Uutisia Kiinasta

Kiina uuden ryhmittää Maavoimansa.
3 Armejaryhmää Itään, 2 etelään 2 länteen, 3 pohjoiseen ja 3 keskelle.
Lisäksi entisestä 15.

Maahanlaskuarmeijasta tulee 84. Maahanlasku armejaryhmä ja siinä olisi "airborne assault group" joka olisi kuin U.S. 101st Airborne Division.

En tiedä onko käännöksessä vika vai toimittajissa mutta ensimmäinen lainaus puhuu armeijaryhmästä "armygroup" ja toinen armeijakunnasta "Armycorps".
Luotan viralliseen eli ensimmäiseen.


China to regroup PLA Army

In-Depth Coverage

People's Daily Online

(Xinhua) 19:38, April 27, 2017

BEIJING, April 27 (Xinhua) -- The Central Military Commission has decided to reorganize the army groups of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) Army, Defense Ministry spokesperson Yang Yujun said Thursday.

Yang said that 13 army groups will be formed from the previous 18.
http://en.people.cn/n3/2017/0427/c90000-9208668.html

Ja analyysi tästä.

2017/04/24 14:34:30

Hong Kong, April 24 (CNA) Mainland China's 18 army corps have been reorganized into 13 army corps, according to a military expert in Hong Kong.

The expert, Leung Kwok-leung (梁國樑), told a CNA reporter on Monday that the 13 new army corps of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) will also use new numeric designations that start from 71.

He said the PLA has had 70 army corps in its history and the new numbers are simply an extension of that tradition.

Leung also said, according to his information, the new 71st, 72nd and 73rd army corps will come under the Eastern Theater Command; the 74th and 75th under the Southern Theater Command; the 76th and 77th corps under the Western Theater Command.

Three each of the six remaining army corps fall under the Northern Theater Command and the Central Theater Command.

He also quoted sources as revealing that the PLA's 15th airborne army is likely to be upgraded as the new 84th Airborne Army Corps, an indication that mainland China is trying to improve its airborne forces.

Leung expects the new 84th Airborne Army Corps to include an airborne assault group similar to that of the U.S. 101st Airborne Division.

Meanwhile, a military website run by Beijing's Global Times reported today that the new vice head of the 76th Army Corps visited a commemoration of the Red Army in Gansu days ago.

This was the first time the name of the new 76th Army Corps has been officially mentioned.

(By Stanley Cheung)
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/l...424-cna01.htm?_m=3n.002a.1998.qa0ao069zz.1u73
 
Viimeksi muokattu:
Uusi tst-heko teki ensilentonsa eilen... missä tykki?

China's new military helicopter, Z-19E, made its maiden flight today in the city of Harbin.

407E507800000578-4518716-image-a-17_1495119096952.jpg


407E507100000578-4518716-image-a-18_1495119150949.jpg


407E505C00000578-4518716-image-a-19_1495119154531.jpg


MISSÄ KÄÄNTYVÄ ASE NOKASSA?!? Ja suoja vain 12,7mm AP... hmm.


Z-19 HELICOPTER: THE ORIGINAL MODEL

Seat: Two

Length: 12m (39ft)

Height: 4.01m (13ft)

Weight: 2.3 tonnes

Maximum takeoff weight: 4.5 tonnes (Apache 64D Longbow max. ToW 10.43 tonnes)

Maximum speed: 305 kph (189 mph)

Range: 800km (497mi)

Cruising speed: 245 kph (152mph)

Source: China.com.cn
 
Uusi tst-heko teki ensilentonsa eilen... missä tykki?

China's new military helicopter, Z-19E, made its maiden flight today in the city of Harbin.

407E507800000578-4518716-image-a-17_1495119096952.jpg


407E507100000578-4518716-image-a-18_1495119150949.jpg


407E505C00000578-4518716-image-a-19_1495119154531.jpg


MISSÄ KÄÄNTYVÄ ASE NOKASSA?!? Ja suoja vain 12,7mm AP... hmm.



Z-19 HELICOPTER: THE ORIGINAL MODEL

Seat: Two

Length: 12m (39ft)

Height: 4.01m (13ft)

Weight: 2.3 tonnes

Maximum takeoff weight: 4.5 tonnes (Apache 64D Longbow max. ToW 10.43 tonnes)

Maximum speed: 305 kph (189 mph)

Range: 800km (497mi)

Cruising speed: 245 kph (152mph)

Source: China.com.cn

Kyseessä on kevythelo millä on tarkoitus käydä nuuhkimassa vihollisen liikkeitä joten se on samaa luokkaa kuin Kiowa.
 
Kyseessä on kevythelo millä on tarkoitus käydä nuuhkimassa vihollisen liikkeitä joten se on samaa luokkaa kuin Kiowa.

Tai enemmän kuten AH-1 -sarjan kopterit, kun ovat kuitenkin kohtuullisen hyvin aseistettuja. Kiinalaiset ovat vissiin ajatelleet, että eivät halua kopterin menevän tarpeeksi lähelle jotta voisivat käyttää tykkiä, joten eivät ruvenneet siihen sellaista suunnittelemaan (mahdollisesti eivät myöskään onnistuneet kopioimaan sellaista).
 
Uusi tst-heko teki ensilentonsa eilen... missä tykki?

China's new military helicopter, Z-19E, made its maiden flight today in the city of Harbin.

407E507800000578-4518716-image-a-17_1495119096952.jpg


MISSÄ KÄÄNTYVÄ ASE NOKASSA?!?
Eihän esim. saksalaistenkaan Tiger tst-hekossa ole kääntyvää tykkiä nokassa, mutta siihen voi kuitenkin asentaa tykki- tai kk-podin, kuten tuohon kinuskien hyrräänkin näyttää voivan. Tärkeinhän kyky noilla taitaa kuitenkin olla ohjusten viskominen tankkien sun muiden niskaan riittävän välimatkan päästä. En menisi silti sanomaan, että on viisasta jättää nokkatykki kokonaan pois.
 
Tykki olisi kuitenkin poikkeus tuohon hommaan suunnitellussa kopterissa.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_helicopter#Observation_helicopters

Minusta kyse on kuitenkin taisteluhelosta eikä tiedustelusellaisesta.
Tässä vielä juttua Z-19E:stä:

China Wants to Sell Attack Helicopters to the World
Z-19E makes its first flight
z-19E-reuters-825x350.jpg


WIB air May 24, 2017 Tom Demerly

China18
Chinese aircraft company AVIC Harbin Aircraft Industry Group debuted its new Z-19E Black Whirlwind attack helicopter during the type’s first flight at Harbin Airport in northeastern China on May 17, 2017.

The first flight of the Z-19E, also known as the AH-19E in Chinese media, entailed a simple lift-off to hover and then several basic low-speed flight maneuvers over the airfield. The aircraft was carrying eight large, white missiles that bear resemblance to the U.S.-designed Hellfire guided missile, along with what may have been a gun pod and a launch canister for high-velocity aircraft rockets possibly analogous to the U.S. 2.75-inch folding fin aircraft rocket.

The crew arrangement seems to be similar to that on the American AH-64 Apache, where the pilot sits in the rear and the weapons operator sits in the front.

A noteworthy feature of the Z-19E is the protected, shaft-driven tail rotor assembly. This is different than the tail rotor on many attack helicopters such as the Apache, European Tiger and Russian Mi-28, all of which feature conventional, exposed tail rotors mounted outside the fuselage tail boom.

The enclosed tail rotor reduces lost thrust by ducting the drive forces generated by the rotating blades. It also reduces noise and is safer in ground operations.


The U.S. Coast Guard’s HH-65C Dolphin boasts a similar tail rotor, as does the Russian Kamov Ka-60- and Japan’s Kawasaki OH-1 light observation and attack helicopter. And enclosed tail rotor is generally more expensive to manufacture and heavier than a conventional tail rotor is.

The Z-19E represents China’s first attempt at a locally-produced, advanced attack helicopter for the export market. The People’s Liberation Army’s current primary attack helicopter is the CAIC Z-10, which is made in China but is of largely Russian design. The Z-10 is an older-style helicopter with an external tail rotor and a cockpit arrangement that resembles that on the Tiger attack copter.

The Chinese developed the Z-19E under a secret contract with Russian helicopter-builder Kamov. The program began in the early 2000s. The United States and Russia have been building dedicated attack helicopters since the 1960s.

Depending on cost, capabilities and import-export restrictions, the Z-19E could draw interest from African, Middle East and Asian countries that can’t afford or don’t have access to Western or Russian designs.

http://warisboring.com/china-wants-to-sell-attack-copters-to-the-world/
 
Z-19:n maksimi lentoonlähtöpaino on vain 4500kg (vert Z-10 7500kg) joten pystyykö se edes kantamaan tykkitornia? Jos laittaisivat tykkitornin, niin montako ohjusta pitäisi tiputtaa kyydistä?
 
Linkki: http://www.defensenews.com/articles...-military-capabilities-plans-base-in-pakistan

Pentagon: China ups military capabilities, plans base in Pakistan

MELBOURNE, Australia — China is continuing the rapid development of its military and power-projection capabilities, with Pakistan being touted as the likely location of its second overseas base, according to the Pentagon’s newly released report on trends and developments on China’s military.

This would follow the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, or PLA, setting up its first overseas base at Djibouti on the Horn of Africa, construction of which started in February 2016 and is expected to be completed in 2018. China previously said the base is meant “to help the navy and army further participate in United Nations peacekeeping operations, carry out escort missions in the waters near Somalia and the Gulf of Aden, and provide humanitarian assistance.”

Overseas bases will “better position the PLA to expand its participation in non-combatant evacuation operations, search-and-rescue, humanitarian assistance/disaster relief (HA/DR), and SLOC security," the report added. Although it also warned that China’s ability to build overseas bases “may be constrained by the willingness of countries to support a PLA presence in one of their ports.”

The report also noted that “China’s leaders remain focused on developing the capabilities to deter or defeat adversary power projection and counter third-party intervention,” with the PLA’s modernization program becoming more focused on missions including power projection beyond China’s periphery.

This included complex exercises that saw the People's Liberation Army Air Force deploy “more than 40 aircraft to the East China Sea and through the Miyako Strait into the Philippine Sea in its most complex long-distance strike training to date” in September 2016. The deployment included Xi’an H-6K cruise missile carriers, which the report notes would put the U.S. base in Guam within range of Chinese air-launched cruise missiles.

The H-6K is a modernized Chinese-built, Soviet-era Tupolev Tu-16 “Badger” subsonic bomber fitted with new engines and avionics, designed primarily as a cruise missile carrier for long-range strike missions. According to the report, China’s missile programs, including its ballistic and cruise missile, are comparable to other international top-tier producers with its missile production capabilities "enhanced by upgrades to primary assembly and solid rocket motor production facilities."

This will also presumably include China’s ballistic missile defense program, highlighting that in July 2016, Chinese official media confirmed the country's intent to go forward with mid-course missile defense capabilities on both land and sea assets. The interceptor missile has been identified as the HQ-19, which is currently undergoing testing and will be used for mid-course ballistic missile defense intercepts against 3,000-kilometer ranged ballistic missiles.

The report also noted that China remains engaged in a robust surface combatant construction program for the People's Liberation Army Navy, including the continuous churning out of Type 052D fleet defense destroyers, Type 054A frigates and Type 056 corvettes at a rapid pace.

The report also briefly touched on China’s latest surface combatants, the Type 055 cruiser of the Renhai class, an estimated 10,000-ton ship that has larger missile capacity and can employ larger cruise missiles. That said, the report failed to state that open-source data has shown China is already building at least four, possibly five such ships at two different shipyards.

Overall, while the report is a useful guide to keep track of Chinese military developments, Defense News has found some notable errors or outdated information. For example, though the report mentioned the development of the Chengdu J-20 fifth-generation fighter, it failed to mention that the type had already entered low-rate production as early as the third quarter of 2016.

A quick scan also showed problems with some of the report's maps and infographics showing the PLA’s force dispositions, with two of the Navy’s key air bases on the island of Hainan omitted while another Navy air base for special missions aircraft in China’s Northern Theater Command was wrongly identified as an Air Force bomber base.
 
Back
Top