Bushmaster
Greatest Leader
Nyt voi ottaa foliohatut pois...
Uutisia Yhdysvalloista
- Viestiketjun aloittaja Museo
- Aloitus PVM
-
- Tagit
- usa yhdysvallat
Fremen
Greatest Leader
Nelja vaunua nyt modattu Trophylle, kaksi M1A1 Abrahamsia ja kaksi Strykeria... mielenkiintoista nahda tuleeko kaupat?
Walsh: Marines May Protect Tanks With Active and EW Protection Systems, Much Like Ship Self-Defense
By: Megan Eckstein
April 14, 2016 6:30 AM • Updated: April 14, 2016 7:18 AM
Cpl. Henry Estrada a gunner with 1st Tank Battalion from Lewisville, Texas, guides an M1A1 Abrams Main Battle Tank off the Landing Craft Air Cushion during rail operations at Dogu Beach, Republic of Korea, on March 15, 2016. US Marine Corps Photo
As anti-tank threats are growing increasingly sophisticated, the Marine Corps is looking at protecting its ground vehicles with active protection and electronic warfare systems to fend off incoming rounds the same way ships and planes do today.
Lt. Gen. Robert Walsh, deputy commandant for combat development and integration, said at a Senate Armed Services seapower subcommittee hearing on Wednesday that as technology proliferates, the anti-tank threat is rapidly evolving. The Navy is investing in protecting its ships and aircraft from similar threats, and Walsh said it’s time for the Marine Corps to take the same approach for its ground vehicles.
“When we start getting threats on our aircraft, our helicopters, our fixed wing aircraft, [from] infrared missiles, we quickly put out a capability to defeat those types of missiles,” he said.
“Now we’re seeing the threat on the ground changing, becoming a much more sophisticated threat on the ground. What we’ve continued to do is up-armor our capabilities on the ground, put armor on them. We’ve got to start thinking more with a higher technology capability, with vehicle protective systems, active protective systems that can defeat anti-tank guided munitions, RPGs (rocket-propelled grenades) … along with soft capability, which is the technology our aircraft have.”
To that end, the Marine Corps is partnering with the Army to test out the Israeli Trophy Active Protection System (APS). The Army is leasing four systems and will experiment with their Stryker combat vehicle and M1A2 tanks. The Marine Corps is currently modifying some of its M1A1 tanks to install mounts for the Trophy system, and the service will later work with the Army to test the protective system on the Marine tanks against anti-tank guided missiles and RPGs, he told USNI News after the hearing.
The Trophy system has both an active and a soft component. When sensors detect an incoming threat, the active system fires small rounds to deflect the threat, Walsh said, noting that “when they’re going that fast, it doesn’t take much to deflect them away.”
The soft side uses jammers in the same way ship and aircraft self-protection systems do.
“The anti-ship missiles are getting better and better, so the Navy’s having to continue to put better capabilities on the ships to be able to defeat it,” he said, with the Marine Corps now seeing those same advances in anti-tank technologies.
“I think that’s the side we’re really going to benefit from the Navy capabilities, because the Navy has some very good EW (electronic warfare) capabilities. So getting into our warfare centers and working with the Navy on how to get better at electronic warfare capabilities, that’s the soft side of it.”
Walsh added that the Marines are also investing in unmanned aerial systems to help with reconnaissance, to try to find the enemy before they can launch missiles at American tanks. Even with more eyes in the sky, the enemy will still be able to fire off shots, and Walsh said the Marines need to do better than simply adding more armor to protect personnel inside from blasts.
With all the extra armor, the vehicles are getting so heavy that mobility is suffering, he said.
“And certainly being with the Navy, coming from the sea, we want to be able to be lighter and quicker,” Walsh said.
“And so I think technology is getting smaller – we talk about that all the time – the technology and processors are getting smaller to allow us to put it … on each individual vehicle in the future.”
More broadly, Walsh said at the hearing that the Marine Corps is in the midst of conducting a force structure assessment to understand what type of force and of what size it will need to succeed in the future operating environment, much like the Navy is conducting an FSA to inform future ship count requirements.
“In fact I just left the commandant and senior leadership just before I came over here, and we’re conducting our force structure assessment, and it’s all projecting into that future operating environment,” Walsh told the senators.
“And we see this as probably the most complex operating environment, both at the lower end of the spectrum and certainly at the higher end of the spectrum. And we have not really seen since the Cold War these types of capabilities, when you start getting into precision weapons, ability to sense the area and also working in the electromagnetic spectrum.”
https://news.usni.org/2016/04/14/wa...rotection-systems-much-like-ship-self-defense
hyva kommentti lisaksi:
Ed L Secundius • a day ago
Merkava Mk-4, the ballistic protection is modular and provides more effective protection against modern threats, involving both protection efficiency and coverage area. Above all, the ballistic protection includes roof protection, which provides a capability against overhead attacks. Unlike most Tanks, the Merkava primary design criteria was crew survivability. Every part of the overall design is expected to contribute to helping the crew survive. The engine is in the front to provide protection to the crew. There is a special protective umbrella for the tank commander to enable protection from indirect fire with the hatches open. A nice feature for urban warfare. Special "spaced armor" is in use along with protected fuel and ammo compartments. Rear ammunition stowage is combined with a rear entrance and exit.
Walsh: Marines May Protect Tanks With Active and EW Protection Systems, Much Like Ship Self-Defense
By: Megan Eckstein
April 14, 2016 6:30 AM • Updated: April 14, 2016 7:18 AM
Cpl. Henry Estrada a gunner with 1st Tank Battalion from Lewisville, Texas, guides an M1A1 Abrams Main Battle Tank off the Landing Craft Air Cushion during rail operations at Dogu Beach, Republic of Korea, on March 15, 2016. US Marine Corps Photo
As anti-tank threats are growing increasingly sophisticated, the Marine Corps is looking at protecting its ground vehicles with active protection and electronic warfare systems to fend off incoming rounds the same way ships and planes do today.
Lt. Gen. Robert Walsh, deputy commandant for combat development and integration, said at a Senate Armed Services seapower subcommittee hearing on Wednesday that as technology proliferates, the anti-tank threat is rapidly evolving. The Navy is investing in protecting its ships and aircraft from similar threats, and Walsh said it’s time for the Marine Corps to take the same approach for its ground vehicles.
“When we start getting threats on our aircraft, our helicopters, our fixed wing aircraft, [from] infrared missiles, we quickly put out a capability to defeat those types of missiles,” he said.
“Now we’re seeing the threat on the ground changing, becoming a much more sophisticated threat on the ground. What we’ve continued to do is up-armor our capabilities on the ground, put armor on them. We’ve got to start thinking more with a higher technology capability, with vehicle protective systems, active protective systems that can defeat anti-tank guided munitions, RPGs (rocket-propelled grenades) … along with soft capability, which is the technology our aircraft have.”
To that end, the Marine Corps is partnering with the Army to test out the Israeli Trophy Active Protection System (APS). The Army is leasing four systems and will experiment with their Stryker combat vehicle and M1A2 tanks. The Marine Corps is currently modifying some of its M1A1 tanks to install mounts for the Trophy system, and the service will later work with the Army to test the protective system on the Marine tanks against anti-tank guided missiles and RPGs, he told USNI News after the hearing.
The Trophy system has both an active and a soft component. When sensors detect an incoming threat, the active system fires small rounds to deflect the threat, Walsh said, noting that “when they’re going that fast, it doesn’t take much to deflect them away.”
The soft side uses jammers in the same way ship and aircraft self-protection systems do.
“The anti-ship missiles are getting better and better, so the Navy’s having to continue to put better capabilities on the ships to be able to defeat it,” he said, with the Marine Corps now seeing those same advances in anti-tank technologies.
“I think that’s the side we’re really going to benefit from the Navy capabilities, because the Navy has some very good EW (electronic warfare) capabilities. So getting into our warfare centers and working with the Navy on how to get better at electronic warfare capabilities, that’s the soft side of it.”
Walsh added that the Marines are also investing in unmanned aerial systems to help with reconnaissance, to try to find the enemy before they can launch missiles at American tanks. Even with more eyes in the sky, the enemy will still be able to fire off shots, and Walsh said the Marines need to do better than simply adding more armor to protect personnel inside from blasts.
With all the extra armor, the vehicles are getting so heavy that mobility is suffering, he said.
“And certainly being with the Navy, coming from the sea, we want to be able to be lighter and quicker,” Walsh said.
“And so I think technology is getting smaller – we talk about that all the time – the technology and processors are getting smaller to allow us to put it … on each individual vehicle in the future.”
More broadly, Walsh said at the hearing that the Marine Corps is in the midst of conducting a force structure assessment to understand what type of force and of what size it will need to succeed in the future operating environment, much like the Navy is conducting an FSA to inform future ship count requirements.
“In fact I just left the commandant and senior leadership just before I came over here, and we’re conducting our force structure assessment, and it’s all projecting into that future operating environment,” Walsh told the senators.
“And we see this as probably the most complex operating environment, both at the lower end of the spectrum and certainly at the higher end of the spectrum. And we have not really seen since the Cold War these types of capabilities, when you start getting into precision weapons, ability to sense the area and also working in the electromagnetic spectrum.”
https://news.usni.org/2016/04/14/wa...rotection-systems-much-like-ship-self-defense
hyva kommentti lisaksi:
Ed L Secundius • a day ago
Merkava Mk-4, the ballistic protection is modular and provides more effective protection against modern threats, involving both protection efficiency and coverage area. Above all, the ballistic protection includes roof protection, which provides a capability against overhead attacks. Unlike most Tanks, the Merkava primary design criteria was crew survivability. Every part of the overall design is expected to contribute to helping the crew survive. The engine is in the front to provide protection to the crew. There is a special protective umbrella for the tank commander to enable protection from indirect fire with the hatches open. A nice feature for urban warfare. Special "spaced armor" is in use along with protected fuel and ammo compartments. Rear ammunition stowage is combined with a rear entrance and exit.
Bushmaster
Greatest Leader
Nelja vaunua nyt modattu Trophylle, kaksi M1A1 Abrahamsia ja kaksi Strykeria... mielenkiintoista nahda tuleeko kaupat?
Walsh: Marines May Protect Tanks With Active and EW Protection Systems, Much Like Ship Self-Defense
By: Megan Eckstein
April 14, 2016 6:30 AM • Updated: April 14, 2016 7:18 AM
Cpl. Henry Estrada a gunner with 1st Tank Battalion from Lewisville, Texas, guides an M1A1 Abrams Main Battle Tank off the Landing Craft Air Cushion during rail operations at Dogu Beach, Republic of Korea, on March 15, 2016. US Marine Corps Photo
As anti-tank threats are growing increasingly sophisticated, the Marine Corps is looking at protecting its ground vehicles with active protection and electronic warfare systems to fend off incoming rounds the same way ships and planes do today.
Lt. Gen. Robert Walsh, deputy commandant for combat development and integration, said at a Senate Armed Services seapower subcommittee hearing on Wednesday that as technology proliferates, the anti-tank threat is rapidly evolving. The Navy is investing in protecting its ships and aircraft from similar threats, and Walsh said it’s time for the Marine Corps to take the same approach for its ground vehicles.
“When we start getting threats on our aircraft, our helicopters, our fixed wing aircraft, [from] infrared missiles, we quickly put out a capability to defeat those types of missiles,” he said.
“Now we’re seeing the threat on the ground changing, becoming a much more sophisticated threat on the ground. What we’ve continued to do is up-armor our capabilities on the ground, put armor on them. We’ve got to start thinking more with a higher technology capability, with vehicle protective systems, active protective systems that can defeat anti-tank guided munitions, RPGs (rocket-propelled grenades) … along with soft capability, which is the technology our aircraft have.”
To that end, the Marine Corps is partnering with the Army to test out the Israeli Trophy Active Protection System (APS). The Army is leasing four systems and will experiment with their Stryker combat vehicle and M1A2 tanks. The Marine Corps is currently modifying some of its M1A1 tanks to install mounts for the Trophy system, and the service will later work with the Army to test the protective system on the Marine tanks against anti-tank guided missiles and RPGs, he told USNI News after the hearing.
The Trophy system has both an active and a soft component. When sensors detect an incoming threat, the active system fires small rounds to deflect the threat, Walsh said, noting that “when they’re going that fast, it doesn’t take much to deflect them away.”
The soft side uses jammers in the same way ship and aircraft self-protection systems do.
“The anti-ship missiles are getting better and better, so the Navy’s having to continue to put better capabilities on the ships to be able to defeat it,” he said, with the Marine Corps now seeing those same advances in anti-tank technologies.
“I think that’s the side we’re really going to benefit from the Navy capabilities, because the Navy has some very good EW (electronic warfare) capabilities. So getting into our warfare centers and working with the Navy on how to get better at electronic warfare capabilities, that’s the soft side of it.”
Walsh added that the Marines are also investing in unmanned aerial systems to help with reconnaissance, to try to find the enemy before they can launch missiles at American tanks. Even with more eyes in the sky, the enemy will still be able to fire off shots, and Walsh said the Marines need to do better than simply adding more armor to protect personnel inside from blasts.
With all the extra armor, the vehicles are getting so heavy that mobility is suffering, he said.
“And certainly being with the Navy, coming from the sea, we want to be able to be lighter and quicker,” Walsh said.
“And so I think technology is getting smaller – we talk about that all the time – the technology and processors are getting smaller to allow us to put it … on each individual vehicle in the future.”
More broadly, Walsh said at the hearing that the Marine Corps is in the midst of conducting a force structure assessment to understand what type of force and of what size it will need to succeed in the future operating environment, much like the Navy is conducting an FSA to inform future ship count requirements.
“In fact I just left the commandant and senior leadership just before I came over here, and we’re conducting our force structure assessment, and it’s all projecting into that future operating environment,” Walsh told the senators.
“And we see this as probably the most complex operating environment, both at the lower end of the spectrum and certainly at the higher end of the spectrum. And we have not really seen since the Cold War these types of capabilities, when you start getting into precision weapons, ability to sense the area and also working in the electromagnetic spectrum.”
https://news.usni.org/2016/04/14/wa...rotection-systems-much-like-ship-self-defense
hyva kommentti lisaksi:
Ed L Secundius • a day ago
Merkava Mk-4, the ballistic protection is modular and provides more effective protection against modern threats, involving both protection efficiency and coverage area. Above all, the ballistic protection includes roof protection, which provides a capability against overhead attacks. Unlike most Tanks, the Merkava primary design criteria was crew survivability. Every part of the overall design is expected to contribute to helping the crew survive. The engine is in the front to provide protection to the crew. There is a special protective umbrella for the tank commander to enable protection from indirect fire with the hatches open. A nice feature for urban warfare. Special "spaced armor" is in use along with protected fuel and ammo compartments. Rear ammunition stowage is combined with a rear entrance and exit.
Unlike most Tanks, the Merkava primary design criteria was crew survivability. Every part of the overall design is expected to contribute to helping the crew survive. The engine is in the front to provide protection to the crew.
StepanRudanskij
Respected Leader
Olis voinut laittaa NATO-ketjuunkin.
Hiukan juttua liittyen venäläisten viimeaikseen aggressiviseen militaaritoimintaan.
Sisältö on aika pyöreää diipadaapaa FOXin parhaiden perinteiden mukaisesti. Jotain mielenkiintoista edgee kuitenkin.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4857661983001/us-weighing-military-force-against-russia-/?#sp=show-clips
Hiukan juttua liittyen venäläisten viimeaikseen aggressiviseen militaaritoimintaan.
Sisältö on aika pyöreää diipadaapaa FOXin parhaiden perinteiden mukaisesti. Jotain mielenkiintoista edgee kuitenkin.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4857661983001/us-weighing-military-force-against-russia-/?#sp=show-clips
Bushmaster
Greatest Leader
Elämme mielenkiintoisia historiallisia aikoja...
aj77
Greatest Leader
Top U.S. commander says it’s time to give Russia a taste of its own tactics
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/21/us-mulls-using-military-force-against-russia/?1
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/21/us-mulls-using-military-force-against-russia/?1
Bushmaster
Greatest Leader
lisää aiheesta....
Paljastus 9/11-iskusta: Terroristit asuivat FBI:n tiedonantajan kotona
KASPERI SUMMANEN
24 minuuttia sitten(päivitetty 18 minuuttia sitten)
http://www.verkkouutiset.fi/ulkomaat/wtc_iskut_estaminen-49536
Syyskuun 11. päivän terrori-iskuja valmisteltiin aivan amerikkalaisviranomaisten valvovien silmien alla.
Yhdysvaltojen viranomaiset olisivat voineet estää WTC:n kaksoistorneihin New Yorkissa ja puolustusministeriö Pentagoniin lähellä Washingtonia syyskuun 11. päivänä 2001 kohdistuneet terroriteot.
WTC:n tyhjä tontti New Yorkissa vuonna 2004.
(Lehtikuva/Sari Gustafsson)
Asiasta uutisoi tässä New Zealand Herald. Juttu on julkaistu alun perinnews.com.au-uutissivustolla.
Reportaasin mukaan vasta hiljattain julki tulleet tiedot paljastavat, että sarja epäonnisia sattumia ja liittovaltion poliisin FBI:n päätöksiä olla seuraamatta johtolankoja johti siihen, ettei aivan viranomaisten nenän edessä toimineita terroristeja saatu kiinni.
Kenties hurjin paljastuksista on se, että kaksi lentokoneita kaapanneista terroristeista asui samassa asunnossa FBI:n vasikan kanssa.
”Luotettu tiedonantaja”
Uusien tietojen mukaan amerikkalaisviranomaisilta meni ohi useita tilanteita, joissa hälytyksellojen olisi pitänyt soida.
Erityisesti Pentagoniin lennetyn American Airlinesin lennon 77 kaapanneistaKhalid al-Mihdharista, Nawaf al-Hazmista ja myöhemmin Hani Hanjourista olisi ollut helppo saada raksauttavia tietoja.
Al-Mihdhar ja al-Hamzi asuivat San Diegossa luotettavana pidetyn FBI:n tiedonantajan luona samaan aikaan, kun he valmistautuivat iskuihin ottamalla lentotunteja ja käymällä englanninkielen kursseilla. Myös Hanjourin uskotaan olleen tuolloin ainakin jossain määrin tekemisissä tiedoantajan kanssa.
Amerikkalaisviranomaisten myöhempien selvitysten mukaan terroristien San Diegossa viettämä aika oli tiedustelun paras mahdollisuus saada tietoa iskuista ja estää ne. FBI ei kuitenkaan toiminut.
Huumeet menivät edelle
Pääsyy sille, ettei terroristeihin kiinnitetty huomiota, oli keskittyminen huumeiden salakuljetukseen. Terrorismista oli tehty tuolloin virallisesti FBI:n ykkösprioriteetti, mutta se ei näkynyt kenttäväelle annetuissa ohjeissa tai agenttien toiminnassa. Tämä johti siihen, ettei terroriuhkaan keskitytty riittävästi.
Al-Midhar ja al-Hazmi vuokrasivat toukokuussa 2000 huoneen paikallisen muslimijohtajan Abdussattar Shaikhin kotoa. Shaikh oli värvätty FBI:n tiedonantajaksi kuusi vuotta aiemmin.
Shaikhin kontaktina pitkään toiminut agentti Steven Butler piti hänen välittämiään tietoja luotettavina.
Kun Butleria kuulusteltiin iskujen jälkeen, paljastui, että Shaikh oli kertonut kahdesta hänen asuntoonsa muuttaneesta saudimiehestä FBI-agentille jo vuonna 2000.
Shaikh oli sanonut miesten viettävän paljon aikaa moskeijassa ja luonnehtinut heitä hyviksi muslimeiksi, jotka olivat maassa asianmukaisilla papereilla.
Shaikh sanoi terroristien olevan ”hiljaisia vuokralaisia, jotka maksoivat vuokransa”. Hän kertoi heidän menevän usein ulos matkapuhelinta käyttäessään. Butler myöntää tämän olleen hänestä epäilyttävää.
Tieto ei kuitenkaan koskaan kulkenut pidemmälle. Shaikh ei kertonut miesten sukunimiä Butlerille, eikä Butler katsonut aiheelliseksi tutkia asiaa sen enempää.
Tiedustelutieto ei kulkenut
CIA pani al-Midharin ja al-Hazmin terroriepäiltyjen valvontalistalle elokuussa 2001. Tässä vaiheessa miehet olivat jo jättäneet San Diegon. FBI on myöhemmin perustellut toimintaansa sillä, ettei virastolla ollut mitään mahdollisuutta tutkia miehiä. Virastojen välinen tiedonkulku oli terrorismiasioissa kehnoa, eikä miehiä osattu epäillä vielä vuonna 2000.
Steven Butler on perustellut toimiaan muistuttamalla, ettei FBI:n kenttäagenteilla ollut vielä tuolloin pääsyä muiden tiedusteluviranomaisten kuten CIA:n ja NSA:n tietokantoihin.
NSA:lla oli tiettävästi jo silloin tietoja, jotka olisivat saattaneet valottaa jihadistien aikeita ja panna viranomaisten hälytyskellot soimaan.
STI_Tactical9mm
Kenraali
Bushmaster
Greatest Leader
Tää on Eu-vostoliiton komissareille suoraan perkeleestä...
STI_Tactical9mm
Kenraali
Tää on Eu-vostoliiton komissareille suoraan perkeleestä...
OT ALKAA:
Juu, euvostoliitossa kun on pyhä kolminaisuus: terot-siviilit-virkavalta.
Terot tappaa avuttomia(aseettomia) siiviilejä, jolla oikeutetaan poliisien lisä-oikeudet ja valtuudet ottaa kiinni siviilejä, ja samaan aikaan terot tappaa lisää siviilejä, jolloin taas lisätään virkavallan oikeuksia ja valtuuksia ottaa kiinni siviilejä ja lisätä seurantaa ja samaan aikaan ....
OT LOPPUUUUUU
Bushmaster
Greatest Leader
John Hilly
Ylipäällikkö
White House official: Israel will receive the largest military aid package in US history
After 83 senators called upon US President Barack Obama to increase the US defense aid to Israel, a senior level White House official said that the US will grant its ally in the Middle East the largest military aid package in history. The source noted that the US support is aimed at allowing Israel to maintain its technological advantage.
The US military aid package to Israel will be the largest that was given to a country ever, according to a senior level White House official. This statement comes after 83 senators sent a letter yesterday (Monday) to Obama, insisting that he increase military aid to Israel.
“We are prepared to sign an MOU [memorandum of understanding] with Israel that would constitute the largest single pledge of military assistance to any country in US history,” said the senior level official, who added that the aid package would be aimed at helping Israel maintain its technological advantage in the region.
In the letter, the senators wrote: “In light of the dramatic rise in security threats on Israel, we support a new and long-term agreement between the US and Israel. It is our responsibility to ensure that Israel is able to defend itself with the best and latest technology.”
http://www.jerusalemonline.com/news...ael&utm_campaign=MiddayNewsletter+-+Recurring
After 83 senators called upon US President Barack Obama to increase the US defense aid to Israel, a senior level White House official said that the US will grant its ally in the Middle East the largest military aid package in history. The source noted that the US support is aimed at allowing Israel to maintain its technological advantage.
The US military aid package to Israel will be the largest that was given to a country ever, according to a senior level White House official. This statement comes after 83 senators sent a letter yesterday (Monday) to Obama, insisting that he increase military aid to Israel.
“We are prepared to sign an MOU [memorandum of understanding] with Israel that would constitute the largest single pledge of military assistance to any country in US history,” said the senior level official, who added that the aid package would be aimed at helping Israel maintain its technological advantage in the region.
In the letter, the senators wrote: “In light of the dramatic rise in security threats on Israel, we support a new and long-term agreement between the US and Israel. It is our responsibility to ensure that Israel is able to defend itself with the best and latest technology.”
http://www.jerusalemonline.com/news...ael&utm_campaign=MiddayNewsletter+-+Recurring
Ohoi Amerikka, meilläkin on tapahtunut dramaattinen käänne turvallisuusympäristössä ! Tarvitsemme ehdottomasti pitkäjänteistä taloudellista apua pitääksemme yllä teknisen etumatkan, ja pystyäksemme tarvittaessa puolustamaan itseämme parhaimmalla ja uusimmalla teknologialla!
Lisäksi Pohjolan Lukko on perinteisesti pitänyt huolta myös siitä että selkämme takana on saatu kasvattaa pellavapäitä, kaivaa malmia ja vaurastua rauhassa. Tuommoinen reipas apupaketti ei olisi kovin huono sijoitus, ja sen voisi toimittaa vaikka materiaalina sekä bilateraalisena kauppana.
StepanRudanskij
Respected Leader
Mutta täällä ei ole hakattu jeesuksia ristille, ainakaan tarinan mukaan...
Bushmaster
Greatest Leader
Muutama noita on roviolla poltettu mutta ei kai se haittaa...?
Pitäisi saada USA:n suomensukuisista kerättyä vahva lobbaajayhteisö, joka käyttäisi rahaa ja kauniita sanoja kongressimiesten ja -naisten suostutteluun asiamme taakse. Kalevalaa ja Jaltan sopimusta sopivassa suhteessa että saadaan vielä syyllisyydentuntoakin heräteltyä, ja tarjotaan sielunrauhaa aneita vastaan niin siitä se lähtee...
Bushmaster
Greatest Leader
Nyt on tapahtunu oikeus eikä oikeusmurha.. Jospa tämä edesauttaa lopettamaan tai ainakin vähentämään Afagaanien poikien ja lasteraiskauksia...mitä ei ole suomen "punamummo" halunnut lopettaa on vain ollut edistämässä naisten oikeuksia aika laihoin tuloksin...
"I am real thankful for being able to continue to serve," said Martland when reached on the telephone by Fox News. "I appreciate everything Congressman Duncan Hunter and his Chief of Staff, Joe Kasper did for me."
Jospa tämä edesauttaa lopettamaan tai ainakin vähentämään Afagaanien poikien ja lasteraiskauksia...mitä ei ole suomen "punamummo" halunnut lopettaa on vain ollut edistämässä naisten oikeuksia aika laihoin tuloksin..."I am real thankful for being able to continue to serve," said Martland when reached on the telephone by Fox News. "I appreciate everything Congressman Duncan Hunter and his Chief of Staff, Joe Kasper did for me."
Bushmaster
Greatest Leader
No niin...näin USA:ssa asekieltoa ajavat vihervassarit puskevat agendaansa eteenpäin idioottimaisilla ideoilla...
katsokaa ja kuunnelkaa linkin video
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-gun-tech-despite-concerns.html?intcmp=hplnws
Obama set to push for ‘smart gun’ tech despite concerns
The Obama administration is locked and loaded for a fresh push on gun control initiatives – reportedly moving to advocate for so-called "smart gun" technology as early as Friday, despite concerns from the gun lobby.
Politico reports President Obama is set to release findings on the technology from a multi-agency review, and White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett was previewing the material to a select set of groups on Thursday.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest confirmed to reporters that the administration would be making an announcement on Friday, without going into detail.
“We'll have more that we can talk about tomorrow," he said. "… Under discussion was exploring what kind of technology could be effectively used to make guns safer. So this is something that that a variety of federal agencies have reviewed and they'll have some findings to share.”
“Smart-gun” technology overhauls guns so they can only be fired by authorized users. The multi-agency review was ordered as part of Obama’s Jan. 4 executive action on guns.
The National Rifle Association and other gun groups do not necessarily oppose the technology itself, but are concerned about any new mandates from the government requiring it. And law enforcement groups have voiced concerns about the reliability of the tech, and whether it can be trusted when needed most.
Politico quoted a source saying a mandate is not being considered at the moment – but the roll-out of the review could fuel those concerns. Earnest would not say Thursday whether the announcement would entail simply findings or some kind of requirement.
The president’s January order had directed the departments of Defense, Justice and Homeland Security to prepare a report “outlining a research-and-development strategy designed to expedite the real-world deployment of such technology for use in practice.”
The Department of Justice’s National Institute of Justice now plans to announce in the Federal Register on Friday that it is seeking “an objective demonstration of the reliability of firearms available today with advanced gun safety technology integrated into the firearm.”
Most of the concerns revolve around the safety of the technology and how it will be tested.
“Police officers in general, federal officers in particular, shouldn’t be asked to be the guinea pigs in evaluating a firearm that nobody’s even seen yet,” James Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, told Politico.
During a town hall days after his executive actions, Obama erroneously claimed smart gun technology “has not been developed primarily because it has been blocked by the National Rifle Association (NRA) and firearms manufacturers.”
The NRA does not oppose the technology. But in responding to the president’s controversial January executive action, the group’s Institute for Legislative Action said the private market, not the government, should drive its development.
“Although NRA is not opposed to the development of new firearms technology, we do not believe the government should be picking winners and losers in the marketplace,” the statement said.
While the administration may not be pushing an executive order mandating the purchase of smart guns, Second Amendment advocates fear a slippery slope.
In 2002, New Jersey passed a law requiring all guns sold in the state be smart guns once the technology is widely available, but the technology is not an option in most places, according to NJ.com.
katsokaa ja kuunnelkaa linkin video
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-gun-tech-despite-concerns.html?intcmp=hplnws
Obama set to push for ‘smart gun’ tech despite concerns
The Obama administration is locked and loaded for a fresh push on gun control initiatives – reportedly moving to advocate for so-called "smart gun" technology as early as Friday, despite concerns from the gun lobby.
Politico reports President Obama is set to release findings on the technology from a multi-agency review, and White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett was previewing the material to a select set of groups on Thursday.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest confirmed to reporters that the administration would be making an announcement on Friday, without going into detail.
“We'll have more that we can talk about tomorrow," he said. "… Under discussion was exploring what kind of technology could be effectively used to make guns safer. So this is something that that a variety of federal agencies have reviewed and they'll have some findings to share.”
“Smart-gun” technology overhauls guns so they can only be fired by authorized users. The multi-agency review was ordered as part of Obama’s Jan. 4 executive action on guns.
The National Rifle Association and other gun groups do not necessarily oppose the technology itself, but are concerned about any new mandates from the government requiring it. And law enforcement groups have voiced concerns about the reliability of the tech, and whether it can be trusted when needed most.
Politico quoted a source saying a mandate is not being considered at the moment – but the roll-out of the review could fuel those concerns. Earnest would not say Thursday whether the announcement would entail simply findings or some kind of requirement.
The president’s January order had directed the departments of Defense, Justice and Homeland Security to prepare a report “outlining a research-and-development strategy designed to expedite the real-world deployment of such technology for use in practice.”
The Department of Justice’s National Institute of Justice now plans to announce in the Federal Register on Friday that it is seeking “an objective demonstration of the reliability of firearms available today with advanced gun safety technology integrated into the firearm.”
Most of the concerns revolve around the safety of the technology and how it will be tested.
“Police officers in general, federal officers in particular, shouldn’t be asked to be the guinea pigs in evaluating a firearm that nobody’s even seen yet,” James Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, told Politico.
During a town hall days after his executive actions, Obama erroneously claimed smart gun technology “has not been developed primarily because it has been blocked by the National Rifle Association (NRA) and firearms manufacturers.”
The NRA does not oppose the technology. But in responding to the president’s controversial January executive action, the group’s Institute for Legislative Action said the private market, not the government, should drive its development.
“Although NRA is not opposed to the development of new firearms technology, we do not believe the government should be picking winners and losers in the marketplace,” the statement said.
While the administration may not be pushing an executive order mandating the purchase of smart guns, Second Amendment advocates fear a slippery slope.
In 2002, New Jersey passed a law requiring all guns sold in the state be smart guns once the technology is widely available, but the technology is not an option in most places, according to NJ.com.
Bushmaster
Greatest Leader
Miten mahtaa suomen "asiantuntioijoiden" taustat /motiivit olla kunnossa kun Ylen toimittajakin on yllyttämässä huppupäätä toiminmaan sopimattomasti tai hanhikiven anarkustuen toiminnasta yken uutisointia on katsellut..?
http://www.iltasanomat.fi/ulkomaat/art-2000001169962.html
”Luotettavan” miehen härski vedätys paljastui: Televisiosta tuttu terrorismiasiantuntija olikin huijari
(KUVA: EPA/DENNIS BRACK - POOL, Twitter)
Julkaistu: 1.5. 6:33
YHDYSVALLAT
Wayne Simmons väitti työskennelleensä vuosikymmenten ajan tiedustelupalvelu CIA:ssa.
Entinen Fox News -uutiskanavan asiantuntija on myöntänyt sepittäneensä taustansa Yhdysvaltain keskustiedustelupalvelu CIA:n leivissä.
Marylandista kotoisin oleva Wayne Simmons, 62, väitti aiemmin työskennelleensä 27 vuoden ajan CIA:ssa. Häntä vastaan on nostettu useita syytteitä – muun muassa törkeästä petoksesta valtiota vastaan.
– Wayne Simmons on tuomittu rikoksentekijä, jolla ei ole sotilas- tai tiedustelukokemusta, syyttäjän edustajaDana Boente toteaa Yhdysvaltain oikeusministeriön tiedotteessa.
– Simmons myönsi, että hän yritti huijata itsensä asemaan, jossa häntä pyydettäisiin antamaan oikeata tiedustelutietoa sota-alueella. Hänen petoksensa maksoi valtiolle rahaa, olisi voinut vaarantaa amerikkalaishenkiä ja loukkasi niitä oikeita tiedusteluyhteisön miehiä ja naisia, jotka palvelevat tätä maata väsymättömästi.
New York Timesin mukaan Simmons vieraili säännöllisesti Fox Newsin lähetyksissä kommentoimassa tiedusteluun ja terrorismiin liittyviä asioita. Hänestä tuli näkyvä kansallisen turvallisuuden asiantuntija.
Esimerkiksi Detroitin ”alusvaatepommittajan” hyökkäyksen jälkeen Simmons kutsui presidentti Barack Obamaa ”poikakuninkaaksi”, joka toimillaan rohkaisi terroristeja ja kolmannen maailman despootteja. Vuonna 2009 Simmons puolestaan luonnehti Yhdysvaltain edustajainhuoneen puhemiestä Nancy Pelosia ”patologiseksi valehtelijaksi”.
Jos yllä oleva twiitti ei näy, voit käydä katsomassa sen täältä.Simmons oli omien sanojensa päätynyt Fox Newsin asiantuntijaksi sattumalta vuosituhannen alussa, kun häntä pyydettiin kolmen päivän mediakoulutuksen jälkeen tekemään lyhyt osuus Geraldo Riveran ohjelmaan.Simmons osoittautui kuitenkin nopeasti hyväksi puhujaksi, oli kohtelias, luotettava ja saapui paikalle aina tarvittaessa. Lehti kertoo, että mies väitti työskennelleensä CIA:ssa äärimmäisen salaisissa tehtävissä.– Kukaan ei kyennyt näkemään meitä. Kukaan ei tiennyt, keitä me olimme. Ohjelma, jossa olin mukana, oli niin musta, että se sai mustan aukon näyttämään valkoiselta.Simmons pääsi vierailemaan Pentagoniin tai Irakiin vain lähettämällä syntymäaikansa, sosiaaliturvatunnuksensa ja kuvallisen henkilökorttinsa tarkastusta varten.
New York Timesin mukaan Simmons korosti televisiossa kertaalleen jopa taustojen tarkistamisen tärkeyttä, kun väärennetyllä vihkitodistuksella Yhdysvaltojen kansalaisuuden saaneen libanonilaisnaisen kerrottiin päässeen töihin liittovaltion poliisiin (FBI) ja käsiksi salaisiksi luokiteltuihin tietoihin.
– Ilman taustojen tarkistamista, ilman tietoa palkattavasta henkilöstä ja siitä, kenet palkkaamme suojelemaan maatamme, olemme isoissa vaikeuksissa, hän huomautti.
Entinen CIA:n työntekijä Kent Clizbehaistoi palaneen käryä ja paljasti lopulta Simmonsin, joka pidätettiin viime vuoden lokakuussa.
Oikeusministeriön mukaan Simmons myönsi muun muassa johtaneensa viranomaisia harhaan vuonna 2008, kun hänet pestattiin Yhdysvaltain armeijan avuksi. Vuonna 2010 hän puolestaan toimi tiedusteluneuvonantajana Afganistanissa.
– Näiden rikosten myötä herra Simmons käytti hyväkseen muiden ihmisten luottamusta, sekä valtion sisällä että sen ulkopuolella, hyötyäkseen itse taloudellisesti. Kiitän FBI:n lahjakasta henkilökuntaa ja syyttäjiä, jotka veivät tätä juttua eteenpäin voimakkaasti ja saivat aikaan tämän päivän tunnustuksen, suitsutti FBI:n Washingtonin toimiston apulaisjohtaja Paul Abbate.
Kotiarestissa olevaa Simmonsia uhkaa vuosien vankeus, kun hän saa tuomionsa 15. heinäkuuta
John Hilly
Ylipäällikkö
Florida: FBI arrested man who planned to attack synagogue
FBI agents arrested a man who was planning on targeting a synagogue in South Florida last Friday. “Everybody says, ‘I live in a small town. It doesn’t happen here,’ but the sad part is, it happens everywhere,” said a local resident.
FBI agents arrested a man who planned to throw an explosive device at a synagogue in South Florida last Friday, according to a local television station. The terror attack was planned to take place on Friday evening, during the last day of Passover prayer service, when the synagogue was filled with congregants.
According to the report, the suspect is a man who apparently converted to Islam. “Thank God they stopped him, but had they not, it would have been such a horrible thing to happen to this neighborhood,” said Stephanie Levine, who lives near the synagogue.
Richard Levinson, another resident of the area, said that he was surprised to hear the news. “Everybody says, ‘I live in a small town. It doesn't happen here,’ but the sad part is, it happens everywhere,” he explained.
Officials within the local Jewish community asked to remind the congregants that because the suspect was arrested before he left for the synagogue, they were never in any real danger. The FBI refused to comment on the report but local news station 7News reported that the suspect will appear before a federal judge within a few days.
http://www.jerusalemonline.com/news...ida-terror-attack-at-synagogue-thwarted-20806
FBI agents arrested a man who was planning on targeting a synagogue in South Florida last Friday. “Everybody says, ‘I live in a small town. It doesn’t happen here,’ but the sad part is, it happens everywhere,” said a local resident.
FBI agents arrested a man who planned to throw an explosive device at a synagogue in South Florida last Friday, according to a local television station. The terror attack was planned to take place on Friday evening, during the last day of Passover prayer service, when the synagogue was filled with congregants.
According to the report, the suspect is a man who apparently converted to Islam. “Thank God they stopped him, but had they not, it would have been such a horrible thing to happen to this neighborhood,” said Stephanie Levine, who lives near the synagogue.
Richard Levinson, another resident of the area, said that he was surprised to hear the news. “Everybody says, ‘I live in a small town. It doesn't happen here,’ but the sad part is, it happens everywhere,” he explained.
Officials within the local Jewish community asked to remind the congregants that because the suspect was arrested before he left for the synagogue, they were never in any real danger. The FBI refused to comment on the report but local news station 7News reported that the suspect will appear before a federal judge within a few days.
http://www.jerusalemonline.com/news...ida-terror-attack-at-synagogue-thwarted-20806