Tämä mainiota. Itsekin luulin aikaisemmin ettei näitä tulisi varastoista. Tarkemmin ottaen ilmeisesti 100 kpl tulisi "heti" ja toiset 100 kpl myöhemmin.
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/04/8/7397063/
Ukrainan konflikti/sota
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/04/8/7397063/
Ohjus-tiedustelija
Ylipäällikkö
Hämmentävää touhua, näyttää siltä että pieni pelko koko ajan persuksissa että vihollinen vielä kohtuu lähellä tai epäsuoran uhka leijuu yllä, silti pussitetaan vihollisen ruumiita mukaan
Aseet kerätään talteen toki ja ymmärtäisin jos sieltä olisi kerätty samalla pari omaa kaatunutta matkaan, mutta vihollisen raatojen keräilyä en tuossa kohtaa ymmärrä kyllä ollenkaan
Voisiko olla omia aikaisemmin kaatuneita, kaksihan niitä pusseja taitaa vain lähteä kärriin kyytiin...
Olet oikeassa, youtuben kuvaustekstistä käännettynä:Hämmentävää touhua, näyttää siltä että pieni pelko koko ajan persuksissa että vihollinen vielä kohtuu lähellä tai epäsuoran uhka leijuu yllä, silti pussitetaan vihollisen ruumiita mukaan
Voisiko olla omia aikaisemmin kaatuneita, kaksihan niitä pusseja taitaa vain lähteä kärriin kyytiin...
Tosin kyllä tuosta videosta saa vaikutelman, että pussittavat myös ryssiä, mutta mukaan lähtee vain omat.
ajs178
Respected Leader
Olin tänään kävelyllä ja aurinko paistoi mukavasti. Täällä Härmässäkin jo näyttäisi maa olevan kuivumaan päin, saati sitten etelämpänä Ukrainassa. Tuli sellainen etiäinen ja fiilis, että kohta alkaa tapahtua rintamalla. Ukrainan vastahyökkäys enää päivien tai viikkojen päässä, missään nimessä ei kuukausien. Saa nähdä, onko tunne oikea. Nyt on näytön paikka Ukrainalla. Menestystä on pakko tulla tai lännen tuki voi loppua. IT-ohjukset loppumassa toukokuun puolivälissä, sitä ennen on siis saatava ryssä liikekannalle juoksemaan kotiaan kohti. Ja sitten jyrättävä päälle Mustanmeren rannalle saakka. Käänne tulossa, kyllä merkit on ilmassa nyt.
ddude
Majuri
Omaan silmään näyttää vähän pahalta kun luukut auki ja ukkoa vielä katolla, jää mun mielestä aika vähän reserviä?Todenteolla harjoitellaan vesistön ylityksiä
moikkari
Luutnantti
Niin artikkelissa annetaan ymmärtää:
Tiet Bahmuttiin niin tukossa ettei saatu tankkeja sinne, mutta tunneleilla huollettiin joukkoja. Kun tiet hellitti Ukraina sai siirrettyä Bahmuttiin tankkeja. Sitten tankkien avulla peruutetaan tuhoten ryssän hyökkäyskärkeä.
"Having lost at least 2,000 tanks in its 14-month wider war on Ukraine, and struggling to source the high-tech components its needs to build new tanks, Russia has been pulling out of long-term storage hundreds of 60-year-old T-62s and 70-year-old T-55s. Tanks that were obsolete decades ago. A 41-ton T-62 with its 115-millimeter smoothbore gun, or a 40-ton T-55 with its 100-millimeter rifled gun, isn’t just easier for Russian industry to restore than a newer T-90 or T-72 is—after all, the T-62 or T-55 requires fewer ball bearings and electronic components. The older tank also is easier for its crew to operate.
That has training implications. "The crews prepare for them [the T-55s and T-62s] in a shorter timeframe," Ukrainian commentator Oleksandr Kovalenko said.
The T-55 and T-62 are from a generation of Soviet tanks before the introduction of automatic gun-loaders, sophisticated fire-controls and crew layouts that allow a gunner and commander independently to search for targets. The upside is that a four-person crew could learn to operate its old tank fast—as in, after just a few weeks of training. The downside, of course, is that the crew still is riding in an obsolete tank. A T-55 or T-62 is easier to use because it’s old, crude tech. Old, crude tech that might not last long in combat—and which might end up getting new tankers killed faster.
Still, the Russians seem to appreciate the old tanks’ less demanding training requirement. After all, many of those 2,000 tanks they’ve lost in Ukraine took their crews with them when they blew up. It’s possible thousands of experienced Russian tankers have died in the wider war; replacing them might be as difficult as replacing their tanks is."
Kovalenko noted Russia’s growing shortage of good tank crews when he tracked a batch of a dozen restored T-72s, T-80s and T-90s reaching a Russian army motorized unit near Svatove in eastern Ukraine. "The most interesting thing is that there are no crews in the unit who can operate these tanks," Kovalenko said. Assigning new crews to old tanks might seem like a solution to this problem. In reality, it’s a short-term expedient—and a self-defeating one, at that.
It’s possible to upgrade the optics in a T-55 or T-62 by swapping out the 70-year-old TSh 2-22 gunner’s sight for a 1PN96MT-02 analog sight that, while not as sophisticated as the state-of-the-art Sosna-U digital sight is, at least is new and reliable. It also is possible to boost an older tank’s protection by bolting reactive armor blocks onto the hull and turret. But there’s very little Russian industry can do to improve a T-55 or T-62’s main gun, internal layout or turret-hull integration. And all are problematic.
“The T-62's most significant weakness is its slow rate of fire,” the U.S. Army explained in a 1979 bulletin. Where the crew of a Ukrainian T-64, Leopard 2 or M-1 can fire 10 or even 12 rounds a minute, a T-55 or T-62 crew might manage three or four rounds a minute. The reasons are myriad. “The ammunition is inconveniently stored for rapid loading,” according to the U.S. Army bulletin. “Under certain conditions, the gun must be elevated before the loader can place a new round in the breech. The automatic ejection system requires six seconds to complete a cycle.”
While the T-55 and T-62 suffer other limitations—slow turret-traverse mechanisms, for instance—the lethargic rate of fire is one constraint that’s bound to get a lot of Russian tankers killed in direct clashes with the Ukrainians. During the pivotal battle around Chernihiv in north-central Ukraine in the spring of 2022, the Ukrainian 1st Tank Brigade hid its T-64s in the forests around the city. When Russian tanks rolled past, the T-64 crews opened fire.
“Better crew training combined with short-ranged engagements where their armament was competitive, and the faster autoloader on the T-64, allowed Ukrainian tank crews to achieve significant damage against surprised Russian units,” analysts Mykhaylo Zabrodskyi, Jack Watling, Oleksandr Danylyuk and Nick Reynolds explained in a study for the Royal United Services Institute in London.
As T-55s and T-62s replace T-72s in Russian formations, the Ukrainians’ gunnery advantage only will grow. But comparing an old Russian tank to a newer Ukrainian tank really is missing the point. The Kremlin’s tank-crew crisis is a reminder that, in warfare, people matter more than machines do. Rushing new tankers through a short training course in order to squeeze them into old T-55s and T-62s and speed those tanks to the front line might create an impression of Russian strength. But it won’t win battles.
Because those crews—tank commanders, or TCs, especially—will lack experience. “It is ... important that deciders in crews and platoons (TCs and platoon leaders) have the necessary experience to allow them to react to rapidly changing future battlefields,” Billy Burnside noted in a 1979 study for the U.S. Army.
In ‘solving’ their tanker-shortage by equipping crews with obsolete tanks, the Russians might end up creating an even deeper tanker shortage—by getting a bunch of four-man T-55 and T-62 crews killed in lopsided fights with better-equipped, better-trained Ukrainian forces."
www.forbes.com
That has training implications. "The crews prepare for them [the T-55s and T-62s] in a shorter timeframe," Ukrainian commentator Oleksandr Kovalenko said.
The T-55 and T-62 are from a generation of Soviet tanks before the introduction of automatic gun-loaders, sophisticated fire-controls and crew layouts that allow a gunner and commander independently to search for targets. The upside is that a four-person crew could learn to operate its old tank fast—as in, after just a few weeks of training. The downside, of course, is that the crew still is riding in an obsolete tank. A T-55 or T-62 is easier to use because it’s old, crude tech. Old, crude tech that might not last long in combat—and which might end up getting new tankers killed faster.
Still, the Russians seem to appreciate the old tanks’ less demanding training requirement. After all, many of those 2,000 tanks they’ve lost in Ukraine took their crews with them when they blew up. It’s possible thousands of experienced Russian tankers have died in the wider war; replacing them might be as difficult as replacing their tanks is."
Kovalenko noted Russia’s growing shortage of good tank crews when he tracked a batch of a dozen restored T-72s, T-80s and T-90s reaching a Russian army motorized unit near Svatove in eastern Ukraine. "The most interesting thing is that there are no crews in the unit who can operate these tanks," Kovalenko said. Assigning new crews to old tanks might seem like a solution to this problem. In reality, it’s a short-term expedient—and a self-defeating one, at that.
It’s possible to upgrade the optics in a T-55 or T-62 by swapping out the 70-year-old TSh 2-22 gunner’s sight for a 1PN96MT-02 analog sight that, while not as sophisticated as the state-of-the-art Sosna-U digital sight is, at least is new and reliable. It also is possible to boost an older tank’s protection by bolting reactive armor blocks onto the hull and turret. But there’s very little Russian industry can do to improve a T-55 or T-62’s main gun, internal layout or turret-hull integration. And all are problematic.
“The T-62's most significant weakness is its slow rate of fire,” the U.S. Army explained in a 1979 bulletin. Where the crew of a Ukrainian T-64, Leopard 2 or M-1 can fire 10 or even 12 rounds a minute, a T-55 or T-62 crew might manage three or four rounds a minute. The reasons are myriad. “The ammunition is inconveniently stored for rapid loading,” according to the U.S. Army bulletin. “Under certain conditions, the gun must be elevated before the loader can place a new round in the breech. The automatic ejection system requires six seconds to complete a cycle.”
While the T-55 and T-62 suffer other limitations—slow turret-traverse mechanisms, for instance—the lethargic rate of fire is one constraint that’s bound to get a lot of Russian tankers killed in direct clashes with the Ukrainians. During the pivotal battle around Chernihiv in north-central Ukraine in the spring of 2022, the Ukrainian 1st Tank Brigade hid its T-64s in the forests around the city. When Russian tanks rolled past, the T-64 crews opened fire.
“Better crew training combined with short-ranged engagements where their armament was competitive, and the faster autoloader on the T-64, allowed Ukrainian tank crews to achieve significant damage against surprised Russian units,” analysts Mykhaylo Zabrodskyi, Jack Watling, Oleksandr Danylyuk and Nick Reynolds explained in a study for the Royal United Services Institute in London.
As T-55s and T-62s replace T-72s in Russian formations, the Ukrainians’ gunnery advantage only will grow. But comparing an old Russian tank to a newer Ukrainian tank really is missing the point. The Kremlin’s tank-crew crisis is a reminder that, in warfare, people matter more than machines do. Rushing new tankers through a short training course in order to squeeze them into old T-55s and T-62s and speed those tanks to the front line might create an impression of Russian strength. But it won’t win battles.
Because those crews—tank commanders, or TCs, especially—will lack experience. “It is ... important that deciders in crews and platoons (TCs and platoon leaders) have the necessary experience to allow them to react to rapidly changing future battlefields,” Billy Burnside noted in a 1979 study for the U.S. Army.
In ‘solving’ their tanker-shortage by equipping crews with obsolete tanks, the Russians might end up creating an even deeper tanker shortage—by getting a bunch of four-man T-55 and T-62 crews killed in lopsided fights with better-equipped, better-trained Ukrainian forces."
The Russians Aren’t Just Running Out Of Tanks—They’re Running Out Of Tank Crews, Too. And It’s Going To Get Worse.
It’s possible thousands of experienced Russian tankers have died in the wider war; replacing them might be as difficult as replacing their tanks is.
www.forbes.com
Viimeksi muokattu:
missileman
Kenraali
Bakhmut ilmeisesti vielä pitää
missileman
Kenraali
Olisko maskirovkaa kuitenkin, tuo ammusten loppuminen
missileman
Kenraali
Marinka, iso kysymys tulee olemaan kannattaako näitä tuhottuja alueita uudelleenrakentaa vai mikä olisi paras kohtalo näille. Ryssät ei varmasti ala näistä maksumiehiksi.
Asia pitää hoitaa niin, että ryssät eivät tule osaksi kansainvälistä yhteisöä ennen kuin ovat täysimääräisesti korvanneet tekemänsä tuhot korkoineen.
Juuri näin
Venäjä pitää laittaa maksumieheksi kaikkeen Ukrainan sotaan liittyviin kuluihin. Kun heillä on kuulemma millä mällätä, niin luonnonvarat verolle niin kauan kuin viimeinen monttu, ja Ukraina pelastamiseen lahjoitettu panssari on maksettu.
Vain näin voidaan tulevaisuudessa estää järjetön voiman käyttö.
Ihmiset määrittelevät pelisäännöt, miten syyllinen tuomitaan.
Kyllä, mutta kuljettajan luukkujen auki pitäminen kuljettajan kannalta ymmärrettävää.
Idea. Takakannen päälle laatikko, jossa itsetäyttyvä kumivene miehistölle. Eli laatikko auki, laukaisinta painaessa painesäiliöstä täyttyvä kumivene, jossa hinausköysi valmiiksi kiinni. Ukot kumiveneeseen hinaukseen ja vesistön yli. Vaunu kevenisi n. tuhannella kilolla.
Jukkapukka
Luutnantti
Meddun pääsiäisripulointi. Siinähän toivovat, että Eurooppa ja USA hajoavat auttaessaan Ukrainaa.
www.iltalehti.fi
Dmitri Medvedev: Ukraina lakkaa olemasta
Entinen presidentti Dmitri Medvedev sanoo katkeransävyisessä blogissaan Euroopan kuihtuvan ja Yhdysvaltojen ajautuvan sisäiseen kaaokseen Ukrainan sodan takia.
www.iltalehti.fi