Trump -psykoosi
- Viestiketjun aloittaja ak.tied
- Aloitus PVM
Rice knows his Joe, tooUncle bens ricenäinä rauhallisina rotestiaikoina
Panssari Salama
Respected Leader
Trump-psykoosia tämäkin, koska Trump tätä ajaa takaa. Joukkojen poistoa Saksasta, siis. US Armyn entinen Euroopan komentaja ei innostu asiasta. Ei vaikka katsoisi vain USA:n etua: Saksa erinomainen logistinen keskus, jossa ajantasainen infra. Kaikki tämä pitäisi korvata muulla.
Usein meillä keskustelussa unohtuu sekin, että jenkit eivät pelkästään ole Euroopassa hyvää hyvyyttään, vaan nämä eteentyönnetyt tukikohdat antavat heidän ihan omillekin operaatioille hyvän perustan, mistä Hertling niin ikään muistuttaa.
Usein meillä keskustelussa unohtuu sekin, että jenkit eivät pelkästään ole Euroopassa hyvää hyvyyttään, vaan nämä eteentyönnetyt tukikohdat antavat heidän ihan omillekin operaatioille hyvän perustan, mistä Hertling niin ikään muistuttaa.
Isä ja poika Trumpin suosituksella, Dr. Faucille ja muille Washingtonin huijareille terveiset:
Käärmeöljyä, voodoota, mitä muuta vielä saadaan tämän pandemian aikana? "...Cuomos brother, the crazy one..."
Käärmeöljyä, voodoota, mitä muuta vielä saadaan tämän pandemian aikana? "...Cuomos brother, the crazy one..."
Viimeksi muokattu:
ILoveEU
Kenraali
Kannattaa ottaa myös huomioon, että Trump voi olla myös tekosyy, että EU (Saksa/Ranska) hakee lähempää liittoa Kiinan ja Venäjän kanssa.
USA:n kansalaiset eivät lämmenneet globalisaation nimellä kulkeneeseen ideologiaan edes ennen Trumppia, eikä mielipidemittausten perusteella edes Trumpin jälkeen. Näin ollen, taloudellisessa mielessä Yhdysvallat on EU:n vastustaja. Kiina ja Venäjä toki haluavat lähempää suhdetta EU:n kanssa, että pääsevät ryöstämään Euroopan varallisuutta halvalla. EU:n nykyisiä johtajille se on aivan sama vaikka toteutuisi, kun oma tulevaisuus on turvattu.
Kovasti nyt haukutaan, kuinka Trumpetti ajaa EU:n Kiinan ja Venäjän kaveriksi, mutta ei kannata yllättyä, jos (kun) se toteutuu ilman erityisiä vastalauseita. Tämän prosessin vastustajia haukutaan ties millä nimillä, tottakai, oli kyseessä Puola tai EU:n kansalainen.
Cracks in the Trump-Europe relationship are turning into a chasm | CNN
For more than 70 years, the transatlantic alliance has served as the unshakable foundation of European stability and underpinned the values of the US-led Western order. In 2020, it appears that relationship is being rethought on both sides of the Atlantic.
Viimeksi muokattu:
Bolton olisi lähettänyt vähintään pommikoneet, että pata kattilaa soimaa.
"Portlandin mellakoita käytiin provosoimassa"
Pitäisi antaa ihan vapaasti riehua ja rikkoa paikkoja?
Entäs jos riehujat olisi politiikan toisesta päästä, niin pitäisikö niidenkin antaa riehua kuinka huvittaa ja rikkoa muistomerkkejä jotka ei heitä innosta?
Riehujia ja paikkojen sotkijoita (Trumpin luokittelemia anarkisteja?) lienee ollut se sama osuus on kuin missä tahansa läntisessä mielenosoituksessa. Fed ei ole osallistunut paikkojen siivoiluun Portlandissa, vaan siellä siivoaa ja poistaa töherryksiä mm. Wall of Moms, veteraanit, yms. rauhallisemmat protestoijat. Toimittajat ovat etsineet anarkisteja mellakoista huonoin tuloksin.
Opinion
Help Me Find Trump’s ‘Anarchists’ in Portland
The president has his politically driven narrative. And then there’s reality.
By Nicholas Kristof
Opinion Columnist
PORTLAND, Ore. — I’ve been on the front lines of the protests here, searching for the “radical-left anarchists” who President Trump says are on Portland streets each evening.
I thought I’d found one: a man who for weeks leapt into the fray and has been shot four times with impact munitions yet keeps coming back. I figured he must be a crazed anarchist.
But no, he turned out to be Dr. Bryan Wolf, a radiologist who wears his white doctor’s jacket and carries a sign with a red cross and the words “humanitarian aid.” He pleads with federal forces not to shoot or gas protesters.
“Put your gun barrels down!” he cries out. “Why are you loading your grenade launchers? We’re just standing ——”
And then they shoot.
Dr. Wolf, an assistant professor at Oregon Health Sciences University, helps at a medic stand operated by volunteers from the medical school. Could they be radical-left anarchists? No, they’ve imposed order on the anarchy of the street by establishing qualifications for field medics and a hierarchy among them, so that any badly injured protester will immediately get the right kind of care.
Accomplishing all this while tear gas is swirling and impact munitions are whizzing by, without even asking for insurance cards — that seems the opposite of what fanatical anarchists might do.
Maybe the rioting anarchists were in front of the crowd, where there are discussions about Black Lives Matter? I found musicians and activists and technicians, who were projecting a huge sign on the wall of a nearby building — “Fed Goons Out of PDX” — that seemed a bit geeky for anarchists.
Oh, wait, there was a man using angry language about the federal “occupation” and calling it “abhorrent.” Lots of protesters don’t seem to like him, so could he be a crazed anarchist rioter?
Oops, no, that’s just Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler, sputtering after being tear-gassed by the feds.
Then I heard someone calling for the overthrow of Portland’s “leadership,” and I’d figured I’d finally found an anarchist. But it turned out to be Maria Bartiromo of Fox News, asking Chad Wolf, the acting head of homeland security, “Why can’t you just arrest the leadership in Portland because of their ignoring what’s really happening on the ground?”
She may be a crazed anarchist trying to topple legitimate authority, but I doubt she’s the kind Trump meant.
OK, I’ll fess up: Sure there are anarchists and antifa activists in the Portland protests, just as there are radiologists and electricians, lawyers and mechanics. Report on the ground here and any single narrative feels too simplistic. The protesters aren’t all peaceful, nor are they primarily violent. They’re a complicated weave, differing by time of day.
In the evening, the throngs are entirely peaceful, listening to speeches about Black Lives Matter, and the authorities do not intervene. Then, as if following a script, about 11 p.m. some protesters begin to shoot fireworks or set small trash fires. (No, they’re not trying to burn down the federal courthouse, as Wolf suggests.)
Some of these late-night protesters try to provoke the federal forces, partly to show how federal agents overreact with indiscriminate force. Meanwhile, Trump is deploying federal forces to provoke protesters into using violence that he can campaign on.
Provocateurs are found in both the streets and the White House.
We see dueling narratives. One is Trump’s, and it portrays Portland and other cities with protests against police brutality as teetering on the abyss and requiring his Lincolnesque hand to hold America together. The other is — well, shall we call it reality? Yes, there’s violence and vandalism, as well as opportunistic looting, and it’ll be a challenge to manage it, but local officials are much better placed to do so than the White House.
Oregon and Trump administration officials on Wednesday announced an agreement to reduce tensions around the federal courthouse. But the timing and extent of the withdrawal of federal forces was unclear.
I’m against all violent attacks on officers, and I worry that Trump’s provocations are succeeding in seeding violence — as we’ve already seen in Seattle, Oakland and elsewhere. Every time angry progressives burn a building down, they win votes for Trump.
That’s what this is about: politics. The big threat in Portland and across America is not anarchists but Covid-19, so Trump welcomes street clashes to change the subject. If he actually cared about the defacement of the federal courthouse in Portland, he would remove the graffiti; instead, he leaves it there for photo ops. It’s the protesters, not the federal authorities, who deploy teams each night in
Portland to clean up the area around the courthouse.
It also must be said that while there’s violence from both sides, what I’ve seen firsthand is that the most violent behavior overwhelmingly comes from the federal agents, and indeed the most serious injuries have been suffered by protesters. Your federal tax dollars paid to shoot a man in the face with a “less lethal” munition — an unprovoked assault that left him with a fractured skull and possible brain damage.
If you want to call one side “rioters” or “anarchists” working to create tumult in Portland, it’s the uninvited feds who qualify.
www.nytimes.com
Help Me Find Trump’s ‘Anarchists’ in Portland
The president has his politically driven narrative. And then there’s reality.
By Nicholas Kristof
Opinion Columnist
PORTLAND, Ore. — I’ve been on the front lines of the protests here, searching for the “radical-left anarchists” who President Trump says are on Portland streets each evening.
I thought I’d found one: a man who for weeks leapt into the fray and has been shot four times with impact munitions yet keeps coming back. I figured he must be a crazed anarchist.
But no, he turned out to be Dr. Bryan Wolf, a radiologist who wears his white doctor’s jacket and carries a sign with a red cross and the words “humanitarian aid.” He pleads with federal forces not to shoot or gas protesters.
“Put your gun barrels down!” he cries out. “Why are you loading your grenade launchers? We’re just standing ——”
And then they shoot.
Dr. Wolf, an assistant professor at Oregon Health Sciences University, helps at a medic stand operated by volunteers from the medical school. Could they be radical-left anarchists? No, they’ve imposed order on the anarchy of the street by establishing qualifications for field medics and a hierarchy among them, so that any badly injured protester will immediately get the right kind of care.
Accomplishing all this while tear gas is swirling and impact munitions are whizzing by, without even asking for insurance cards — that seems the opposite of what fanatical anarchists might do.
Maybe the rioting anarchists were in front of the crowd, where there are discussions about Black Lives Matter? I found musicians and activists and technicians, who were projecting a huge sign on the wall of a nearby building — “Fed Goons Out of PDX” — that seemed a bit geeky for anarchists.
Oh, wait, there was a man using angry language about the federal “occupation” and calling it “abhorrent.” Lots of protesters don’t seem to like him, so could he be a crazed anarchist rioter?
Oops, no, that’s just Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler, sputtering after being tear-gassed by the feds.
Then I heard someone calling for the overthrow of Portland’s “leadership,” and I’d figured I’d finally found an anarchist. But it turned out to be Maria Bartiromo of Fox News, asking Chad Wolf, the acting head of homeland security, “Why can’t you just arrest the leadership in Portland because of their ignoring what’s really happening on the ground?”
She may be a crazed anarchist trying to topple legitimate authority, but I doubt she’s the kind Trump meant.
OK, I’ll fess up: Sure there are anarchists and antifa activists in the Portland protests, just as there are radiologists and electricians, lawyers and mechanics. Report on the ground here and any single narrative feels too simplistic. The protesters aren’t all peaceful, nor are they primarily violent. They’re a complicated weave, differing by time of day.
In the evening, the throngs are entirely peaceful, listening to speeches about Black Lives Matter, and the authorities do not intervene. Then, as if following a script, about 11 p.m. some protesters begin to shoot fireworks or set small trash fires. (No, they’re not trying to burn down the federal courthouse, as Wolf suggests.)
Some of these late-night protesters try to provoke the federal forces, partly to show how federal agents overreact with indiscriminate force. Meanwhile, Trump is deploying federal forces to provoke protesters into using violence that he can campaign on.
Provocateurs are found in both the streets and the White House.
We see dueling narratives. One is Trump’s, and it portrays Portland and other cities with protests against police brutality as teetering on the abyss and requiring his Lincolnesque hand to hold America together. The other is — well, shall we call it reality? Yes, there’s violence and vandalism, as well as opportunistic looting, and it’ll be a challenge to manage it, but local officials are much better placed to do so than the White House.
Oregon and Trump administration officials on Wednesday announced an agreement to reduce tensions around the federal courthouse. But the timing and extent of the withdrawal of federal forces was unclear.
I’m against all violent attacks on officers, and I worry that Trump’s provocations are succeeding in seeding violence — as we’ve already seen in Seattle, Oakland and elsewhere. Every time angry progressives burn a building down, they win votes for Trump.
That’s what this is about: politics. The big threat in Portland and across America is not anarchists but Covid-19, so Trump welcomes street clashes to change the subject. If he actually cared about the defacement of the federal courthouse in Portland, he would remove the graffiti; instead, he leaves it there for photo ops. It’s the protesters, not the federal authorities, who deploy teams each night in
Portland to clean up the area around the courthouse.
It also must be said that while there’s violence from both sides, what I’ve seen firsthand is that the most violent behavior overwhelmingly comes from the federal agents, and indeed the most serious injuries have been suffered by protesters. Your federal tax dollars paid to shoot a man in the face with a “less lethal” munition — an unprovoked assault that left him with a fractured skull and possible brain damage.
If you want to call one side “rioters” or “anarchists” working to create tumult in Portland, it’s the uninvited feds who qualify.
Opinion | Help Me Find Trump’s ‘Anarchists’ in Portland (Published 2020)
The president has his politically driven narrative. And then there’s reality.
Viimeksi muokattu:
Trump haluaa lykätä vaaleja.
www.bbc.com
Donald Trump suggests delay to 2020 US presidential election
The US president cites concern over mail-in voting, despite little evidence of widespread fraud.
www.bbc.com
Panssari Salama
Respected Leader
Saa nähdä meneekö media taas Trumpin lankaan, ja unohtaa tätä järkytystä raportoidessaan kertoa umpisurkeat julkistetut talousraportit: 1.4 miljoonaa uutta työtöntä, kansantalous sakkaa todella(!) rankasti Q2:lla, ...Trump haluaa lykätä vaaleja.
Donald Trump suggests delay to 2020 US presidential election
The US president cites concern over mail-in voting, despite little evidence of widespread fraud.
Trump on kyllä mestari hallitsemaan uutisnarratiivia twiiteillään.
Big Tech Earnings Surge as Economy Slumps (Published 2020)
The latest on stock market and business news during the coronavirus outbreak.
"The economy, stupid" is a phrase coined by James Carville in 1992. It is often quoted from a televised quip by Carville as "It’s the economy, stupid." Carville was a strategist in Bill Clinton's successful 1992 presidential campaign against incumbent George H. W. Bush. His phrase was directed at the campaign's workers and intended as one of three messages for them to focus on.
It's the economy, stupid - Wikipedia
Viimeksi muokattu:
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Tuossa jonkinlaista koontaa asiasta. Sisältää monia mielenkiintoisia linkkejä:
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/th...HsFCqaDspW12xw_eoSGNAVgTFoaFGX4-ze1rxd6S6ebY8
The Hydroxychloroquine Scandal
FDA, sikäläinen Trumpin virkamiesten hallinnoima lääke(yms.)virasto, perui kesäkuussa hydroksiklorokiinin käyttöluvan sairaaloiden teho-osastoilla, sen tehoamattomuuden Covid-virukseen ja mahdollisten vaarallisten sivuvaikutusten vuoksi.
The Food and Drug Administration revoked emergency-use authorization for two malaria drugs touted by President Donald Trump as Covid-19 treatments after determining they were unlikely to work against the virus and could have dangerous side effects.
The agency also warned that the medications could interfere with the only drug that has been specifically approved for treatment of the virus.
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine “are unlikely to be effective in treating Covid-19,” the Food and Drug Administration said Monday. “In light of ongoing serious cardiac adverse events and other serious side effects, the known and potential benefits of CQ and HCQ no longer outweigh the known and potential risks for the authorized use.”
The decision is the latest twist in a saga that has created confusion in the race to find therapies for Covid-19. The use of hydroxychloroquine to treat coronavirus patients was embraced early on by hospitals, and a rush to secure supplies led to shortages, but use has dwindled as other treatments gained favor. Trump’s enthusiasm for the medicines also made them a political lightning rod.
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
www.bloomberg.com
Coronavirus in the U.S.: Latest Map and Case Count
A detailed county map shows the extent of the coronavirus outbreak, with tables of the number of cases by county.
www.nytimes.com