Mjoo. Kelasin lävitse.
Itse olen vähän pettynyt esitykseen. Viljeltiin termejä, kuten "inside counts, courage, trailblaser" jne.
Olivat ihan fiksusti nostaneet avioniikka-arkitehtuurin ja uuden model-based-design-manufacture-sustain toimintatavan esille. Mutta nimenomaan juuri ne olivat pelkkää ylätason huttua.
Tässä
parempaa selitystä asioista.
1. Avioniikka
Kieltämättä, ei ihan yhtä vetävän näköinen blondi nais-insinööri - mutta kertoo paljon kiinnostavammin. (kohdasta 23 min).
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/61477219?lang=en_US
Tiivistelmä edellisestä esityksestä tekstimuodossa.
http://highscalability.com/blog/201...ter-complex-systems-containers-microserv.html
2. Model based design
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/saab-reveals-full-gripen-e-design-cost-savings-396977/
Lars Ydreskog, Saab’s head of aerospace operations, says the company’s use of a model-based design technique based around Dassault Systemes’ CATIA software is generating huge benefits for the E project. “You can show the operator how they will do something in 2023, before you’ve done anything in the development,” he notes. Combined with a reduced parts count – for example, a single machined part is now used to construct the radar frame, versus more than 20 on the C – and reduced lead times, the new version will be cheaper to produce. Compared against 2009 prices, “it’s going to be a 50% productivity increase”, Ydreskog says. The E-model demonstrator activity using aircraft 39-7 has also been performed for just 40% of its initial projected cost, he adds.
Saab has also driven increased efficiency through its experience in the Gripen’s conversion from the A/B to C/D standards, as well as through manufacturing parts for Airbus and Boeing commercial products, and design and production work for the Dassault-led Neuron unmanned combat air system technology demonstrator. The company’s aeronautics unit now has around 3,000 engineers, 800 of which were recruited in the last two to three years.
“We’re pushing the performance more than we’ve ever done, and pushing the costs down,” says Sindahl, while Ydreskog comments: “We are never satisfied – we are always challenging ourselves.” This experience is also now being drawn on by Saab with Boeing, with the companies working together in pursuit of the US Air Force’s potentially 350-aircraft T-X jet trainer requirement.
The increased use of design- and flight test-modelling for the Gripen E also means that while almost 4,000 sorties were required to prepare the C/D model, the three new test platforms should fly only a combined 1,200 times.
http://www.gripenblogs.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=1316
What makes the Gripen NG development unique and cost effective is a combination of a model based design and reduced parts count. Both ensure that the Gripen E development is on time and in sync with the latest technologically advanced processes.
The model based development ensures that design errors are detected early and not late in the development process. The system allows verifications to be conducted in simulators and as a result, fewer test flights are needed. So, while almost 4,000 sorties were required to prepare the C/D model, the new test platforms should fly only a combined 1,200 times.
According to Lars Ydreskog, Saab’s head of aerospace operations, a model-based design technique is generating huge benefits for the Gripen E project.
“You can show the operator how they will do something in 2023, before you’ve done anything in the development,” he notes.
At the Dubai Air Show 2015, Head of Saab’s aeronautics business area Ulf Nilsson said that Saab has dramatically reduced the number of parts in Gripen development through modular design.
For example, for Gripen NG, currently one machine part is being used to manufacture a radar frame, but the number of machine parts was more than 20 for the same in Gripen C. This not only delivers cost efficiency, but also means that every new aircraft will be less complex and quicker to put together.
---
Sitä ei mainittu, että tässä hyödynnetään pohjalla Dassaultin kehittämää Catia-ohjelmistoa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CATIA
Tipahtamista voisi nimittäin joutua odottamaan aika pitkään. Jostain syystä sinulta oli jäänyt loppu lainauksesta pois.
) Jos "lähialueet" taas on russofobinen viittaus Venäjään, niin silloinkin voi käydä kuten meidän Hornetille: kyllähän se oli laadullisesti ylivoimainen silloin 1990-luvulla, mutta ei enää tänä päivänä.