Ilmasota

Ilmatorjunnan kertausharjoituksessa 1979 meille tehtiin useita Fougan rynnäköintihyökkäyksiä maalitilanteiksi.
Fouga meni korkeutta menettämättä sellaista korkkiruuvia ja vääntöjä, ettei veivi-Boforsilla pysynyt perässä.
Kyllä olisi Mustangillakin ollut vaikeuksia saada Fouga piikille, jos olisi sen taakse päässyt.

En olisi ikinä uskonut, että Fouga taipuu sillä tavalla.
 
Uskomaton juttu USS Stark -fregattia vastaan 1987 Irakin tekemästä ilmahyökkäyksestä

1*HSo_bSWkyN-248tdgfp3zg.jpeg


In 1987, a Secret Iraqi Warplane Struck an American Frigate and Killed 37 Sailors
It wasn’t a Mirage F.1 that hit USS ‘Stark’

by TOM COOPER

On May 17, 1987, the U.S. Navy guided-missile frigate USS Stark was on a patrol in the central Persian Gulf, about three kilometers outside the Iraq-declared war-zone off the coast of Iran.

Around 10:00 at night, local time, Stark came under attack from an apparent Iraqi Air Force fighter jet. Radars on the U.S. warship tracked the aircraft as it approached, and Capt. Glenn R. Brindel ordered his radioman to issue a warning and request the pilot to identify himself.

The Iraqi did not respond. Instead, he approached to a range of 35 kilometers and fired two Aerospatiale AM.39 Exocet anti-ship missiles.

Stark’s radars failed to detect the incoming missiles and thus the crew realized much too late that it was under fire. Underway at an altitude of only three meters and guided by their relatively simple active-radar homing heads, both missiles aimed for the part of the ship with the highest radar cross-section.

The first penetrated the hull directly under the bridge. It failed to explode but its unspent rocket fuel ignited and sparked a raging fire. The second Exocet hit almost the same spot and detonated, tearing a three-meter by 4.6-meter hole in the hull.

Combined, the two missiles inflicted massive damage and ignited a conflagration that burned for almost 24 hours. In order to prevent his ship from sinking, Brindel ordered the flooding of the starboard side of the ship, thus keeping the hole on the port side above water.

Supported by the destroyers USS Waddell and USS Conyngham, the ship barely managed to reach the port of Manama in Bahrain the next day. The destroyer tender USS Acadia affected temporary repairs.

Twenty-nine U.S. Navy personnel died in the initial explosion and fire, two of whom were lost at sea. Eight others died of their injuries, while 21 were injured. The Navy’s incident review board relieved Brindel of command and recommended him for court-martial. Eventually he received non-judicial punishment and retired early.


How could it happen that an Iraqi aircraft attacked Stark, and what could have been the motives and orders of the pilot, have remained unclear ever since. Baghdad claimed that the warship was underway within what it declared a war-zone, but subsequently apologized, anyway. “The pilot mistook Stark for an Iranian tanker,” the Iraqi government stated.

While not entirely trusting this version, the U.S. government never punished Iraq for the attack — Washington accepted the apology and actually assigned blame to the Iranians, instead. Official attempts to meet and interview the pilot that flew the attack failed, despite Saddam Hussein’s promises of full access.’

Some well-positioned U.S. military sources described the pilot as “green.” Combined with unsubstantiated rumors regarding an “erratic flight plan,” this bolstered Baghdad’s official explanation that the attack was a mistake.

And then there was the mystery of the attacking plane itself. U.S. intelligence was convinced that an Iraqi Mirage F.1EQ fighter-bomber, overloaded with two AM.39 Exocets, would be sluggish and hard to fly.

1*EFNV6gb6PbEBBp7jQhNnmw.jpeg

Photo showing details of damage to the hull and bridge of USS ‘Stark.’ U.S. Navy photo
Birth of an idea
The chain of events that led to the attack on Stark began in early 1986. Following a series of Iraqi air force strikes on their main oil-exporting terminal on Khark Island, the Iranians decided to reorganize their entire system of oil exports.

Instead of letting tankers chartered by foreign customers expose themselves to further Iraqi air strikes, the Iranians chartered a number of tankers on the international market and used these to shuttle crude from Khark to a new export terminal on Sirri Island in the lower Persian Gulf.

This organization seemed to offer plenty of advantages. Sirri is more than 750 kilometers from the nearest Iraqi air force base and was thus considered beyond Iraq’s reach. Furthermore, the tankers that took part in this shuttle system were crewed by professionals experienced in navigating dangerous waters around Khark — and well-trained in fighting fires and other effects of missile attacks.

Finally, Tehran expected that such ships could be better protected by interceptors of the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force and warships of the Islamic Republic of Iran Navy.

The Iranian decision took the Iraqis by surprise. Iraqi military intelligence realized that there was a surge in Iranian oil exports, and needed several weeks to find out why.

Once the intelligence came in about the new export terminal at Sirri, the Iraqi air force decided to attack. But that was easier said than done. In order to knock out the new terminal, pilots needed some idea what to aim for.


However, nobody in Iraq knew what Sirri looked like, nor what kind of terminal and air defenses to expect there. Furthermore, calculating the range to Sirri, the IRAF concluded that even its MiG-25RB Foxbat reconnaissance fighters couldn’t reach the island.

Attempting to surveil or attack the island with Mirage F.1EQs was risky. It might betray a well-guarded secret — that the Iraqi air force operated two Mirage F.1 variants, the F.1EQ-4 and F.1EQ-5, equipped for in-flight refueling.

Midway through related discussions at the Iraqi air force headquarters in Baghdad, the Iraqi Intelligence Service learned about the plan. So it happened that three of IIS’ officers walked into the headquarters and requested a meeting with the commander of the Iraqi air force, Maj. Gen. Hameed Sha’aban.

The intelligence officers made Sha’aban an offer he couldn’t refuse. The IIS had a Dassault Falcon 50 business jet configured as VIP transport and operated by its own crew. Their idea was to install reconnaissance cameras in this aircraft and then fly a clandestine sortie over Sirri Island, mimicking one of the many airliners moving along local commercial corridors.

Sha’aban accepted this idea and few days later, the Falcon 50 in question — serial number 122 , wearing Iraqi Airways markings and the civil registration YI-ALE — took off from Amman International in Jordan, carrying the usual crew of two plus three experienced Mirage pilots disguised as wealthy Arab businessmen.

Underway to Mumbai in India, it passed about 30 kilometers west of Sirri — just close enough for one of the Iraqis to take photos using a hand-held camera with a powerful optical zoom. The spies repeated the same procedure on the way back to Amman, a day later.

1*pPAAidTKEMrSZczLq1RqTw.jpeg

A Mirage F.1EQ-5 — serial number 4560 — seen during pre-delivery testing in France. Notable is one AM.39 Exocet missile painted in white, with its seeker-head section in orange. AMD photo
An urgent order
The resulting photographs enabled the Mirage pilots of No. 81 Squadron to launch a successful raid on Sirri on Aug. 12, 1986. Moreover, the affair inspired fresh thinking in the top ranks of the Iraqi air force.

One idea was to use a modified business jet to reach deep into the Persian Gulf entirely unmolested by Iranian interceptors. Furthermore, Iraqis expected that a larger aircraft would be suitable for carrying two AM.39 Exocets and thus might deliver a more powerful punch against supertankers loading crude at Iranian terminals.

This was something that appeared very important to Iraqi planners, as the sole Mirage F.1EQ variant equipped with Exocets available to the Iraqi air force at that time, the F.1EQ-5, could carry only one such missile.

And the Iraqis’ experience using AM.39s against tankers in the period 1980 to 1986 had showed that these large ships were not only quite survivable — only four merchants were outright sunk by Exocets during eight years of war — but also that a large number of Exocets were either decoyed by Iranian countermeasures, malfunctioned or failed to detonate even when they did hit their targets.

Claiming they needed a training aircraft for their Mirage F.1EQ-5 pilots, the Iraqis asked French firm Thales — the Iraqis’ primary contractor for all Mirage-related orders — to modify the Falcon 50 YI-ALE with the radar and weapons system of that Mirage variant.

1*w9F45vv1WnJeE_JOheCt3g.jpeg

A French advisor and an Iraqi air force technician next to an AM.39 Exocet missile installed underneath a Mirage F.1EQ-5, at Saddam air base in 1984. Hugues Deguillebon Collection photo
Let the bird fly
Always eager to satisfy what was then a major export customer for their arms, the French worked fast. All the conversion work was completed by January 1987.

Initial test flights by Iraqi pilots revealed a number of glitches, but the French scrambled to rectify all of these and YI-ALE was delivered to Iraq on Feb. 9, 1987 via Corsica, southern Italy, Greece and Turkey.

Among the pilots of No. 81 Squadron — the Iraqi air force’s sole unit flying Exocet-equipped Mirage F.1EQ-5s — the Falcon 50 became known as “Susanna.”

Following additional training-flights in Iraq, Susanna was prepared for its ultimate test — its first combat sortie. Early on May 17, 1987, one of the pilots from No. 81 Squadron — let’s call him “Maj. Muhammad” for the sake of convenience, because the current situation in Iraq precludes divulging his identity — re-deployed Susana from Saddam air base, better known in the United States as Qarayyah West, to Wahda air base, the former RAF Shoibiyah situated 45 kilometers southeast of Basra.

There, armorers equipped Susanna with two AM.39 Exocets.

Once the aircraft was ready, the crew began the long wait for their further orders. Shortly after the nightfall, the headquarters at Wahda air base received the coded message, “Let the bird fly,” which authorized the crew to fly an operational sortie over the Persian Gulf — in the same fashion Iraqi-operated Mirage F.1EQ-5s used to do.

Flying south through a pitch-black night, Maj. Mohammad took the usual course along what Iraqi air force pilots called “Mirage Alley,” a fictitious aerial corridor parallel to the Kuwaiti and Saudi coasts that runs all the way down to a point north of Bahrain. Then he made a 90-degree turn left toward Iran.

Approaching the Iraq-declared exclusion zone, Mohammad re-checked his position on a map and then activated his radar, initiating the search for any large surface target. Before soon, a blip appeared on his radar screen. From experience, he could say the target was a medium-size naval vessel underway along the edge of the prohibited zone, and looking as though it were about to enter it.

Mohammad concluded that the skipper of the ship in question played it smart — that he attempted to navigate along the very edge of the exclusion zone in order to avoid coming under attack. That is what prompted him to engage.

His Exocets were already hot — powered up and receiving targeting data from Susanna’s radar and weapons system — and thus ready. Mohammad flipped the cover on the stick and pressed the red trigger. He immediately sensed the heavy missile separating from the underwing pylon and heard the cracking sound of the rocket motor. A bright flash appeared in front of his aircraft, extending away and turning slightly toward the target.

By that point in time, Mohammad was a seasoned veteran with more than 1,000 hours in combat, mostly in Mirage F.1EQs. He had already fired dozens of Exocets in combat, also by night, and thus this mission wasn’t very different than his earlier experiences.

What was different about this mission however, was that Susanna was carrying two missiles. Correspondingly, Mohammad repeated the targeting procedure and fired another AM.39 before making a sharp turn to the left, returning to a northern course and heading for the safety of Wahda air base.

1*pJgsWzEHUfOPpbzhSd4Zpg.jpeg

The last appearance of Susanna. In 1989, Iraqi National T.V. aired a short documentary showing the modified Falcon 50 including the nose with a Cyrano IVM radar, a Harold pod under the centerline and one Exocet anti-ship missile under each wing. Iraqi National T.V. capture
Post scriptum
Maj. Mohammad didn’t know that he fired two missiles at a U.S. warship. He also did not know that his flight was being tracked by a U.S. Air Force E-3A Sentry radar early-warning aircraft flying over Saudi Arabia, the crew of which — upon learning about attack on Stark — asked two F-15 Eagle interceptors of the Royal Saudi Air Force to intercept and force him to land.

The Saudis declined.

While Mohammad continued a successful career with the Iraqi air force, Susanna never flew in combat again. Although Iraqis suspected that U.S. intelligence knew it was a modified Falcon 50 business jet that holed a well-armed and well-protected frigate and killed 37 American personnel, they never revealed its existence, because this would have contradicted the version of the affair the Iraqi foreign ministry had sold


In his annual review, Heyne sLater in 1987, the French began delivering the Mirage F.1EQ-6s to Iraq. This was the first variant capable of carrying two Exocets. A year later, the modified Falcon 50 received a further upgrade, which resulted in the installation of an additional fuel tank inside the cabin and a hard-point under the fuselage.

The latter made her capable of carrying the French-made Harold sideborne-looking-radar — a few of which were delivered to Iraq together with Mirage F.1EQ-6s in early 1988. In this fashion, Susanna was able of reaching the eastern Mediterranean Sea when flying from Saddam air base and carrying two Exocets on an attack or reconnaissance mission.

However, no No. 81 Squadron crew ever flew such a mission. During the Gulf War in 1991, the Iraqi air force decided to send Susanna away in an attempt to save the precious aircraft. Susanna flew to Iran … and hasn’t been seen in public since.


https://warisboring.com/in-1987-a-s...and-killed-37-sailors-b341a948fa21#.uxf6095mi
 
Lisää War is Boring -sivustolta. Swordfishit, jotka vaurioittivat Bismarckin peräsimen ympäriajokuntoon
1*Wr-Fd6szP6Zab8ENk1ZusQ.jpeg

Swordfish torpedo-bombers attack battleship ‘Bismarck’ in May 1941. Image copyright — Dennis Andrews

In 1941, Royal Navy Biplanes Crippled the World’s Most Powerful Warship
Iain Ballantyne’s new book recounts daring air raid
In Bismarck: 24 Hours to Doom, historian Iain Ballantyne lays out in an almost cinematic style how the German high-seas raider met her match during a contest of steel versus struts and canvas.

It was the most unlikely of tales — fragile, supposedly obsolete Swordfish biplanes against the modern battlewagon Bismarck, at the time the most powerful warship in the world.

In this specially-adapted extract from the book, we ride with Canadian-born Fleet Air Arm aviator Terry Goddard, the observer of a Swordfish torpedo-bomber sent to try and cripple Bismarck on the evening of May 26, 1941.

This inside account of the attack was created using the transcript of hours of on-camera interviews filmed for a project by Iain Ballantyne. It documents the last testimony of a small Band of Brothers who experienced combat against Bismarck.

by IAIN BALLANTYNE

May 26, 1941–7:00 PM
It is time for another set of contenders to climb into the ring for a round with the heavyweight. The battle-cruiser HMS Hood tried on 24 May and was blown apart. Three days later aviators aboard the carrier HMS Ark Royal are being called forward, asked to inflict some kind of decisive blow to slow down Bismarck.

The Swordfish is deceptively antiquated-looking. Though a biplane that chugs through the air sounding like an aerial tractor, it is not actually that old, having entered Fleet Air Arm service in 1937.

It won its spurs in late 1940 by knocking out Italian battleships in Taranto harbor. The first U-boat sunk in the Second World War by the British was courtesy of a Swordfish using bombs. It is as a torpedo-bomber that it will achieve new fame in May 1941.

Slow, with only a top speed of 138 miles per hour, its two wings give it incredible lift. A monoplane needs around 30 knots of wind across the flight-deck to take off from a carrier. The Swordfish can take off from a vessel at anchor (and even into the teeth of gale).

Constructed from wood, canvas and metal struts, it can survive hits that will destroy metal skinned aircraft, for the simple reason that cannon shells and bullets pass right through it.

After the mission briefing for the attack on Bismarck comes the sitting and waiting for take-off. It is inevitable people ponder their mortality and chances of survival. Terry Goddard recognizes that dreadful weather conditions will not be a barrier to the mission.

“We knew perfectly well we were gonna fly, because if we didn’t fly there would be no tomorrow for us. We had to fly and weather be darned.”

The aircrews feel the weight of expectation, of history itself — the fate of the Navy and the nation, also the Fleet Air Arm’s honor all pressing down on their shoulders.

“It is the sitting around that gnaws at you. You’re thinking rather than doing, which is worrisome. Once you start doing things the worry disappears. It must be tough on God. In war there aren’t any atheists — both sides are asking God for help. Most of us say prayers for him to help us. I know I did. Often. Fortunately he was on my side.”

Fifteen Swordfish are ranged on the flight-deck, herring bone fashion, all fueled up and each armed with a single 18-inch torpedo, ready to go.

1*nyZTBilSlYVLjwL6yaKA1A.jpeg

HMS ‘Ark Royal’ in World War II, with a Swordfish taking off as others fly past. U.S. Naval History & Heritage Command photo
7:10 PM
With waves crashing over Ark Royal’s bows, the Swordfish are launched, clawing their way into the sky.

“One by one, the batsman, the deck control officer, leads you forward — and you just sit and wait, look at the island waiting for the green flag and away you go. The ship is steering into wind, actually on this occasion slowed down, so there wasn’t too much wind going over the deck. There’s green water coming over the bow.

“In my aircraft — Swordfish 5K — Stan Keane was the pilot, I was the navigator and Milliner was the air gunner. He was responsible for working the radio. I’m responsible for getting us there and Stan is responsible for flying the aircraft and carrying out the attack.

“The ship was taking green water. The bow was going up 60 feet and down. It was raining, windy and the ship was rolling and pitching but there was no problem in take off, we were airborne before we passed the island.”

Once in the air, the crew of Swordfish 5K formulates a plan of attack, though communication within the cockpit is difficult, what with a 110-knot wind and roar of the aircraft’s engine. They shout at each other down an interconnecting rubber voice pipe.


8:47 PM
Battling the gale, blown sideways, almost negating their forward momentum, the Swordfish drop from the clouds to make their attack runs.

As they sight oncoming aircraft, lookouts aboard Bismarck scream, “Alarm!” Klaxons blare throughout the German battleship.

Bismarck takes violent evasive action, her anti-aircraft guns hurling a storm of steel at the British biplanes. Bismarck even fires her main 15-inch guns, the shells sending up tall plumes of spray, hoping to literally knock Swordfish out of the sky. Soon Swordfish 5K will be taking her turn at jousting with the enemy, provided she can find the target. Terry Goddard looks anxiously over the side of the cockpit for some sign of Bismarck.

“The whole aircraft shook as if there were a number of express trains roaring by us. We figured Bismarck had opened fire on us. In actual fact she had opened fire on [the nearby cruiser] Sheffield, but … we had found her. So, down we went. Ice was peeling off the wings, couldn’t see a bloody thing.

“The altimeter is spinning, spinning, spinning and then we break into the clear about 600 feet and there’s Bismarck on our starboard bow. She was a fire-spitting monster. Everything was coming at us and she was illuminated … awesome.

“This ship was just magnificent. It looked exactly like a battleship should, I mean scary and everything but just a beautiful ship. Once the attack has started it’s all about the pilot. The observer and the air gunner, we just stand by and get really excited watching what is going on. You are not thinking you are going to be killed, you’re thinking you’re going to hit the bastard and that’s it.

“The more you turn [the aircraft] around, and the more you frig around, the more chance they get to hit you, so we just went straight in. We got as low on the deck as we could and went straight. Bismarck was on the port side and she just got bigger and bigger. The flak is bursting over our head. Well above us. The small arms fire is pretty well all around us — and hitting us every once in a while — but we get in to drop the torpedo … do a quick turn away.

“Looking back shortly after the turn I see a large black and white explosion on the Bismarck. It is high and wide. Obviously it is a torpedo hit. There is no other aircraft anywhere near us and there is no doubt it was the torpedo we had just dropped. I tell Stan, he grunts — he’s busy doing various maneuvers on the deck — I give a message to the air gunner that we have scored a hit. Milliner thought he’d seen something too.

“Right after the attack the shooting stopped. We were in the clear. She wasn’t firing at us. Ark Royal requests us to repeat the message. Then we climb back up into the clag and this time it is about 6,000 feet that we broke clear. About five minutes later we saw another Swordfish well ahead. We increase speed, join up with him. It’s David Godfrey-Faussett [the other aircraft’s pilot] smoking a big cigar and with a smile on his face. I didn’t like his course so we broke away and we headed off on our own.”

1*EL7X0DuOdmUGRjt6Mz6LuA.jpeg

Swordfish aviator Terry Goddard aboard a Royal Navy aircraft carrier during World War II. Photo copyright — Goddard Collection
11:30 PM
With Swordfish landing back aboard Ark Royal, and their crews filing reports, it is decided the balance of probability is that Bismarck has not been damaged. This is despite claims in the briefing room by some aviators that they managed torpedo hits on the German giant.

“Command was very reluctant to accept that there were any. I told them three or four times that we had scored a hit and they ignored me. Finally, when Sheffield sent a report that Bismarck was steering northeast, they suddenly realized that something had happened.”

In other words, the enemy vessel is not heading towards the sanctuary of Brest on the French Atlantic coast, but rather back to where the Home Fleet battleships are closing. Bismarck’s change in direction cannot be happening by choice.

“They ultimately accepted that there were two hits … we had attacked after the torpedo had hit the rudder. We were the last aircraft to attack the Bismarck, then or any other day.”

Thanks to their sheer guts and the peculiarly tough characteristics of their aircraft, the Royal Navy’s young aviators brought the German behemoth to heel. On the morning of May 27, the battleships and cruisers of the Home Fleet finished the job and destroyed Bismarck.

Therein lies a lesson for today, when big ships on the so-called cutting edge of war-fighting technology once again, apparently, rule supreme. Even the mightiest craft can be vanquished by pluck and a few lucky shots by people operating allegedly antiquated equipment or finding asymmetric means of attack.

Cmdr. Terry Goddard enjoyed a long and distinguished career as a naval aviator, seeing further action in the Second World War and playing a key role in post-war Royal Canadian Navy maritime aviation. He passed away in March 2016 at the age of 94.


https://warisboring.com/in-1941-roy...most-powerful-warship-5631f9f3de68#.jg7z0bevh
 
Video: Venäläishävittäjän kyydissä stratosfääriin - 50 minuutin matka maksaa 18 500 euroa

http://www.iltasanomat.fi/matkat/art-2000001233813.html

Ei painepukua. Mitä tapahtuu noissa korkeuksissa jouduttaessa hyppäämään ilman pukua? Veikkaan, ettei mitään mukavaa.

Ilmailulääketiede tuntee ns. "Armstrongin rajan."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armstrong_limit

Yleisen määritelmän mukaan raja saavutetaan 60 000 jalan (18km) korkeudessa.

At or above the Armstrong limit, exposed bodily liquids such as saliva, tears, urine, blood and the liquids wetting the alveoli within the lungs—but not vascular blood (blood within the circulatory system)—will boil away without a pressure suit, and no amount of breathable oxygen delivered by any means will sustain life for more than a few minutes. The NASA technical report Rapid (Explosive) Decompression Emergencies in Pressure-Suited Subjects, which discusses the brief accidental exposure of a human to near vacuum, notes the likely result of exposure to pressure below that associated with the Armstrong limit: "The subject later reported that ... his last conscious memory was of the water on his tongue beginning to boil."

Ohjaamon paineistuksen menetys tai heittoistuinhyppy tuossa korkeudessa on todella kakkamainen juttu.

Myytinmurtajat havainnollistavat ilmiön painekammiossa.

 
Ilmavalvonnasta kiinnostuneille vinkki.

http://www.fht.nu/fv_film.html

Tuolta pystyy lataamaan maksutta kotikoneelle filmin Radar dots in the dark during the cold war. Kyseessä on englanninkielinen katsaus ruotsalaisten kylmän sodan aikaisista tutkavalvontamateriaaleista. Kuvaa hyvin sitä jatkuvaa kissa ja hiirileikkiä mitä NATO-maat ja Neuvostoliitto kävivät Itämerellä. Tutkan kuvaputkella vipeltävät valopisteet olivat ainakin minusta mielenkiintoista seurattavaa.
 
@tulikomento erinomainen video! Löytyy tosin jo aika moneen kertaan ja aika monesta ketjusta. Itse olen tuon varmaan ekan kerran linkittäny. On youtubessakin jos ei halua ladata
 
@tulikomento erinomainen video! Löytyy tosin jo aika moneen kertaan ja aika monesta ketjusta. Itse olen tuon varmaan ekan kerran linkittäny. On youtubessakin jos ei halua ladata

Joo. Muistanpa itsekin linkittäneeni youtube-version. Mutta laitoin silti kun ajattelin että joku muukin saattaisi haluta ladata tuon kotikoneelleen. Tosi mielenkiintoista matskua. Mukana on useita eri konetyyppejä (mm. RC-135, SR-71 ym.) molemmilta puolilta rautaesirippua. Ja jossain pätkissä näytetään vielä mitenkä neukut käyttivät häirintää peittääkseen omia ilmasotaharjoituksiaan ruotsalaisten tutkilta. Ja kyllähän Ruotsi itsekin osallistui leikkiin. Yksi filmipätkä kuvaa Flygvapnetin SH-37 Viggenien meritiedustelukeikkaa jossain Riianlahden tasalla. Saivat neukkuhäätäjät peräänsä.
 
Viimeksi muokattu:
Pari videota:

USAF:n eversti evp. tarinoi mm. amerikkalaisten varhaisimmilla suihkuhävittäjätyypeillä lentämisellä (mm. F-80, F-94). Tämän jälkeen lensi torjuntahävittäjillä (F-102, F-106, F-101). Lisäksi on tarinaa F-4 Phantomilla lentämisestä Vietnamissa.


Navyn kommodori evp. puolestaan kertoo kokemuksistaan F-9 Pantherilla. Pääosa videosta keskittyy Vietnamiin, jossa kaveri lensi A-4 Skyhawkia ja A-7 Corsairia.


EDIT: Tämä kaveri on lentänyt jokseenkin kaikilla Navyn hävittäjillä. Aloitti 50-luvun alussa WW2 -kalustolla (mm. F6 Hellcat) ja lopetteli uransa lentämällä Hornetia.

 
Viimeksi muokattu:
Entinen ruotsalainen taistelulentäjä muistelee.


Liittyi ilmavoimiin 60-luvun alussa. Alkeiskoulukoneena Saab Safir, suihkuharjoituskoneena Vampire Trainer. Lensi sitten ilmeisesti Drakenia Luulajassa. Kertoo tuossa mm. miten hälytettiin tunnistuslennolle. Suomen rajan yli tunkeutui Varsovan liittoon kuuluneen maan sotilaskone. Mitenkähän on, olisiko muistelija muistellut nyt väärin ? Olisko voinut olla esim. vahingossa Ruotsin puolelle eksynyt suomalainen MiG-21 F ? Kuulostaa aika uskomattomalta, että vielä tuossa vaiheessa meikäläiset olisivat ilman vastatoimia päästäneet Suomen ilmatilan läpi Ruotsiin vieraan vallan sotilaskoneen (tod.näk. NL).

Haastattelun lopussa kaveri antaa murskakritiikkiä Ruotsin nykyisestä ilmapuolustuskyvystä venäläisiä vastaan.
 
Back
Top