Tästä kirjoittaneet toimittajat jättivät vapaaehtoisesti mullistavimman ominaisuuden ulos jutuistaan, jotteivat vaarantaisi joukkojensa etua taistelukentällä.
Tästä kirjoittaneet toimittajat jättivät vapaaehtoisesti mullistavimman ominaisuuden ulos jutuistaan, jotteivat vaarantaisi joukkojensa etua taistelukentällä.
Mannerheim 75. Saksalaiset kunnioittivat häntä.
Toimittajat eivät raportoineet uudesta strategiasta: Hitler päätti ettei keskitytä pohjoisen rintaman läpimurtoon vaan edetään etelämpänä.
Mannerheim 75. Saksalaiset kunnioittivat häntä.
Toimittajat eivät raportoineet uudesta strategiasta: Hitler päätti ettei keskitytä pohjoisen rintaman läpimurtoon vaan edetään etelämpänä.
Olettaen, että @krd ei puhunut viinanhimoisssaan Ranskalaisesta seiskavitosesta, vaan tykin kutsumanimestä, niin hän oli nopein ja saa vuoron. Jos ei ole hyvää kysyttävää valmiina, niin olen varma että @Ottoville hautoo jotain pähkinää meille purtavaksi, eli Krd, lauo tai syötä
Eli olin Ranskalaisten kenttätykki joka mullisti tykistön tehokkuuden, hydraulisella rekyylinhallintajärjestelmällä. Aiemmin tykki pomppasi joka laukauksella pois suunnastaan, ja piti tähdätä uudestaan, tämän jälkeen tykillä saattoi ampua tarkasti niin nopeasti kuin miehistö ehti, ja tykki kesti.
Tykin tarina:
Development of the Model 1897 began as part of the ongoing artillery arms race in the late 1800s. Improvements in explosives and metallurgy made it possible create more powerful cannons than ever before, but one problem plagued designers—recoil. Field guns that were small and light enough for easy transport would literally fly off their wheels at each shot, requiring the gun to be set back into position and aimed again before the next round was fired. If the gun was heavy enough to soak up the recoil forces, it was no longer transportable by a reasonably sized horse team. Recoil-absorbing systems were created, but none of those in general use did the job well enough to solve the problem, and the cannons still jumped upon firing.
In 1892, General Charles Mathieu, the French artillery director, came into possession of a secret German report concerning a revolutionary new cannon that utilized a new “long-recoil” principle. The weapon had advanced to the trial stage but had failed during testing. Still, Mathieu’s curiosity was piqued. Summoning the director of the government arsenal at Bourges, Mathieu asked if such a design could be made to work. The director returned to his arsenal to discuss the design with other engineers and officers; they returned after three days of study, saying the weapon’s design was simply not feasible. Mathieu was disappointed but not yet ready to give up. He contacted the director of another arsenal in Pateaux, just outside Paris, the Chatillon-Commentry Gun Foundry. The director, Colonel Albert Deport, took the German gun’s particulars and studied them for three days. When he returned, he announced to Mathieu that such a gun could indeed be made.
Development began under the strictest secrecy. All correspondence was kept confidential, including the weekly reports Deport made to Mathieu. No contracts were signed, nor did Mathieu seek approval from his superiors. “Misdirected” money from a fund normally used to buy property around Paris paid for the program, to the eventual cost of 300 million francs. Deport’s specification called for a weapon of 75mm caliber, but the heart of the new weapon would be the recoil system. Beneath the gun’s barrel lay a cradle that held two hydraulic cylinders. The top cylinder held hydraulic fluid, while the bottom held compressed gas. A port connected the two cylinders and a floating piston kept the gas and liquid apart. When the gun fired, the fluid was forced down through the port into the second cylinder, compressing the gas until the recoil energy was expended, at which point the gas pushed against the floating piston and forced the fluid back into the first cylinder. This “counterrecoil” pushed the gun back into firing position, ready for the next shot. The system worked so smoothly that the gun essentially stayed in place after firing without jumping, eliminating the need to re-aim it before firing again. This increased the rate of fire dramatically.
Secrecy about the new 75 was maintained even after the cannon entered service with the French Army. The floating piston was of particular interest to those wanting to copy the gun’s design because of the way it was sealed to prevent the fluid and gas from mixing. This was such an important detail that French artillery officers were forbidden to have any knowledge of it—in fact, they were not allowed to see the piston itself when it was disassembled from the gun. Various regulations were put into place to assure the secrecy of the 75’s internal mechanism. Only certain maintenance functions could be performed at the battery level, and even these had to be carried out with an officer present. French technical journals obligingly refrained from writing about the new recoil system as well.
The Model 1897 set a whole new standard of artillery performance. In the hands of a highly trained gun crew, rates of fire as high as 30 rounds per minute were possible.
A Reputation in War
As the war progressed, the Germans came to have a healthy respect for the 75. Even civilians gave testament to its power. After seeing a battery of 75s in action near Milhausen, France, one French citizen recalled observing a German artillery battery set up on high ground near a cemetery, posting their horses and limbers on some low ground nearby. As the man watched, a French battery of four 75s opened fire on the Germans and “demolished the material and killed almost all the cannoneers, directed its fire on the limbers posted in the bottom land and killed a great number of horses.”
Military Weapons: The French 75mm cannon
• October 22, 2018
The versatile and mobile French 75mm cannon was a revolutionary design that saw widespread use during both world wars.
Pahoittelut, pääsin tarkastamaan tilanteen vasta nyt.
Onnittelut, jos tarkoitit French 75:lla kenttätykkiä, etkä drinkkiä?
Tämä ainakin tarkoittaa oikeaa vastausta
Olettaen, että @krd ei puhunut viinanhimoisssaan Ranskalaisesta seiskavitosesta, vaan tykin kutsumanimestä, niin hän oli nopein ja saa vuoron. Jos ei ole hyvää kysyttävää valmiina, niin olen varma että @Ottoville hautoo jotain pähkinää meille purtavaksi, eli Krd, lauo tai syötä
Eli olin Ranskalaisten kenttätykki joka mullisti tykistön tehokkuuden, hydraulisella rekyylinhallintajärjestelmällä. Aiemmin tykki pomppasi joka laukauksella pois suunnastaan, ja piti tähdätä uudestaan, tämän jälkeen tykillä saattoi ampua tarkasti niin nopeasti kuin miehistö ehti, ja tykki kesti.
Tykin tarina:
Development of the Model 1897 began as part of the ongoing artillery arms race in the late 1800s. Improvements in explosives and metallurgy made it possible create more powerful cannons than ever before, but one problem plagued designers—recoil. Field guns that were small and light enough for easy transport would literally fly off their wheels at each shot, requiring the gun to be set back into position and aimed again before the next round was fired. If the gun was heavy enough to soak up the recoil forces, it was no longer transportable by a reasonably sized horse team. Recoil-absorbing systems were created, but none of those in general use did the job well enough to solve the problem, and the cannons still jumped upon firing.
In 1892, General Charles Mathieu, the French artillery director, came into possession of a secret German report concerning a revolutionary new cannon that utilized a new “long-recoil” principle. The weapon had advanced to the trial stage but had failed during testing. Still, Mathieu’s curiosity was piqued. Summoning the director of the government arsenal at Bourges, Mathieu asked if such a design could be made to work. The director returned to his arsenal to discuss the design with other engineers and officers; they returned after three days of study, saying the weapon’s design was simply not feasible. Mathieu was disappointed but not yet ready to give up. He contacted the director of another arsenal in Pateaux, just outside Paris, the Chatillon-Commentry Gun Foundry. The director, Colonel Albert Deport, took the German gun’s particulars and studied them for three days. When he returned, he announced to Mathieu that such a gun could indeed be made.
Development began under the strictest secrecy. All correspondence was kept confidential, including the weekly reports Deport made to Mathieu. No contracts were signed, nor did Mathieu seek approval from his superiors. “Misdirected” money from a fund normally used to buy property around Paris paid for the program, to the eventual cost of 300 million francs. Deport’s specification called for a weapon of 75mm caliber, but the heart of the new weapon would be the recoil system. Beneath the gun’s barrel lay a cradle that held two hydraulic cylinders. The top cylinder held hydraulic fluid, while the bottom held compressed gas. A port connected the two cylinders and a floating piston kept the gas and liquid apart. When the gun fired, the fluid was forced down through the port into the second cylinder, compressing the gas until the recoil energy was expended, at which point the gas pushed against the floating piston and forced the fluid back into the first cylinder. This “counterrecoil” pushed the gun back into firing position, ready for the next shot. The system worked so smoothly that the gun essentially stayed in place after firing without jumping, eliminating the need to re-aim it before firing again. This increased the rate of fire dramatically.
Secrecy about the new 75 was maintained even after the cannon entered service with the French Army. The floating piston was of particular interest to those wanting to copy the gun’s design because of the way it was sealed to prevent the fluid and gas from mixing. This was such an important detail that French artillery officers were forbidden to have any knowledge of it—in fact, they were not allowed to see the piston itself when it was disassembled from the gun. Various regulations were put into place to assure the secrecy of the 75’s internal mechanism. Only certain maintenance functions could be performed at the battery level, and even these had to be carried out with an officer present. French technical journals obligingly refrained from writing about the new recoil system as well.
The Model 1897 set a whole new standard of artillery performance. In the hands of a highly trained gun crew, rates of fire as high as 30 rounds per minute were possible.
A Reputation in War
As the war progressed, the Germans came to have a healthy respect for the 75. Even civilians gave testament to its power. After seeing a battery of 75s in action near Milhausen, France, one French citizen recalled observing a German artillery battery set up on high ground near a cemetery, posting their horses and limbers on some low ground nearby. As the man watched, a French battery of four 75s opened fire on the Germans and “demolished the material and killed almost all the cannoneers, directed its fire on the limbers posted in the bottom land and killed a great number of horses.”
Military Weapons: The French 75mm cannon
• October 22, 2018
The versatile and mobile French 75mm cannon was a revolutionary design that saw widespread use during both world wars.
Tykkiä tarkoitin. Jätin vastauksen tarkoituksella vähän viittaamaan myös drinkkisuuntaan kysymystä pohjustamaan. Nyt nopein poimii: nimeä vähintään kaksi drinkin nimeä jotka viittaavat myös sotilaiden käyttämään kalustoon.
Ainakin Oulun piispa Wallinmaa, jonka partisaanit surmasivat Ivalossa v. 1943. Tiedustelulaitoksen johtajan paikalta eläkkeelle lähtenyt tykkimies, eversti Sakari Wallinmaa on hänen pojanpoikansa. Onhän täällä perimätiedon mukaan surmattu piispa Henrtik myös, mutta viimeisin tutkimus on alentanut hänet ainoastaan lähetyssaarnaajksi.
