China's Ministry of State Security released details this week of three alleged security breaches that saw sensitive data illegally transferred abroad.
State-sponsored
Xinhua News Agency described the breaches as "endangering the security of important data" and said by disclosing them, the Ministry sought to build awareness of non-traditional security and, by doing so, better maintain national security.
The announcement, which deliberately coincides with the seventh anniversary of the country's
anti-espionage law, described airline data stolen by an overseas intelligence agency, shipping data collected by a consulting firm that provided it to a foreign spy agency, and the construction of weather devices to transfer sensitive meteorological data abroad. It is unclear whether one or more foreign intelligence agencies conducted the alleged attacks, or if the actions were linked.
"Data security is related to national security and public interest, and is an important aspect of non-traditional security," reads a machine translation of the
Xinhua piece, which goes on to encourage the public to report suspicious events to authorities.
The Middle Kingdom's anti-espionage law came into effect in 2014 and has been amended since. An April 2021 change imposed
new responsibilities on groups and organizations, making it clear the onus is on the public to watch out for, prevent, and report foreign espionage activity.
"The regulations … clarify that agencies, groups, enterprises and institutions and other social organizations have the main responsibility for the unit's anti-espionage security prevention work,"
stated the official newspaper of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP),
People’s Daily Online.
Chinese journalists Zhixin Wan and Zichen Wang have pointed out that foreign media have all but ignored the attacks.
"Whereas the US and other Western security sources are not infrequent contributors to Western media reports on China, usually detailing what's described as Chinese influence, threats, espionage, or hacking, the same simply can't be said of this side. Also, press content with those intelligence sources is almost always quite prominent in the news,"
wrote the duo.