https://t.me/fighter_bomber/11648
Fighterbomber
What's up with Laos aviation?
Fundamentally, the tactics of application have not changed. The only thing, judging by the complete disappearance of the beautiful vidos of obscuring and obscuring targets, we can say that a ban has been imposed on this method of combat use.
It is most likely connected with the fact that we can build 1600 tanks in a year, but assembling a hundred aircraft / helicopters is no longer a fact, although the same Ka-52Ms are already fighting with might and main.
They figured out about the cabling as well - again, only the Ka-52 and a bit of the Mi-28 work effectively from the nose-up with NARs, because they have a special mode of operation of the computer system for this business.
The effectiveness of the rest directly depends on the experience of the crew and the choice of target.
For example, if you hit the opornik in a forest belt across, then you can hit the target only by chance, if along, then there is a chance. But with such microscopic charges in one or two NAR units, shooting in a completely manual mode, when the pilot calculates and maintains all the shooting parameters manually, the effectiveness of this method is almost none.
That helicopters, that planes.
"Disturbing shooting", so to speak, at the exit.
Therefore, the main work is now being carried out by the UMPC, the geography of which is steadily expanding. Of course, it is not enough. But work in this direction is the most active.
For aviation to work
how it is necessary along bridges, rear areas, reserves, industrial facilities, and so on, and at the same time not to lose all of it in a couple of days, you need to do everything the same that they could not do for the entire period of the NWO.
Open the textbook of tactics of the USSR and do as it is written there. And it is written there that for aviation to work, everything that is in the Armed Forces needs to cut through passage corridors in which enemy air defense will be destroyed with ... probability.
Since at this stage we do not know exactly where the enemy's air defense is located at the time of such a cut, we cannot cut through.
We don’t know, because people’s mavics cannot fly 30 km beyond the front, and intelligence information from what they can see rots in the time that this information gets to the means of destruction.
Yes, and there is no point in cutting through some corridors if ground forces do not rush into these corridors behind aircraft.
I repeat once again, neither we nor the crests have used and are not using any new secret tactics and technologies. These are all hundred-year-old tactics, written in ancient textbooks that few people read.
Well, yes, you can still throw all the aircraft on some opornik near Bakhmut. And Bakhmut will be taken tomorrow. Only the day after tomorrow there will be no more aviation in Laos.
Well, about the effectiveness of aviation musicians against the effectiveness of aviation in Laos.
It is very funny for me to read young and young experts who believe that Wagner aviation works more efficiently than the Aerospace Forces, and therefore everyone urgently needs the same, and everyone immediately under their leadership.
Yes. Aircraft musicians work effectively.
But not for long.
t.me/fighter_bomber/11648
145.0K views edited
Mar 27 at 10:35
www.newcivilengineer.com
yle.fi
