Trump -psykoosi

  • Viestiketjun aloittaja Viestiketjun aloittaja ak.tied
  • Aloitus PVM Aloitus PVM
Noniin, ketjun nimen mukainen Trump-psykoosi leviää nyt vähemmistö-mp-nettiläisten keskuudesta USA:n talouden ammattilaisiin. Otetaan tähän nyt hyvä käppyrä, eli Atlanta GDPNow:
Katso liite: 120312
Suomennettu juttu täällä:
https://www.is.fi/taloussanomat/art-2000011076140.html

Mutta kun en oikein tykkää täkäläisen lehdistö ammattitaidottomuudesta niin mennään alkulähteelle:

Lyhyesti: kulutustavaroiden hinnan jyrkkä nousu johtaa kulutuskysynnän jyrkkään laskuun ja inflaation kiihtymiseen. Ostovoiman heikentyminen inflaation ja DOGE leikkausten takia johtaa noidankehään jonka merkit nyt nähdää.


No eipä tässä mitään uutta. Päivittäistavaroiden kaupassa tuonti on jossan sekmenteissä USA:ssa jopa puolet. Tähän kun lyöt sen 25% tullia niin koko sekmentin hinta nousee sen 25% tai sitten joku lopettaa ostamisen. Laittomat maahanmuuttajat edustavat suurinta osaa palkatusta työvoimasta erityisesti maataloudessa. Eli ovat sesonkityöläisiä satokaudella. Nyt siis ajetaan kotimaisen maatalouden kulut ylös ja hukataan työvoima sekä estetään tuonti. Voitte arvata mitä käy markkinahinnalle. Lisäksi ruoka tuppaa olemaan sellainen artiklei jota ostetaan tai sitten kuollaan nälkään.

Hallinnon jättipotkuaalto DOGE:na vie sitten samalla ostovoimaa markkinoilta. Puolustuspudjetin leikkaukset vie sitten työt asetehtailta. Tämä joukko on nimenomaan sitä hyvätuloisempaa jolla on varaa palveluihin pellkän ruuan lisäksi. Leikkaa hyvin kulutusta. Samaan pakettiin sitten pian tuleva velkakaton noston Kongressijumppa. Markkinat reagoi jo tähänkin, kukaan ei usko trumputtimen kykyyn saada tätäkään diiliä maaliin ilman valtavia oheisvahinkoja.

Markin loppulause:
"Lawmakers need to get it together soon, or the economy will go from gagging to choking."

Eli nyt talous vasta kakoo mutta jos trumputin ei saa itseään kuriin niin sekoilupolitiikka johtaa talouden todelliseen kuristumiseen. Tuo GPD:n muutos 3% kasvusta 3% kutistumiseen on historiallisesti samaa kuin 29.10.1929 alkanut tapahtumaketju.

Mark Zandi on Moody:n johtava analyytikko. Hänet ostettiin Moodylle 2005 27 miljoonan dollarin kaupalla.


Joten nyt alkaa ihan oikeasti isot markkinoita heiluttavat analyytikot kertoa että trumputin töräyttelee ihan täyttä tuubaa. Ja tämä perustuu markkinadataan eli jo toteutuneeseen talousvahinkoon.
Niinpä. Tähän kun lisätään autoteollisuuden vaikeudet, eli kotimaisen kysynnän romahtaminen, kun ihmisillä ei ole varaa ostaa uusia autoja, sekä viennin hiipuminen. Joten tulemme näkemään hyvinkin pian isoja irtisanomisia ja tehtaiden sulkemisia.

Toinen mainitsematta jäänyt ala on myös rakennusteollisuus, jossa laittomat maahanmuuttajat ovat varsin merkittävä osa työvoimasta. Tämä taas nostaa rakentamisen ja asumisen hintaa, joka taas pahentaa tätä yleistä taloustilannetta.


Lisäys vielä tähän perään GPDNow on FED, eli Usan keskuspankin julkaisema ennuste. Ennusteesta vastaa FED Atlantan konttori. Varsinainen GPD lasketaan kavartaaleittain, eli trumputtimet vaikutus GPD:hen tulee varmistettua vasta kesäkuussa. GPDNow laskee näitä samoja tunnuslukuja päiväkohtaisten arvojen pohjalta ja tekee niiden pohjalta ennusteen jotta saadaan selville tämänpäivän GPD ja sen muutos. Normaalisti ennuste heiluu alle prosentin putkessa eli nyt nähty muutos on kuusinkertainen normaaliin.

Täällä ollaan oltu vahvasti sitä mieltä että ei se trumputin ulos lennä. Jotenkin kyllä olen erimieltä, siinä vaiheessa kun kaikki talouden lukemat on jyrkästi punaisella useamman viikon niin se viraltapanoäänestys syntyy aika vikkelään. Markkinat jo reagoi:

Päivän hesari:
"Nordean senioristrategi Hertta Alava kertoo rahastoraporttien näyttävän, että sijoittajien varoja virtaa nyt Eurooppaan."

Joten ameebamaisen kankea ja muuttumaton EU nähdään nyt kovanluokan turvasatamana taloudellisessa mielessä. Rahastoraportoinnissa kuten kaikessa oikeassa talousdatassa on aina usean viikon viive, eli nyt data näyttää tilanteen vähän trumputtimen virkaanastumisen jälkeen ja viimeisen viikon tulokset saadaan loppukuusta. USA on talousmahtiin perustuva valtio ja mitkäs on raadin veikkaukset, annetaanko yhden sekopään tuhota tuo mahti? Vai olisko sittenkin helpompaa vain heittää kyseinen häirikkö yli laidan?
En ole mikään Trump fani, mutta oma ajatus on ollut se, että annetaan hänelle nyt mahdollisuus näyttää mihin hän pystyy. Ja luule, että suurin osa häntä äänestäneistä ajattelee juuri näin, mutta kyllä tuo tilanne nyt näyttää todella huonolta. Tällä hetkellä Yhdysvaltain talous ottaa sellaista iskua, että oksat pois ja tuohon verrattuna Ukrainan mineraalidiili on pelkkiä taskurahoja.

Voisin kuvitella, että kulisseissa käydään aikamoista vääntöä hallinnon sekä republikaanisen puolueen johdon välillä. Paras tilanne olisi tietenkin se, että Trump myöntäisi virheensä ja pistäisi hallinnon sekä politiikan uusiksi, mutta löytyykö nöyryyttä siihen?

Jos taas sitä nöyryyttä ei löydy, niin homma voi mennä todella rumaksi. Iso kysymys on myös vuoden 2026 välivaalit ja vuoden 2028 presidentinvaalit. Kuinka iso selkäsauna sieltä on tulossa republikaaneille ja kauanko siitä selviämiseen menee?
 
.
Trump taitaa etsiä jo vauhdilla uutta presidenttiä Ukrainaan. Voipi hyvinkin olla ettei US tuki palaa, ennenkin presidentiksi vaihtuu Trumpin mieleinen


Pahin skenario olisi, että Ukrainan johtoon pääsee joku ryssä. Jonkun vuoden se ottaa ja sen jälkeen aseet käännetään meitä vastaan. Mehän ollaan käytännössä hylätty Ukraina siinä vaiheessa vaikka paljon ollaan luvattu. Siellä saattaa olla sen verran kyrpiintynyttä porukkaa ettei välttämättä tarvi ryssillä edes paljon piipulla tökkiä että lähtevät hyökkiin. Ukrainaan pitäisi saada vähintään jotain eurooppalaisia joukkoja pitämään järjestystä. Tai ehkä peli on siinä vaiheessa jo menetetty..
 
Edelleen pidän demokratiaa itseisarvona ja on hyvä että Trump on valittu rehellisillä vaaleilla.
Tuostakin on esitetty epäilyksiä. *ISON* suolamäärän kanssa enkä ole tarkastanut numeroita, mutta sivulla https://smartelections.us/dropoff väitetään että kuudessa swing statessa oli melkein 190 000 äänestäjää, jotka äänestivät demokraattia senaattiin mutta eivät äänestäneet Harrisia, ja 750 000 äänestäjää, jotka äänestivät Trumpia mutta eivät äänestäneet republikaania senaattiin. Vertailussa olleissa 11 muussa osavaltiossa Harris sai yli 350 000 ääntä enemmän kuin potentiaaliset demokraattisenaattorit (ja Trump vastaavasti yli 460 000 enemmän). _Jos_ pitää paikkansa niin hiukan erikoiselta kyllä näyttää.

Olen kyllä harvinaisen kiitollinen siitä, ettei Suomessa ole sähköistä äänestystä.

Edit: laitetaan vielä kuva artikkelista:
 

Liitteet

  • US_drop-off-voters_2024.webp
    US_drop-off-voters_2024.webp
    45.1 KB · Luettu: 19
Tuostakin on esitetty epäilyksiä. *ISON* suolamäärän kanssa enkä ole tarkastanut numeroita, mutta sivulla https://smartelections.us/dropoff väitetään että kuudessa swing statessa oli melkein 190 000 äänestäjää, jotka äänestivät demokraattia senaattiin mutta eivät äänestäneet Harrisia, ja 750 000 äänestäjää, jotka äänestivät Trumpia mutta eivät äänestäneet republikaania senaattiin. Vertailussa olleissa 11 muussa osavaltiossa Harris sai yli 350 000 ääntä enemmän kuin potentiaaliset demokraattisenaattorit (ja Trump vastaavasti yli 460 000 enemmän). _Jos_ pitää paikkansa niin hiukan erikoiselta kyllä näyttää.

Olen kyllä harvinaisen kiitollinen siitä, ettei Suomessa ole sähköistä äänestystä.

Edit: laitetaan vielä kuva artikkelista:
Intersektionaalisen fiminismin esiintymä eli nainen ja vaihtoehtona periteikäs kristitty niin tuossa kääntyi aika monen miesäänestäjän valinta trumputtimeen. Presidentinvaali kun on henkilövaali.
 
Putinin entinen neuvonantaja on sanonu, että kuuli jo 25.2. ennen viime perjantain tapaamista siis, että USA meinaa katkasta tuen Ukrainalle. Melko paksu väite ja mikäli paikkansa pitää, niin melko likaista peliä Trumpin porukka pitää. Noin minuutilla kohdalla kyseinen kohta jossa noin sanoo.

Edit: tässä tuosta Iliarinovista enemmän niille joille ei ole tuttu jo aiemmin:

Edit 2: Tässä linkki alkuperäiseen videoon Illiarionovin Youtube kanavalle, saa englanninkielisen automaattiteksityksen asetuksista ja tuossa ihan alussa tuo kohta on. Mutta pitää tosiaan isolla suola-annoksella ottaa tuo vastaan.
 
Viimeksi muokattu:
Ovat sellaisessa "älä keskeytä vihollistasi kun se on tekemässä virheen" - moodissa.
On ehdoton ryssän etu että trumputin saadaan niin sekaisin että erotusprosessi alkaa. Joten vihjeet ryssän kätyrinä olemisesta nousee tatusti pintaan jokapuolelta. Samalla vahvistetaan sellaisia signaaleja jotka tehostaa äärisuuntiin menoa. Erottaminen vie kuitenkin viikkoja-kuukausia ja sen aikana USA:n ulkopolitiikka on täysin jumissa. Täysin sekaisin ja jumissa oleva USA:n liittovaltion hallinto tarjoaa lukuisia kivoja mahdollisuuksia niin ryssän kuin muidenkin myyräntyölle. Akselilla myyrä-hyödyllinen idiootti ei tässä ole enää mitään väliä, lopputulos on ihan sama.

Talousseuraraukset tästä jo käytiinkin ja se puoli etenee juuri niinkuin kreml on sen halunnut etenevän.
 
Trump karkottaa ukrainalaiset muiden mukana. Voidaan karkottaa heti, koska laillisesti maahan saapuneiden turvapaikan tai muun maassaoloperusteen perumisille ei ole määräaikoja: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/tr...krainians-who-fled-us-sources-say-2025-03-06/

WASHINGTON, March 6 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is planning to revoke temporary legal status for some 240,000 Ukrainians who fled the conflict with Russia, a senior Trump official and three sources familiar with the matter said, potentially putting them on a fast-track to deportation.
The move, expected as soon as April, would be a stunning reversal of the welcome Ukrainians received under President Joe Biden's administration.

The planned rollback of protections for Ukrainians was underway before Trump publicly feudedwith Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy last week. It is part of a broader Trump administration effort to strip legal status from more than 1.8 million migrants allowed to enter the U.S. under temporary humanitarian parole programs launched under the Biden administration, the sources said.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said the department had no announcements at this time. The White House and Ukrainian embassy did not respond to requests for comment.

A Trump executive order issued on January 20 called for DHS to "terminate all categorical parole programs."
The administration plans to revoke parole for about 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans as soon as this month, the Trump official and one of the sources familiar with the matter said, requesting anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. The plan to revoke parole for those nationalities was first reported, opens new tab by CBS News.
Migrants stripped of their parole status could face fast-track deportation proceedings, according to an internal ICE email seen by Reuters.
Immigrants who cross the border illegally can be put into the fast-track deportation process known as expedited removal, for two years after they enter. But for those who entered through legal ports of entry without being officially "admitted" to the U.S. - as with those on parole - there is no time limit on their rapid removal, the email said.

The Biden programs were part of a broader effort to create temporary legal pathways to deter illegal immigration and provide humanitarian relief.
In addition to the 240,000 Ukrainians fleeing the Russian invasion, and the 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans, these programs covered more than 70,000 Afghans escaping the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.
An additional 1 million migrants scheduled a time to cross at a legal border crossing via an app known as CBP One.
Thousands more had access to smaller programs, including family reunification parole for certain people in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Trump as a candidate pledged to end the Biden programs, saying they went beyond the bounds of U.S. law.
The Trump administration last month paused processing immigration-related applications for people who entered the U.S. under certain Biden parole programs - placing Ukrainian Liana Avetisian, her husband and her 14-year-old daughter, in limbo. Avetisian, who worked in real estate in Ukraine, now assembles windows while her husband works construction.

The family fled Kyiv in May 2023, eventually buying a house in the small city of DeWitt, Iowa. Their parole and work permits expire in May. They say they spent about $4,000 in filing fees to renew their parole and to try to apply for another program known as Temporary Protected Status.
Avetisian has started getting headaches as she worries about their situation, she said.
“We don’t know what to do,” she said.

WANING WELCOME​

U.S. allies from Afghanistan who entered under Biden have also been swept up in Trump's crackdown.
Rafi, a former Afghan intelligence officer who asked to be identified only by his first name to protect family members still in Afghanistan, entered the U.S. legally in January 2024 using the CBP One mobile app at the U.S.-Mexico border. He was given a temporary humanitarian parole status that allowed him to live and work in the United States for two years.
On February 13, just over a year into that status, he was detained at a check-in appointment at an ICE office in Chantilly, Virginia. His status was revoked.
In Afghanistan, Rafi was trained by American officers and provided intelligence on “High Value Targets”, according to an October 2022 recommendation letter.
“As a result of his active efforts against the enemy, he is currently in extreme danger, and in need of assistance in departing the country,” the former CIA officer who trained him wrote.
The officer described Rafi as “truly one of the most dedicated and hardworking individuals I had the honor to serve with in Afghanistan.” Reuters reviewed the letter but was not able to reach the officer.
In the United States, Rafi applied for asylum and was scheduled for a hearing before an immigration judge in April.
At his February ICE check in - one of the conditions for his temporary status - he was asked to remove his belt and shoelaces, he said. He knew immediately what was happening, he said, and still, he asked: “Are you arresting me? I have broken no law.”
Rafi said he felt betrayed.
“When someone stands shoulder to shoulder with American troops and puts his life in danger…” he said in a phone call from detention, his voice shaking.
“I wasn't expecting this behavior from them. I wasn't expecting it.”
On February 24, his lawyer wrote to ICE asking them to release her client, noting his lack of a criminal record, that he was not a flight risk and had an active asylum case related to his work supporting the U.S. military in Afghanistan.
James Mullan, the assistant field office director at ICE’s Washington field office responded that ICE was declining to release him.
“The priorities that you mentioned in your email ended on January 20, 2025,” Mullan wrote, referring to the date of Trump’s inauguration.
 
5D-shakkia. USA:lta ruvetaan piilottamaan tiedustelutietoja

Useat USA:n tiedustelun kärkipositioissa toimineet, ovat jo vuosia taaksepäin. Esiin tuoneet huoliaan tuohon mitä artikkelissa sivutaan. Trumpin ja Venäjä-kriittisistä äänistä puhdistetun GOP:in psyop on edennyt pisteeseen, jossa Trumpilla on ollut immuniteetti US-RUS suhteiden kieroutuneeseen kehitykseen.

MItä seuraavaksi. US-RUS -pakotteiden purku? Trumpin Nixon-in-China hetki Moskovassa, lähentymisen ja muun paskan hengessä?

March 6, 2025, 12:00 PM GMT+2
By Dan De Luce, Courtney Kube, Carol E. Lee and Kevin Collier
Some U.S. allies are considering scaling back the intelligence they share with Washington in response to the Trump administration’s conciliatory approach to Russia, four sources with direct knowledge of the discussions told NBC News.

The allies are weighing the move because of concerns about safeguarding foreign assets whose identities could inadvertently be revealed, said the sources, who included a foreign official.

Every intelligence agency treats its commitments to foreign agents as sacrosanct, pledging to keep agents safe and shield their identities. Anything that jeopardized that obligation would violate that trust, former officials said, and that could lead some spy services to hold back on some information sharing with Washington.

The allies, including Israel, Saudi Arabia and members of the so-called Five Eyes spy alliance of English-speaking democracies, are examining how to possibly revise current protocols for sharing intelligence to take the Trump administration’s warming relations with Russia into account, the sources said

“Those discussions are already happening,” said a source with direct knowledge of the discussions.

No decision or action has been taken, however, the sources said.

The review is part of a wider examination of the spectrum of relations with Washington among many U.S. allies, including diplomacy, trade and military cooperation, as well as intelligence matters, the sources said.

Historic implications
Though the extent of a U.S. policy change toward Russia remains unclear, allies are weighing the possible implications of what could be a historic shift, a Western official said.

Asked about allies’ possibly limiting what they share with the United States, a spokesman for the White House National Security Council said President Donald Trump is “clear-eyed” about America’s adversaries.

“The U.S. has unrivaled intelligence capabilities which is exactly why intelligence sharing initiatives such as the Five Eyes exist,” spokesman Brian Hughes said in an email.

“President Trump is clear-eyed on all threats our adversaries pose to our national security and he will work with any ally or partner who understands the dangerous world inherited after the disastrous Biden years," he added. "On Biden’s watch, we had the war in Ukraine, the surrender in Afghanistan, and the slaughter of the innocents on October 7th.”

Administration officials and some Republican lawmakers have defended Trump’s handling of Russia as a tactic designed to bring Moscow to the negotiating table and clinch a peace deal that would end a destabilizing war in Europe. Bust distrust of Russian President Vladimir Putin, a veteran KGB officer, remains high among U.S. allies.

Image: MI6
The British Secret Intelligence Service, commonly known as MI6's headquarters at Vauxhall Cross in London.Anadolu Agency / Getty Images file
Publicly, longtime U.S. allies downplayed the issue. The United Kingdom, the most important U.S. intelligence partner, said it had no plans to reduce intelligence cooperation with the United States.

“The U.S. is the UK’s closest ally and we will continue to cooperate closely on defence, intelligence and security matters,” a British government spokesperson said in an email. “Any suggestion otherwise is totally untrue.”

Recommended

Congress
Republicans can't meet their own budget target without cutting Medicare or Medicaid, budget office says

Congress
Musk and GOP senators discuss pathway to cement DOGE cuts in closed-door meeting
The Canada Security Intelligence Service said in a statement that it has strong relationships with numerous U.S. agencies that are “long-standing and resilient.”

It added, “Canada deeply values its partnership with the United States, and we believe that it is in the strategic interest of both countries to continue our strong national security cooperation.”

An Israeli official also praised its alliance with the U.S., saying "Cooperation between Israel and the United States on every level, including the sharing of crucial intelligence data, is as strong and solid as ever."

Officials from New Zealand, Australia and Saudi Arabia did not respond to requests for comment.

Some officials in allied countries, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters, played down the idea that Trump’s policies on Russia would disrupt information sharing that dates back decades. They noted that intelligence can be shared in ways that protect sources and methods.

The seal of Central Intelligence Agency in the lobby the headquarters building in Langley, Va., on Sept. 24, 2022.
The seal of the CIA in the lobby of its headquarters in Langley, Va., on Sept. 24, 2022.Kevin Wolf / AP file
But some former U.S. intelligence officers say they are concerned that the Trump administration may opt to scale back intelligence collection aimed at Russia, as the U.S. may no longer see Russia as a top threat.

The administration, for example, has indicated it may place a higher priority on efforts to counter drug cartels from Mexico and other countries in the region. Already, the Defense Department has deployed more resources to the southern border, including a team of analysts. And the CIA has launched drone surveillance flights over Mexico as part of that effort.

Trump’s decision this week to pause intelligence assistance to Ukraine, along with military aid, has reinforced concerns among allies. The intelligence cooperation with Kyiv — which has developed since Russia’s initial invasion of Ukraine in 2014 — has benefited both Washington and Kyiv, former officials say, with Ukraine providing valuable insights about Russia.

In weighing whether to dial back some intelligence sharing, the Five Eyes allies — the U.K., Australia, Canada and New Zealand — and other U.S. partners would have to take into account risks to their own national security if cooperation with Washington were reduced.

Cybersecurity concerns
But recent moves by the Trump administration regarding cybersecurity have also fueled concerns about the administration’s engagement with Moscow.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth last month ordered U.S. Cyber Command to halt offensive cyber operations and information operations against Russia, NBC News has reported. It is unclear how long the order will last.

Ukrainian servicemen load artillery
Ukrainian servicemen load artillery before firing toward Russian positions in Donetsk on Jan. 22.Evgeniy Maloletka / AP
And in a speech at a U.N. working group on cybersecurity last month, a senior State Department official, Liesyl Franz, made no mention of Russia as a top cyber threat and cited only China and Iran.

For years, including during Trump’s first term, Republican and Democratic administrations have described Russia as one of the most sophisticated and dangerous threats to American cybersecurity.

With Trump and his deputies echoing some of Russia’s talking points about the Ukraine war and indicating they hope to expand U.S. relations with Moscow, former intelligence officials say the administration may even share some sensitive information with Moscow.

Several former U.S. intelligence officers said they and their colleagues still in government are deeply concerned about the possible implications of the administration’s shift toward Russia, in which Moscow may no longer be treated as an adversary.

“People are very worried,” a former intelligence official said.

Ukrainian servicemen of Khartya brigade on the frontline
A Ukrainian soldier fires a howitzer near the border with Russia in Lyptsi, eastern Ukraine, on Jan. 10.Wolfgang Schwan / Anadolu via Getty Images file
Formidable alliance
The Five Eyes alliance is arguably the most formidable espionage alliance in the world. The intelligence cooperation among its members is deeply embedded, dating to the 1940s, and officials have credited it with helping counter the Soviets during the Cold War and foiling terrorist plots in recent decades.

The sharing of satellite imagery and eavesdropping intelligence among alliance members is extensive, highly integrated and “nearly automatic,” a former intelligence official said.

Unwinding the technical side of the alliance’s cooperation would be complicated and difficult, former officials said. A likelier scenario could have allied governments withholding some intelligence from human sources or analyses that could cause friction with the White House, several former intelligence officials said.

Rep. Jason Crow, D-Colo., a member of the House Intelligence and Armed Services committees, said he was deeply concerned by the Trump administration’s “rapid pivot towards the Kremlin” and media reports that U.S. Cyber Command was pulling back on cyber operations against Russia.

“Russia is an adversary and, as always, looking for opportunities to sow discord and make trouble for Americans and for the government, so any stand-down or pullback of our operations could be catastrophic,” Crow said in an interview.

The administration’s actions on cybersecurity have fueled speculation that Washington and Moscow may have come to an informal understanding to pull back from aggressive digital operations to reduce tensions and open the way for more diplomacy.

Image: Rally Held In Support Of USAid As Trump Administration Works To Disrupt The Agency
Rep. Jason Crow, D-Colo., during a rally in support of U.S. Agency for International Development on the grounds of the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 5.Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images file
It is possible that the Trump administration and Russia have agreed to “a cyber détente,” said Emily Harding, a former intelligence official. But Harding and other former intelligence officials warned that in past, attempts by the United States to forge limited cooperation with Russia, the Kremlin has proved to be an unreliable partner.

“That sounds good in theory,” said Harding, director of the Intelligence, National Security, and Technology Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank in Washington. “I think the next question is whether you think Russia would actually stick to it.”

A hub for cybercriminals
A major hitch to any cyber détente with Moscow is Russia’s status as a hub of cybercriminals who target Americans. Russia does not extradite its citizens, and it has largely refused to work with U.S. law enforcement agencies when they identify hackers attacking American businesses, hospitals and government networks.

Of particular concern is ransomware, in which hackers, often Russian-speaking criminal gangs, deploy malicious software to lock up computer networks and demand payment.

Known attacks on the U.S. public sector frequently tied to Russia have steadily increased each year through 2024, according to a survey conducted by the cybersecurity company Emsisoft.

The cybersecurity insurer Coalition found in a report published in October that ransomware attacks around the globe cost companies $353,000 on average last year. In some instances, ransomware gangs have alluded to ties to Russian intelligence.

Philip Reiner, CEO of the Institute for Security and Technology, a San Francisco think tank that focuses on cybersecurity policy, told NBC News that any new agreement with Russia needs to persuade the Kremlin to rein in its cybercriminals who target Americans, as they rarely face legal repercussions in Russia.

“Any engagement the Trump administration has to normalize relations around cyber has got to take into account the economic terrorism that Russia engages in via ransomware gangs,” Reiner said. “That has to be a factor in any overall negotiation.”

Previous U.S. presidents from both parties have tried to “reset” relations with Russia and explored sharing intelligence about common threats with Moscow. After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, President George W. Bush asked U.S. spy agencies to pursue possible collaboration with Russia on terrorism threats. But the effort “went nowhere fast,” a former intelligence official said.

The Russians were not interested in sharing sensitive information about terrorist groups, according to former officials.

In an op-ed in 2020 in The Washington Post, former CIA officer John Sipher and other former colleagues recounted how attempts to increase cooperation with Moscow’s spy services repeatedly failed.

“Inside the CIA, we often joked that, to Putin, win-win means I beat you twice,” they wrote. “Good intentions from the U.S. side have proved time and again to have been futile in improving relations.”

James Clapper, ex DNI. Sananen RUS-uhasta:
 

Trump to revoke legal status for 240,000 Ukrainian refugees as US steps up deportations​


U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is planning to revoke temporary legal status for some 240,000 Ukrainians who fled the conflict with Russia, a senior Trump official and three sources familiar with the matter said, potentially putting them on a fast-track to deportation.
The move, expected as soon as April, would be a stunning reversal of the welcome Ukrainians received under President Joe Biden's administration.


-----------

Uutinen on Reutersin julkaisema, ei foliohattufoorumin iltavuoron kännijorinaa 😮

Ukrainalaiset mukaanluettuna päätös koskettaa noin miljoonaa henkilöä, joista valtaosa on Karibian alueelta.
 
Back
Top