi jo alkanut eli Ukraina on havainnut lisääntynyttä aktiivisuutta eri suunnilla. Lisäksi Sumy ja Kharkova on mainittu "uusina alueina" joissa ryssä kokeilisi edetä.

Oletan että ryssäläistä kampanja liittyisi tähän, tosin heillä ei ole uutta materiaalia jaettavaksi, jolloin joutuvat jakamaan vanhaa.
 
Tilannekatsaus 08.04.2025 klo 08.00 mennessä liittyen Venäjän hyökkäykseen
Kunnia Ukrainalle!

Alkanut on 1140. päivä Venäjän federaation laajamittaisesta aseellisesta aggressiosta Ukrainaa vastaan.

Edellisen vuorokauden aikana kirjattiin yhteensä 159 taistelukosketusta.

Eilen vihollinen iski Ukrainan yksiköiden ja asutuskeskusten asemiin yhdellä ohjuksella ja teki 74 ilmaiskua, joissa pudotettiin yhteensä 120 ohjattua pommia. Lisäksi suoritettiin yli 5800 tulitusta, joista 134 monilaukaisurakettijärjestelmillä, ja hyökättiin 2782:lla itsemurhalennokilla.

Vihollinen teki ilmaiskuja muun muassa seuraaviin paikkoihin: Turja, Uhroidy, Myropilske, Prokhody, Krasnopillja, Petrushivka (Sumyn alue), Voskresenka, Zelené Pole, Novopil (Donetskin alue), Malynivka ja Huliaipole (Zaporižžjan alue).

Ukrainan puolustusvoimien ilmavoimat, raketti- ja tykistöjoukot iskivät eilen 17 vihollisen henkilöstö- ja kalustokeskittymän alueelle, yhteen komentopaikkaan sekä yhteen “Buk” -ilmatorjuntaohjusjärjestelmän tutka-asemaan.

Kupjanskin suunnalla eilen tapahtui neljä vihollisen hyökkäystä. Puolustusjoukot torjuivat vihollisen hyökkäystoimet Pishchanen suuntaan sekä Krugljakivkan ja Zahryzoven läheisyydessä.

Lymanin suunnalla vihollinen hyökkäsi 21 kertaa, pyrkien etenemään Nadiian, Jampolivkan, Torskeen sekä Novoplatonivkan, Novomykhailivkan, Hrekivkan, Ridkodubin, Olhiivkan, Zelenan Dolynan ja Noven suuntiin.

Siverskin suunnalla vihollinen yritti kolmea hyökkäystä Hryhorivkan alueella – kaikki torjuttiin.

Kramatorskin suunnalla kirjattiin kolme taistelukosketusta Kurdiumivkan ja Tšasiv Yarin alueilla.

Toretskin suunnalla vihollinen suoritti 23 hyökkäystä Datschnen, Štšerbynivkan, Ozarianivkan ja Toretskin läheisyydessä.

Pokrovsken suunnalla puolustajamme pysäyttivät 52 hyökkäystoimintaa Kalynoven, Lysivkan, Oleksandropilin, Tarasivkan, Yelyzavetivkan, Udatschnen, Uspenivkan, Preobrazhenkan, Andriivkan, Kotlynen sekä Kotljarivkan, Malynivkan ja Serhiivkan suuntiin.
(Vihollinen kärsii merkittäviä tappioita — tänään tällä suunnalla ukrainalaiset sotilaat eliminoivat 196 miehittäjää, joista 99 pysyvästi. Lisäksi tuhottiin kaksi ajoneuvoa, yksi lennokin ohjausantenni, kaksi moottoripyörää, kaksi satelliittiterminaalia, yksi tykki ja yksi lennokkien johtamispiste. Kolme vihollisajoneuvoa vaurioitui merkittävästi.)

Novopavlivskan suunnalla torjuttiin 12 hyökkäystä Bakhatyrin suuntaan sekä Kostjantynopolin, Rozlyvin ja Skudnen läheisyydessä.

Huljajpilen suunnalla vihollinen teki kaksi tuloksetonta hyökkäysyritystä Ševtšenkon suuntaan.

Orikhivin suunnalla puolustajamme torjuivat kahdeksan vihollisen hyökkäystä Malyi Štšerbakyn, Stepoven ja Štšerbakyn alueilla.

Kurskin operaatioalueella Ukrainan puolustusvoimat torjuivat eilen 21 vihollisen hyökkäystä. Lisäksi vihollinen teki viisi ilmaiskua, joissa käytettiin yhdeksää ohjattua pommia, ja 278 tykistöiskua joukkojemme ja asutuskeskusten asemiin – näistä yksi oli monilaukaisurakettijärjestelmällä.

Harkovan ja Dnipron suunnilla vihollinen ei suorittanut hyökkäystoimia.

Volynin ja Polissjan suunnilla ei ole havaittu merkkejä vihollisen hyökkäysjoukkojen muodostamisesta.

Sotilaamme aiheuttavat miehittäjille merkittäviä tappioita henkilöstössä ja kalustossa ja heikentävät aktiivisesti vihollisen hyökkäyspotentiaalia sen selustassa.

Yhteensä eilen vihollisen tappiot olivat:
• 1290 kaatunutta
• 5 tuhottua tankkia
• 14 taisteluajoneuvoa
• 43 tykistöjärjestelmää
• 3 monilaukaisurakettijärjestelmää
• 2 ilmapuolustusjärjestelmää
• 43 operatiivis-taktista dronea
• 107 ajoneuvoa
• 2 erikoiskalustoyksikköä

IMG_7251.webp

Liity puolustusvoimiin!
Yhdessä voitamme!
Kunnia Ukrainalle!

Tilannetiedotus klo 08.00 – 09.04.2025 – koskien Venäjän hyökkäystä
Kunnia Ukrainalle!

Alkanut on 1141. päivä Venäjän federaation laajamittaista aseellista hyökkäystä Ukrainaa vastaan.

Kuluneen vuorokauden aikana kirjattiin 161 taistelukosketusta.

Vihollinen iski yhdellä ohjuksella ja teki 91 ilmapommitusta, käytti kolmea ohjusta ja pudotti 162 liitopommia (KAB). Lisäksi suoritettiin lähes 4900 tulitusta, joista 100 raketinheittimillä, ja käytettiin 2180 itsemurhadronea iskujen toteuttamiseen.

Ilmaiskuja tehtiin muun muassa seuraavien paikallisuuksien alueille:
• Sumyn alue: Uhroidy, Turja, Pokrovka, Myropilske, Dmytrivka, Mala Rybytsia, Krasnopillja
• Donetskin alue: Zorja, Romanivka, Pokrovsk, Udatšne, Zelenyi Kut, Bahatyr, Zirka, Tolstoi, Voskresenka
• Dnipropetrovskin alue: Novopavlivka, Sitsjneve
• Zaporizhzhjan alue: Huliaipole
• Hersonin alue: Kozatske

Ukrainan puolustusvoimien ilmavoimat, ohjusjoukot ja tykistö iskivät vuorokauden aikana 10 vihollisen elävän voiman ja kaluston keskittymäalueelle.

Rintamatilanne:
• Harkovan suunta: Torjuttiin kolme hyökkäystä Vovtšanskin alueella.

• Kupjanskin suunta: Viisi hyökkäystä Stepova Novoselivkan ja Zahryzoven lähistöllä.

• Lymanin suunta: Vihollinen hyökkäsi 17 kertaa, pyrkien etenemään Hrekivkan, Katerynivkan, Noven ja Kolodiazyn läheisyydessä.

• Siverskin suunta: Ukrainalaiset torjuivat neljä hyökkäystä Hryhorivkan, Bilohorivkan ja Verkhniokamjansken suunnilla.

• Kramatorskin suunta: Kuusi taistelukosketusta Vasjukivkan, Tšasiv Jarin, Bilan Horan ja Kurdjumivkan alueilla.

• Toretskin suunta: 18 hyökkäystä Ozarjanivkan, Toretskin ja Leonidivkan läheisyydessä.

• Pokrovsken suunta: Puolustajat pysäyttivät 58 hyökkäystä Kalynoven, Jelyzavetivkan, Lysivkan, Ševtšenkon, Zviroven, Udatšnen, Uspenivkan, Novooleksandrivkan, Kotljarivkan, Bohdanivkan ja Andrijivkan alueilla.
(Tällä suunnalla ukrainalaiset sotilaat eliminoivat tänään 236 miehittäjää, joista 122 pysyvästi. Lisäksi tuhottiin yksi panssaroitu miehistönkuljetusajoneuvo (BTR), neljä ajoneuvoa, kaksi moottoripyörää, kolme satelliittiviestintäpäätettä, panssarintorjuntaohjusjärjestelmä, neljä UAV-antennia, kolme UAV-johtokeskusta, sekä vaurioitettiin yksi tykistöjärjestelmä ja kaksi vihollisen ajoneuvoa.)

• Novopavlivkan suunta: Torjuttiin 13 hyökkäystä Kostiantynopolin, Rozlyvun, Dniproenerhiin ja Burlatsken lähistöllä.

• Huljajpolen suunta: Kolme hyökkäystä Vilne Polen ja Burlatsken alueilla.

• Orikhivin suunta: Neljä vihollisen hyökkäystä torjuttiin Stepoven ja Lobkoven alueilla.

• Pridniprovskan suunta: Ei kirjattu taistelukosketuksia.

• Kurskin operaatioalue: Torjuttiin 25 hyökkäystä, vihollinen iski 35 kertaa ilmasta 50 liidettävällä pommilla ja suoritti 323 tykistötulitusta, joista seitsemän raketinheittimillä.

Volynin ja Polissjan suunnilla ei ole havaittu vihollisen hyökkäysryhmitysten muodostumista.

Puolustajamme aiheuttavat viholliselle merkittäviä tappioita elävässä voimassa ja kalustossa, ja heikentävät aktiivisesti sen hyökkäyskykyä myös sen selustassa.

Yhteenveto vihollisen tappioista viimeisen vuorokauden aikana:
• 1270 miehistötappioita
• 4 panssarivaunua
• 10 taisteluajoneuvoa
• 52 tykistöjärjestelmää
• 1 ilmatorjuntajärjestelmä
• 56 taktista UAV:ta
• 118 ajoneuvoa

IMG_7252.webp

Liity puolustusvoimiin!
Yhdessä voitamme!
Kunnia Ukrainalle!

⚡️Osuma!

7. Huhtikuuta 2025 Ukrainan asevoimien ilmavoimat iskivät varastorakennusten kompleksiin, jota Venäjän federaation asevoimat käyttivät aktiivisesti Ozerkissa, Kurskin alueella.

Iskun seurauksena tuhottiin halleja, useita sotilasrakennuksia sekä teknistä kalustoa. Yli 30 miehittäjää, mukaan lukien miehittämättömien ilma-alusten (UAV) miehistöjä ja huoltohenkilöstöä, sai surmansa.

Tämän kohteen tuhoaminen heikentää merkittävästi Venäjän federaation kykyä käydä taistelutoimia Ukrainan puolustusvoimien yksiköitä vastaan Sumin alueella ja Kurskin suunnassa.

Ukrainalaiset puolustajat iskevät aitoihin sotilaallisiin kohteisiin ja tekevät kaikkensa suojellakseen siviiliväestöä mahdollisimman hyvin.

Ukrainan asevoimat jatkavat vihollisen sotilaallisen infrastruktuurin tuhoamista, kunnes se lopettaa aseellisen aggression Ukrainan kansaa vastaan.

Jatkuu…
Kunnia Ukrainalle!

Arkistokuvaa kahden “Pantsir”-ilmatorjuntajärjestelmän tuhoamisesta yhdellä rintamasuunnalla 🥰

43. tykistöprikaatin ja “Akhilleus”-yksikön pojat havaitsivat ja iskivät kahteen “Pantsir”-järjestelmään. Tiedustelun ja tulenjohdon heille tarjosi “Shark”-drooni.

Muuten, haluamme kiinnittää huomionne siihen tapaan, jolla drooni ohjattiin toisen järjestelmän tuhoamisessa. Näyttää hyvin paljon uudelta SETH-droonijärjestelmältä 👀

Auringonkukka 🌻


Valokuitulaatuista dronekuvaa.
 
Ukrainalle lisää tukea, ryssän jäädytettyjen rahojen tuotosta (tästä saa sellaisen vaikutelman että kokonaissumma olisi 4,1 miljardia euroa huhtikuussa 2025, mutta pitänee varmistaa muista lähteistä että näin todellakin on):

EU to deliver €2.1 billion in revenue from immobilised assets to be used for support to Ukraine

This week the Commission will receive €2.1 billion due in windfall profits generated from immobilised assets of the Russian Central Bank.

-

For defense needs, Ukraine will receive another €2.1 billion from frozen Russian assets by the end of the month, — Kallas.


 
Ainakin 155 Kiinan kansalaista taistelee Venäjän joukoissa, sanoo Ukrainan presidentti Volodomyr Zelenskyi. Zelenskyin mukaan Kiina tietää, että Venäjä rekrytoi kiinalaisia Ukrainaan.

Ei Kiinalla ole vara lähteä Ukraina sotaan. Tosin Kiinassa kyllä jyllää vahva ryssän propaganda joten joltain köyhiltä alueilta voi olla kyllä hyvinkin mahdollista rekryä porukkaa. Mutta en usko että Kiina tässä olisi valtiollisella tasolla mukana
 
Helikopteri kuluttaa jäätävästi polttoainetta kiinteäsiipiseen verrattuna, joten pidän epätodennäköisenä että tuo on lentänyt ukrainasta moskovaan. Ellei partisaanit ole tankanneet sitä jossain matkan varrella. Myös pohjassa oleva valo herättää epäilyjä. Lieköhän jonkinlaista torjuntakalustoa, johon on laitettu valo päälle ettei omat ammu alas?
 
Viimeksi muokattu:
Ei Kiinalla ole vara lähteä Ukraina sotaan. Tosin Kiinassa kyllä jyllää vahva ryssän propaganda joten joltain köyhiltä alueilta voi olla kyllä hyvinkin mahdollista rekryä porukkaa. Mutta en usko että Kiina tässä olisi valtiollisella tasolla mukana

Kiina kyllä tietää mitä kansalaiset tekee. Eli siinä mielessä Kiina on mielestäni mukana.
 
Kyllä tuo minusta videon perusteella on selkeästi pyöriväsiipinen laite. Muuten olen täysin samaa mieltä @Rakuuna40 kanssa, ei tuo Ukrainasta asti ole tullut ainakaan ilman välilaskua. Toki ihan mieltälämmittävää sekin, jos ryssän dronepelot ovat sillä tasolla, että säikkyvät jo kaikkea lentävää, omiaankin.
 
Helikopteri kuluttaa jäätävästi polttoainetta kiinteäsiipiseen verrattuna, joten pidän epätodennäköisenä että tuo on lentänyt ukrainasta moskovaan. Ellei partisaanit ole tankanneet sitä jossain matkan varrella. Myös pohjassa oleva valo herättää epäilyjä. Lieköhän jonkinlaista torjuntakalustoa, johon on laitettu valo päälle ettei omat ammu alas?

Olisi tosiaan erikoista lennellä täysi discovalaistus päällä, kas kun ei valkyrien marssia soittanut.
 
Kyllä tuo minusta videon perusteella on selkeästi pyöriväsiipinen laite. Muuten olen täysin samaa mieltä @Rakuuna40 kanssa, ei tuo Ukrainasta asti ole tullut ainakaan ilman välilaskua. Toki ihan mieltälämmittävää sekin, jos ryssän dronepelot ovat sillä tasolla, että säikkyvät jo kaikkea lentävää, omiaankin.
Rohkenen esittää toisen mielipiteen. Härveli jättää jälkeensä savuvanaa eli on polttomoottorikäyttöinen. Rotaxin ilmailumoottoreissa pakoputki on edestäkatsottuna oikealla kuten tässäkin. Laite lentää suoraan eli lentorata on mahdollinen kiinteäsiipisellä. Loppu onkin sitten smoke&mirrors eli pakokaasu on sen verran näkyvää että taitaa olla öljysyöttö laitettu pakosarjaan. Näyttävät valot saadaan ledeillä ja niihin on helppo laittaa efektiä jos toistakin. Ledit tikkuun soivaan kohtaan, pakokaasuun lisää savua ja heijastetaan efektiä lisäledeillä savuverhoon.

Lopputulos on ryssän some täynnä postauksia Ukrainan helikopterihyökkäyksestä moskovaan. Ja samalla koneen näkyvä tähtäyspiste on valoefektien kohdalla, ei koneen rungon kohdalla. Senkun hinaa valohimmeliä perässä ja heijastelee perässä tulevaan savupilveen. Tämän kun tekee moskovan lähiöiden päällä niin kaikki ampuu kohti, kaikki tuijottaa taivaalle ja sieltä ne luodit tulee myös alas.
 
Olisi tosiaan erikoista lennellä täysi discovalaistus päällä, kas kun ei valkyrien marssia soittanut.

Mordorissa ohjesäännöt muuttuvat niin verkkaisesti että jos moskoviittien it-porukalle on iskostettu että navigointivalot päällä = omia, niin mikä olisikaan Ukrainan mielestä parempi konsti sekoittaa pakkaa kuin laittaa osa droneista/mistälie lentokalustosta lentämään kohdealueella vaikka ympyrää discovalot täydessä loistossaan.
 
Back
Top