Tässä tuore näkemys sisältä päin.
https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venäjän_kansallinen_yhtenäisyys liikkeen venäjänkieliseltä sivulta. Google-käännös ja linkki on tarkoituksella katkaistu.
http://www.rusnation .org/sfk/1708/1708-12.shtml
While the official media tell tales about the imaginary successes of the domestic economy and report on the bright prospects of the country, Putin's Russia is turning into a cross between Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. Almost a quarter of the Russian regions for economic development and the quality of life of the population are approximately at the same level as Sudan, Pakistan, Nigeria, Libya and Bhutan. Such is the dry statistics. Almost all these regions can be called "zones of national disaster," experts believe. Because an unfavorable economic situation always entails a whole range of problems - from the growth of crime to outflow of the population.
Approximately every fourth subject of the Russian Federation is comparable in its economic position to the developing countries of Africa, Latin America, Asia or, at best, Southeast Europe. From Rosstat's data it follows that in the Russian Federation there are more than 20 regions counted, in which the gross regional product per capita ranges from 4.3 to 10.6 thousand international dollars. Among them are Bryansk, Ivanovo, Kirov, Kurgan regions, Altai republics, Mordovia, Buryatia, Stavropol and Zabaikalye territories and other subjects. As a result, all of them in the level of economic development and quality of life of the population were in the same category as Sudan, Pakistan, Honduras, Nigeria, Guatemala and Libya.
Relatively high rates in Russia are only in Moscow and oil and gas producing regions. Accordingly, the regions that have become a "national disaster zone" have problems on a number of parameters: the incidence rate, crime rate, life expectancy, and investment. At the same time, not necessarily good indicators directly testify to the high quality of life in this or that region of the Russian Federation. After all, for example, revenues from extracting regions are exported to the federal center - Moscow. At the same time, the Finance Ministry makes it clear that the regions should not count on the concessions of the federal center. Judging by the "Main directions of the debt policy" for the next three-year period, the Ministry of Finance will try to dump the ballast from the budget in the form of the debt load of the regions, offering them to issue bonds.
The result of this situation is a steady increase in the outflow of capital from the Russian Federation and an increase in the number of emigrants. According to official data of the Central Bank, the net capital outflow in January-July increased 1.5 times - to 13.1 billion dollars against 8.8 billion dollars for the same period last year. Only in the past year, Russia left 2,000 dollar millionaires and billionaires, along with their emigrated and their assets.
Opinion polls show that since the beginning of the year a significant number of citizens of the Russian Federation, thinking about moving, transferred their desire from an abstract dream to the intended goal. Against the backdrop of the Kremlin struggle against any real political activity, the rapid fall in incomes and the growing social stratification, an increasing number of people are thinking about moving to "some other country". Experts predict that Russia will soon be covered by a new wave of emigration, "the largest in the last 20 years." The main problem is that today's emigrants are mostly highly qualified cadres who do not see prospects for themselves in Putin's "sovereign multinationals." According to experts, half of the Russian youth is morally ready to go abroad. According to preliminary estimates, material damage from emigration can be up to $ 1.5 trillion a year.
"The Kremlin" actually turned the whole country into a "national disaster zone". According to the most optimistic official forecasts, the Russian Federation will need at least 10 years to compensate for the three-year drop in revenues and return at least to the level of 2014. In reality, economists believe, one should speak about the future, at least, 20-year stagnation of the economy. All this contrasts sharply with the constantly broadcast on TV promises of the impending economic breakthrough. However, the most pragmatic part of the electorate does not believe in promises, either it packs suitcases, or experiences increasing irritation due to the constant deterioration in the quality of life.