Ilmavoimien tulevaisuus

Sveitsin osalta F-35 tuskin etenee RFI:tä pidemmälle, ellei Sveitsi luovu nykyisestä puolueettomuus-politiikasta ja itsenäisestä puolustuksesta(ALIS+raskashuolto ulkomailla). Lisäksi voi olettaa, että Sveitsi haluaa suorittaa tälläkin kertaa testilentoja, mikä on myös show-stopper.
 
http://www.janes.com/article/75502/...aircraft-as-part-of-wider-modernisation-plans

"The official noted that Malaysia’s traditional approach of acquiring large twin-seat and twin-engined aircraft because of its large maritime areas is now just too expensive given the downturn in the economy caused by the drop in the international oil price. “We cannot now do this because of our economic situation and so must now find something that is cheaper to buy and operate.” As well as being an air defender and ground-attack aircraft, the LCA should also serve as a lead-in fighter trainer (LIFT) platform and should be ready for fielding in about 2021/22."

///

http://www.janes.com/article/75511/germany-declared-preference-for-f-35-to-replace-tornado

“The German Ministry of Defence [MoD] is looking at several aircraft today, including the F-35 – it is commercially available already, has been ordered by many nations and is being introduced into service today, and has most of the capabilities required.”

Meinaakohan Saksa skipata hankintakilpailun kokonaan aikapulaan vedoten, ennakkosuosikin julistaminen vähän viittaisi siihen suuntaan.
Siivet-lehdessä oli juuri juttu Italian F-35 tehtaasta jossa pyörät pyörii vajaatehoilla ja porukkaa ei ole tarpeeksi kun Alankomaat taisi supistaa omaa tilaustaan. Johan tulisi Camerin kokoonpanolinjalle vauhtia jos Sakemannit hankkisivat heti 50 kpl koneita...
 
The jets would then be delivered in 2025 and the fleet ready for action in 2030."
Paitsi, etta k-aanestys taytyy ujuttaa valiin, niin muutenhan tuo menee HX:n kanssa yksiin? VRT.
Sveitsi on näillä näkymin siis paukauttamassa valintapäätöksen juuri ennen Suomea.

voi olettaa, että Sveitsi haluaa suorittaa tälläkin kertaa testilentoja, mikä on myös show-stopper.
- eiko Suomi(kin)?

Alankomaat taisi supistaa omaa tilaustaan
Onhan testaasta paattamisen jalkeen Italian omakin tilaus "karsinyt karsintaa".
 
Viimeisen julkisen tiedon valossa, Suomi aikoo suorittaa jotain vapaaehtoisia talvitestejä, joka tarkoittaa lähinnä koneen käsittelyä ja huoltoa maan pinnalla. Sveitsi taas kaiken järjen mukaan toteuttaa jokseenkin saman testisarjan kuin viimeksi.
 
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...g-21-fighter-planes-ajit-doval/1/1086425.html

"The IAF said the Tejas is far behind its competitors like the JAS 39 Gripen manufactured by the Swedish aerospace company Saab and the US made F-16 manufactured by Lockheed Martin, sources said."

"India is desperate for single-engine fighters to replace aging MiG-21s. The country needs at least 42 fighter squadrons to fight a two front war, but currently has only 33 squadrons. And, at least another 11 fighter squadrons of the IAF will have to be retired in the next two years."
 
Yltä eroista. @Huhta ihmetteli joskus asiaa. Silloin tuli jo avattua eroja, mutta tuossa vielä Intian ilmavoimien kertomana.
  • "Endurance" of Tejas in combat is just about 59 minutes as against 3 hours of Gripen and nearly 4 fours for the F-16.
  • Tejas can carry a pay-load of about three tons against nearly six tons and seven tons by the Gripen and F-16 respectively.
  • --> "In other words, for target that needs about 36 bombs to be destroyed, one will have to deploy six Tejas as against just three Gripen or F-16," the IAF has told the government.
  • The IAF has also said Tejas needs 20 hours of serving for every hour of flying as against six hours for Gripen and 3.5 hours for F-16. --> The cost of maintaining the Tejas is much higher than the other fighters.
  • Also, both the F-16 and Gripen has a life-span of 40 years against just 20 of Tejas.
  • And, in some areas the vintage Russian made Mig-21 is better than Tejas, the IAF is understood to have told the government.
Ei ihme, että Intian ilmavoimat haluaisi ostaa länsimaisen hävittäjän...
 
Yltä eroista. @Huhta ihmetteli joskus asiaa. Silloin tuli jo avattua eroja, mutta tuossa vielä Intian ilmavoimien kertomana.
  • "Endurance" of Tejas in combat is just about 59 minutes as against 3 hours of Gripen and nearly 4 fours for the F-16.
  • Tejas can carry a pay-load of about three tons against nearly six tons and seven tons by the Gripen and F-16 respectively.
  • --> "In other words, for target that needs about 36 bombs to be destroyed, one will have to deploy six Tejas as against just three Gripen or F-16," the IAF has told the government.
  • The IAF has also said Tejas needs 20 hours of serving for every hour of flying as against six hours for Gripen and 3.5 hours for F-16. --> The cost of maintaining the Tejas is much higher than the other fighters.
  • Also, both the F-16 and Gripen has a life-span of 40 years against just 20 of Tejas.
  • And, in some areas the vintage Russian made Mig-21 is better than Tejas, the IAF is understood to have told the government.
Ei ihme, että Intian ilmavoimat haluaisi ostaa länsimaisen hävittäjän...
Tämä oli aika yllättävä:
The IAF has also said Tejas needs 20 hours of serving for every hour of flying as against six hours for Gripen and 3.5 hours for F-16.
Olisi hypetys antanut olettaa asian olevan toisin päin.
 
Joo, kiinnitin myös tuohon huomiota. Tuo F-16 lukema tuntuu liian alhaiselta.

Tuossa pari linkkiä.

http://www.mirage-jet.com/AIRFRAME/MAINTE_1/mainte_1.htm

http://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1021811
Eiköhän Intian ilmavoimilla ole käsitys asiasta. Intiaan tarjottu malli on Block 70, linkeissäsi puhutaan vanhemmista malleista (A ja C Block 50). Olisi ihan loogista kehitystä jos uudempaa teknologiaa käyttävä versio vaatisi myös vähemmän huoltoa.
 
Yltä eroista. @Huhta ihmetteli joskus asiaa. Silloin tuli jo avattua eroja, mutta tuossa vielä Intian ilmavoimien kertomana.
  • "Endurance" of Tejas in combat is just about 59 minutes as against 3 hours of Gripen and nearly 4 fours for the F-16.
  • Tejas can carry a pay-load of about three tons against nearly six tons and seven tons by the Gripen and F-16 respectively.
  • --> "In other words, for target that needs about 36 bombs to be destroyed, one will have to deploy six Tejas as against just three Gripen or F-16," the IAF has told the government.
  • The IAF has also said Tejas needs 20 hours of serving for every hour of flying as against six hours for Gripen and 3.5 hours for F-16. --> The cost of maintaining the Tejas is much higher than the other fighters.
  • Also, both the F-16 and Gripen has a life-span of 40 years against just 20 of Tejas.
  • And, in some areas the vintage Russian made Mig-21 is better than Tejas, the IAF is understood to have told the government.
Ei ihme, että Intian ilmavoimat haluaisi ostaa länsimaisen hävittäjän...

Kun vanhat jutut nousevat esille, niin tässä voisi samalla vertailla F-16:n/Gripenin ja Rafalen payloadeja... :rolleyes: Mutta enpä taida viitsiä. :(
 
Eiköhän Intian ilmavoimilla ole käsitys asiasta. Intiaan tarjottu malli on Block 70, linkeissäsi puhutaan vanhemmista malleista (A ja C Block 50). Olisi ihan loogista kehitystä jos uudempaa teknologiaa käyttävä versio vaatisi myös vähemmän huoltoa.

Se tarkoittaisi, että se olisi ylivoimaisesti vähiten työtunteja vaativa kone kaikista maailman sotilaslentokoneista.

Tuohon on monta selitystä, miksi se ei todennäköisesti ole niin. Mutta, jos löydät lisää dataa, joka osoittaisi sellaista, niin tutustutaan mielellään.
 
Se tarkoittaisi, että se olisi ylivoimaisesti vähiten työtunteja vaativa kone kaikista maailman sotilaslentokoneista.

Tuohon on monta selitystä, miksi se ei todennäköisesti ole niin. Mutta, jos löydät lisää dataa, joka osoittaisi sellaista, niin tutustutaan mielellään.
Ei kai minulla mitään todistusvelvollisuutta ole Intian ilmavoimien esittämiin väitteisiin? Ehkä ovat totta, ehkä eivät. Tarkoitin vain sanoa, että linkkaamasi jutut joissa puhuttiin 20-30 vuotta vanhoista versioista eivät välttämättä kerro F-16:n nykyversion huoltotarpeesta ihan hirveästi. Eiköhän Gripeninkin huoltotarve ole pudonnut isosti Viggenin ajoista.
 
Lisää Malesiaa:
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-...a-grounds-mig-29s-and-rethinks-future-fighter

"RMAF official said that Malaysia would defer further evaluation of an MRCA until at least 2025, because of budget constraints"
"In another change of policy, the service has grounded its remaining airworthy MiG-29s instead of upgrading them,"
///
Ja Bulgariaa, joka alkaa hiukan haiskahtaa, että Ruotsalaiskoneen voitto ei sopinut hallituksen suunnitelmiin syventää USA-suhteita.
https://sofiaglobe.com/2017/11/10/d...aircraft-to-be-completed-by-end-of-july-2018/

"In recent months, the majority partner in government, Prime Minister Boiko Borissov’s GERB party, has been leaning towards an offer of F-16s from Portugal."
 

Sitä saa, mitä tilaa.

Kiitos kutsusta tanssiin, mutta toivottavasti et pahoita mieltä, jos passaan. En näe hirveästi mieltä jatkaa keskustelua teemasta tällä haavaa. Mielestäni mielekkäät asiat on jo käsitelty. Seurataan, kun asiasta tulee uutta.

Mutta, jos nuo asiat kiinnostavat, niin perehtymällä Intian ilmavoimiin noihin kysymyksiin varmaan saa lisävalaistusta. Minulla ei ole niihin valitettavasti vastauksia valmiina. Jos jaksat, niin jaa ihmeessä vastaukset palstalla.
 
Lisää Malesiaa:
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-...a-grounds-mig-29s-and-rethinks-future-fighter

"RMAF official said that Malaysia would defer further evaluation of an MRCA until at least 2025, because of budget constraints"
"In another change of policy, the service has grounded its remaining airworthy MiG-29s instead of upgrading them,"
///
Ja Bulgariaa, joka alkaa hiukan haiskahtaa, että Ruotsalaiskoneen voitto ei sopinut hallituksen suunnitelmiin syventää USA-suhteita.
https://sofiaglobe.com/2017/11/10/d...aircraft-to-be-completed-by-end-of-july-2018/

"In recent months, the majority partner in government, Prime Minister Boiko Borissov’s GERB party, has been leaning towards an offer of F-16s from Portugal."

Malesian tilanteeseen liittyen voisi linkittää tämän:

LIFT, MRCA and More
Marhalim Abas November 8, 2017 Malaysia - RMAF

BANGKOK: LIFT, MRCA and more. Far from the rain and humidity of Southeast Asia, RMAF long term plan has finally been articulated.

At a Berlin conference on Tuesday, a two-star RMAF officer offered a glimpse into its current situation and the service’s view of the future.

Here are some of the talking points and not at ad verbatim.

In the immediate term, it needs to get at least ten more F/A-18 Hornet airframes though it remained to be seen whether they will get them at anytime soon.

untitled-5950.jpg

M45-02 on finals on Sept. 29, 2017
The general said that they were mostly looking at the Kuwaiti Hornets as this was the most closest in term of specifications to its own Hornets. Ten single seaters will do nicely
High-hour Hornets though available, are not desirable.

Kuwait.jpg

Two Kuwait AF F/A-18C seen here with a couple of F-16s. Internet.

Another short term measure being look at is for the surveillance equipment onboard the three Beechcraft B200T be reinstalled on the CN-235s for them to serve as MPAs (As funding has not been announced we will have to see whether this will be done. ED)
MAB_9952.jpg

RMAF Hawk Mk108 firing FZ rockets at the Army’s Live Firing Exercise 2017. Destini is the supplier of the FZ rockets and its ancillary equipment.

Looking to the future, as the MRCA program has been shelved beyond 2020, the RMAF was looking at newer alternatives to the current offerings. He says they are looking beyond the 4.5 generation fighters.
marhalim-e1463699144266.jpg

RMAF MB-339CM M34-20 in a picture taken at the Cope Taufan in 2014 at Butterworth.
As for the Hawks and MB-339s, the service is looking to replace them in a 15 year time period (likely the same time as the MRCA is selected ED). This should be in the TA/FA-50 class with two squadrons as the minimum.

MAB_1343.jpg

ROKAF Black Eagles with their display.

On Monday, speaking to Malaysian journalists at the Defense and Security Exhibition here in Bangkok, RMAF chief Jen Affendi Buang says as the MPA program was just approved in the recent budget he cannot a give timeline for the purchase.
MAB_1549.jpg

The front end of the Leonardo ATR 72MP of the Italian Air Force displayed at LIMA 17. Note the various antennas and sensors.

He says they have to work around the budget allocated which was RM2.6 billion. A technical group was being set up to determine the specifications of the MPA.
CN235.jpg

CN235 MPA of TNI-AL displayed at LIMA 2015.

He likened the process of the MPA program at the moment as at “the merisik khabar” or the query stage before marriage. “We know the end stage but this is just the beginning”.
IMG_9302.jpg

RMAF CN235 M44-05 taxis past one of the new hangars built at Subang specifically for the A400M.

Asked whether it was reasonable to expect that the first MPA will be in service beyond 2020, Affendi says it was probable but it will be determined by when the allocation will be given.
He says an evaluation team was in Japan currently to inspect the P-3Cs offered to Malaysia.
p-3c_05l.jpg

Japan P-3C

Affendi says they have to decide whether it was worthwhile to put into service four 30-year old airframes even for a short time.
032.jpg

RMAF Beechcraft B200T MPA, M41-02

By coincidence, it must be noted that a JSMDF P-3C had undergone repairs at the Subang airbase recently. It flew in last week with another P-3C for an overnight stay.The other P-3C took off on schedule to Japan the next day but the other went un-servicable just prior to take off. The aircraft finally left for Japan earlier this week.
–Malaysian Defence

http://www.malaysiandefence.com/lift-mrca-and-more/#comment-288856
 
Ei kai minulla mitään todistusvelvollisuutta ole Intian ilmavoimien esittämiin väitteisiin? Ehkä ovat totta, ehkä eivät. Tarkoitin vain sanoa, että linkkaamasi jutut joissa puhuttiin 20-30 vuotta vanhoista versioista eivät välttämättä kerro F-16:n nykyversion huoltotarpeesta ihan hirveästi. Eiköhän Gripeninkin huoltotarve ole pudonnut isosti Viggenin ajoista.

Aesa-tutka on se merkittävin muuttuja. Vaikuttaa jotain. Mutta ei kuitenkaan noin paljon todennäköisesti.

Pelkästään koneen tarkastus, huollot ja valmistelu lentoa varten aamulla vaativat noin 2-3 miestyötuntia. Siihen nähden 3,6 kuulostaa kovin alhaiselta.
 
Back
Top