Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry nyt vaan, mutta täältä on bännattu porukkaa, joten jos jonkinlaista altteria ja trollia on mahdollisesti liikkeellä ...saatana. Mitä touhua, se että ystävällisesti ilmottauduin että voin vastata joihinkin kysymyksiin. En käsittääkseni tarkoittanut pahalla
The biggest problem here is the medicine is the fact that the initial stage of the war here is not many people even knew nothing about the medication . nothing. at the moment the situation is better but the medical equipment was needed more , much more . here the a hospital can take your life . they are sometimes terrible . if somebody come here please take your own first-aid equipment according to . including needles , etc. basic supplies
Most of the injuries is made by artillery .
Hi CL!.... Except mines, accidents and stuff like that, .
saatana. Mitä touhua, se että ystävällisesti ilmottauduin että voin vastata joihinkin kysymyksiin. En käsittääkseni tarkoittanut pahalla.
Ota mielellään lisää kuvia ulkona.Tänään olen kievossa. otanko huomenna sanomalehdestä kuvan ja kirjoitan maanpuolustus.net
Vai haluatko junalipusta kuvan mikä on tältäpäivältä millä tänne tulin.
Tuossa on kuva vanhasta lentolipusta ja paikallillisesta rahasta.
Yea, artillery is as always the big killer (or incapacitater). Except mines, accidents and stuff like that, I think during our actual battles we only had a few casualties from small arms fire, and I only saw one up close. Just about everything was caused by the big guns..
Hi CL!
Just one small question about that "stuff". How common is use of IED`s there, in and between battlezones? Seen any of those?
It depends on what you would call IED. Is the term only reserved for your typical taliban daisy-chained 155mm artilleryrounds, or also simply when you convert a handgrenade into an AP-mine as well? If the latter, lets just say that the smaller they get - the more common they become. Peoples imagination really peaks during wartime.
But in short, IED are probably not as common as in Afghanistan and places like that, but they do exist in different forms and shapes.
Imrovised Explosive Device. AFAIK there is no size limitation for the term. Were IED:s used much in the Anti-Tank role? Like for a example one can have an AT-mine attached with explosive cord to a larger charge in the estimated direction of approach.It depends on what you would call IED. Is the term only reserved for your typical taliban daisy-chained 155mm artilleryrounds, or also simply when you convert a handgrenade into an AP-mine as well? If the latter, lets just say that the smaller they get - the more common they become. Peoples imagination really peaks during wartime.
But in short, IED are probably not as common as in Afghanistan and places like that, but they do exist in different forms and shapes.
But anyway: It sounds like those IEDs are spontaneously made by the frontline troops with whatever they have at hand?
Imrovised Explosive Device. AFAIK there is no size limitation for the term. Were IED:s used much in the Anti-Tank role? Like for a example one can have an AT-mine attached with explosive cord to a larger charge in the estimated direction of approach.
Also how did the enemy breach holes into minefields? Rocket bangalores followed by tanks with dozer blades?
In my experience yes. Heres a pair of.. well, I guess you could them IEDs? At least they are spontaneously made..
Katso liite: 4233 Katso liite: 4234
Hand grenade firing mechanism attached to something that looks like a 30mm grenade, right?
I can't tell what that other one is. That could pass as a real purpose made munition to me.
But yeah. Those do count as IEDs for sure. I take that you guys aren't making any maps about mine fields considering the level of secrecy going on around there? This is not good ofcource but understandable under the circumstances.
Hey Sinkomies. You wrote F1, do you mean F1 Limonka, that old 1940-style handgrenade?...than your average F1...
One thing striking me as funny is how most of us Finns commenting in this thread base their questions on the sometimes even quite high level of sophistication in tactics and professinalism instilled in them in training and stretch to assumptions about the skills present on both sides of the conflict, especially on the Russian side. When one gets better acquainted with the day-to-day running of the Russian Machine, the first thing to fade away are the expectations about trained professionals! Slavic mentality is alive and well and most often than not the Russians tend to do something without giving it much real, analytic thought. This is not to say that one should not respect the Russians as adversaries, but rather to stop thinking of them as something higher than oneself in military terms.