Mielenkiintoinen siviilejä koskettava uutinen Donetskista.
Donetskin "kansantasavalta" on jo jonkin aikaa valittanut varojen puutetta, tämän seikan L on myös tuonut esille keskusteltuaan siskonsa kanssa, joka työskentelee päiväkodissa ja näin palkan pitäisi tulla DNR:n puolelta kun alueen päiväkodit eivät ole enää Ukrainan hallinnon alaisuudessa. Viimeksi noin kuukausi sitten DNR maksoi takautuvasti palkkaa ja kyseessä oli käytännössä vuoden ensimmäinen palkka eli tammikuun palkka (eri asia on sitten se, että maksetaanko koskaan puuttuvien kuukausien palkkoja).
Nyt kehityksen suunta näyttää ottaneen mielenkiintoisen suunnan. L nimittäin kertoi minulle, että siskonsa oli saanut perjantaina palkkaa DNR:ltä ja mielenkiintoista tässä on se, että palkka oli maksettu Venäjän ruplissa ei siis hryvnissa, kuten tähän saakka on maksettu vaan nyt palkka oli tullut ruplissa. Onko tämä sitten merkki siitä, että "kansantasavallat" todella päättävät siirtyä hryvnista rupliin - kuten aiemmin kevättalvella olivat uhanneet ja jos on niin mikä vaikutus sillä on kaupankäyntiin ja etenkin asukkaiden mahdollisuuteen matkustaa Ukrainan puolelle tekemään tärkeitä ostoksia (nimittäin on muistettava se ettei "kansantasavaltojen" puolella ole virallista pankkitoimintaa eikä valuutanvaihtoa - jos epävirallisia löytyy niin kurssit ovat hyvin epäedullisia asiakkaille). Toinen asia on tietenkin se, että onko kyseessä pysyvä toiminta vai onko väliaikainen/kertaluonteinen tapahtuma. Jos kyseessä on pysyväluonteinen toiminta, tarkoittaa se sitä, että "kansantasavallat" pyrkivät entistä enemmän eroon Ukrainasta ja tulevaisuudessa yhteisen sävelen löytyminen liene vieläkin vaikeampaa.
vlad.
Eihän ne terroristit kykenee mihinkään siellä.
Samalla "Donbasantratsitista" irttisanottiin 4000 kaivosmiestä, ei ole rahoja maksaa palkat heille.
Piontkovski kirjoitti hyvän kertomuksen mm sitä että Putler halua jättää nämä kvasimuodostelmat lnr ja dnr Ukrainan nääntymiseksi, kun syöpäkasvain,kirjoitamalla oma perustuslakia.
- The "New Russia" in its original form for a long time closed.This happened not because Moscow has changed its intentions and become kinder to Ukraine, but simply because he failed. This project, which Putin is very serious thought in March and April of last year, was based on the inclusion of 8-10 Ukrainian regions in the new entity. And those provocations that have occurred in the Donetsk and Lugansk, also held in many other cities, among them - Odessa and Kharkiv. However, where they have failed, without having received any significant support. And, actually, "New Russia" to the so-called skukozhilas (kutistunut) Lugandoniaksi.
And Moscow has drastically changed their tactics. It is in any case not going to annex these depressed areas. They need her like a cancer inside Ukraine, sowing chaos and instability. According to the Kremlin's interpretation of the Minsk Agreement, Lugandoniya should be a part of Ukraine (Lavrov emphasizes ten times in one day both in Brussels and in Paris, and elsewhere), and thus have a right of veto on future foreign policy priorities of Ukraine. These Zakharchenko and whole heads dictate Motorola has a new Constitution of Ukraine. This is a deliberate tactic of Moscow: At today's stage of the conflict, "stick" part of the territory of Ukraine, is already inside the country to block its European choice.
- Do you think they will seek autonomy, or agree to the terms of wide decentralization proposed by Ukraine?
- His claim they have already formulated by submitting a draft of the new Constitution of Ukraine. These requirements extend much further than the question of local government. I have already said that there is a speech about the impact on the foreign policy strategy of Ukraine about the non-aligned status, federalization. These are the things demanded by Moscow. That Russia was unable to get away from Kiev, she is trying to get the Constitution written Motorola and demons.
- And what in this case indicates the accumulation of Russian troops and equipment in the Donbass?
- Accumulation of Russian troops coming. The sharp increase in the Russian military budget is fixed. But the prevailing tactic for today is the pressure on Kiev via bait preservation of "territorial integrity" of Ukraine. A demonstration of military capabilities is parallel to blackmail. And not only in Ukraine, as its Western partners, "Here, let's help us to put pressure on Kiev to agree that our interpretation of the Minsk Agreement, otherwise possible military escalation." Your Western partners that, of course, do not want to. In the case of escalation they will have greater assistance to Ukraine.And they strongly want to avoid.
- What is the probability of an escalation in the Donbass in the near future is low?
- In the near future - no. In any case, at least until the decision of the European Union on the renewal or non-renewal of sanctions. Now Moscow declared the so-called new policy of peaceful coexistence with the West. She was very frank formulated into a kind of docking article Lukyanova (Fyodor Lukyanov, the Russian zhurnalista.- "apostrophe") on April 16 in "Moscow Times": "Putin wants peaceful coexistence with the West". Curiously, the key provisions of this article have been omitted in its Russian translation. That is how the Russian public would not be aware of them. This is a direct appeal to the West, where Lukyanov explicitly recognizes that further military escalation in Russia would, as he writes, "dangerous and extremely expensive" (and extremely dangerous zatratnoy.- "apostrophe"). It offers a deal to the West: the Crimea and ours, and we keep on Lugandoniey its influence, but then we do not go.
And it is very pleasant to the West. The reaction to this peaceful coexistence was a "fantastic"
visit Kerry (John Kerry, US Secretary of State in Sochi.- "apostrophe"), to which he asked for, what with great pleasure to write the Russian press. There, at a press conference, he happily chimed Lavrov threatened finger Poroshenko, the word "Crimea" was never uttered. In general, he behaved as we would like Moscow in these parameters of the new peaceful coexistence.So on today's agenda - peace offensive at the same time a show of force, "if you do not respond to our peaceful aspirations may follow a further escalation of the conflict."
- What do you think about the assumption that during the last visit of John Kerry and the Victoria Nuland in Sochi and Moscow, respectively, between Russia and the United States could be concluded any agreements that do not meet the interests of Ukraine?
- The fact that diplomatic activity suggests a new form of relations. After all, a form of opposition to the West of the Russian Federation was the isolation of the Putin regime. Think of two television images: the first - two months ago Lavrov at the Munich conference, where the audience just laughed at him and actually driven from the scene, and they were top experts, international security experts, politicians, and the second - a press conference in Sochi Kerry. There Lavrov via Russian journalists simply mocked him and drove him into a corner. This is a completely different formats.Moscow seduced the West the opportunity to declare that a peaceful settlement is achieved. "So we, the West, their heroic support of Ukraine have ensured that Moscow will not go further. But what captured, it has captured."
http://translate.google.fi/translate?hl=fi&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.kasparov.ru/material.php?id=5565B2C411046
Tämä on googlen käännös joihin tehnyt minimaalisia muutoksia.
