UAV / UCAV / LAR (robotit) Uutiset ja jutut

  • Viestiketjun aloittaja Viestiketjun aloittaja Raveni
  • Aloitus PVM Aloitus PVM
Kun ei näitä huollon äijiä usein näe, niin pistetään jenkkilästä muutama tuskailemassa RQ-9 Reaperin ympärillä.

1836795.jpg


1836789.jpg


Members from the 49th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron Avionics flight work as a cohesive unit during regular scheduled maintenance on the MQ-9 Reaper at Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., March 18, 2015. “Reliable teamwork and constant communication ensures our team is effective and sustains quality maintenance,” said Staff Sgt. Justin Wray, a 49th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron Avionic specialist craftsman. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. E’Lysia A. Wray/Released)

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forum...8-March-2015&p=7607093&viewfull=1#post7607093
 
Jenkki ilmavoimien maastopuku. Sama idea kuin merivoimien sinisävyisessä eli totaalinen turhake.

USN:n sinityylinen "maastopuku" on kyllä hirmuisen näköinen...ja jos se päällä putoaa mereen...niin eivät taatusti pelastajat löydä. Ehken se siinä onkin se tarkoitus? :P
 
Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University who develop snake-like robots have picked up a few tricks from real sidewinder rattlesnakes on how to make rapid and even sharp turns with their undulating, modular device.

Working with colleagues at the Georgia Institute of Technology and Zoo Atlanta, they have analyzed the motions of sidewinders and tested their observations on CMU's snake robots. They showed how the complex motion of a sidewinder can be described in terms of two wave motions - vertical and horizontal body waves - and how changing the phase and amplitude of the waves enables snakes to achieve exceptional maneuverability.

"We've been programming snake robots for years and have figured out how to get these robots to crawl amidst rubble and through or around pipes," said Howie Choset, professor at CMU's Robotics Institute.

"By learning from real sidewinders, however, we can make these maneuvers much more efficient and simplify user control. This makes our modular robots much more valuable as tools for urban search-and-rescue tasks, power plant inspections and even archaeological exploration."
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/C...llowing_the_lead_of_real_sidewinders_999.html

EOD toimintaan sopiva.
 
Naapurin UGV (Unmanned Ground Vehicle)


Miksi he eivät laita Kordia tuohon kiinni?
 
Russian Company KAMAZ is proposing to create an artificial city as a testing ground for unmanned vehicles. The project will cost about 5 billion rubles. By May of this year, the automaker will have prepared the details of its unmanned vehicles program, which is estimated to cost 18.5 billion rubles, 5 billion of which will be designated for the creation of an artificial city as a testing ground.
http://worlddefencenews.blogspot.com/2015/03/russian-company-kamaz-will-create.html
 
agRcHMa.jpg


DARPA's Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel (ACTUV) program seeks to develop a new type of unmanned surface vessel that could independently track adversaries' ultra-quiet diesel-electric submarines over thousands of miles. One of the challenges that the ACTUV program is addressing is development of autonomous behaviors for complying with the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, known as COLREGS.

Substantial progress has been made in developing and implementing those behaviors.

Currently, ACTUV's system for sensing other vessels is based on radar, which provides a "90 percent solution" for detecting other ships. However, radar is less suitable for classification of the type of other vessels, for example determining whether the vessel is a powered vessel or a sailboat. Additionally, one of the requirements of COLREGS is to maintain "a proper lookout by sight and hearing."

To help augment ACTUV's capability for sensing and classifying other vessels, and to reduce reliance on radar as ACTUV's primary sensor, DARPA has issued a Request for Information (RFI) (http://go.usa.gov/3rMPk) about currently available technologies that could help ACTUV and future unmanned surface vessels perceive and classify nearby ships and other objects.

DARPA is specifically interested in sensor systems and image-processing hardware and software that use passive (electro-optical/infrared, or EO/IR) or non-radar active (e.g., light detection and ranging, or LIDAR) approaches. The goal is to develop reliable, robust onboard systems that could detect and track nearby surface vessels and potential navigation hazards, classify those objects' characteristics and provide input to ACTUV's autonomy software to facilitate correct COLREGs behaviors.

"We're looking for test-ready, multi-sensor approaches that push the boundaries of today's automated sensing systems for unmanned surface vessels," said Scott Littlefield, DARPA program manager. "Enhancing the ability of these kinds of vessels to sense their environment in all weather and traffic conditions, day or night, would significantly advance our ability to conduct a range of military missions."

The RFI invites short responses (5 pages or fewer) that explore some or all of the following technical areas:

+ Maritime Perception Sensors: Any combination of non-radar-based imaging and tracking methods, including, but not limited to, passive and active imagers in the visible and infrared wavelengths and Class 1 Laser Rangefinder (LRF) and Flash LIDAR to image ships during day or night in the widest variety of environmental conditions, including haze, fog and rain, over ranges from 4 km to 15 km

+ Maritime Perception Software: Algorithms and software for detection, tracking and classification of ships by passive optical or non-radar active imagers

+ Classification Software for Day Shapes/Navigation Lights: Algorithms and software to support detection, tracking and classification of day shapes and navigation lights-standard tools that vessels use to communicate a ship's position and status-by using passive optical or non-radar active imagers

Responses are due to [email protected] by 4:00 PM Eastern Time on April 28, 2015. All technical and administrative correspondence and questions regarding this announcement and how to respond should be sent to [email protected].

ACTUV aims to persistently trail adversaries' submarines, limiting their tactical capacity for surprise. As designed, it would operate under sparse remote supervisory control but could also serve as a remotely piloted vessel, should the mission or specific circumstances require it.

With an envisioned price tag of $20 million per vessel, ACTUV aims to provide breakthrough capabilities at a price much lower than manned warships. Initial water-borne testing of an ACTUV prototype is scheduled for later this year.

In September 2014, DARPA signed a Memorandum of Agreement with the Office of Naval Research to jointly fund an extended test phase of an ACTUV prototype. Pending the results of those tests, the program could transition to the U.S. Navy in 2018 for use in anti-submarine warfare and possibly as a multipurpose unmanned "truck" for dirty, dull or dangerous missions, such as mine countermeasures.
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Wan...ookouts_for_Unmanned_Surface_Vessels_999.html
 
The robotic revolution that transformed warfare in the skies will soon extend to the deep sea, with underwater spy "satellites," drone-launching pods on the ocean floor and unmanned ships hunting submarines.

Officials at the US military's research agency outlined new programs this week that include a number of potentially groundbreaking technologies that could alter the way naval battles are fought, in the same way that robotic aircraft have altered warfare on land and in the air.

One proposed system envisages robot pods on the ocean floor that would be activated when needed.
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Future_US_Navy_robotic_sub-hunters_deepsea_pods_999.html
 
large_p02.jpg


There are a few cases in which 4K video would be a noticeable improvement over plain old 1080p. An aerial fly-by of a Scottish moor, a sweeping pass over an alpine meadow, or a close inspection of your friends’ bald spots would be three such cases.

That’s all possible with the latest version of the the DJI Phantom 3 Professional drone. The flying machine—an update to DJI’s previous, popular Phantom drones—comes equipped with an integrated 4K camera mounted on a three-axis gimbal that keeps footage as butter-smooth as it is tack-sharp. In 4K mode, the camera captures at either 24 or 30 frames per second. It also shoots 1080p video at 24, 30, or 60fps. If you can do without the 4K capabilities, there’s a step-down model called the DJI Phantom 3 Advanced that offers the same 1080p frame rates of 24, 30, or 60.

These things haul a fair amount of ass, too. The top speed for each model is about 35mph, and if you’re comfortable with letting these flying one-pound beasts careen around your apartment, DJI says the newly designed drones are also suited for indoor use. That’s thanks to a ground-facing positioning system that uses ultrasound and additional cameras to identify what it’s flying over, meaning you don’t always need to use its GPS tech.

These flying cameras cost as much as a decent DSLR. The lower-end DJI Phantom 3 Advanced is priced at $1,000 with all the fixins, while the 4K-capable Phantom 3 Professional comes in at $1,260.
http://www.wired.com/2015/04/dji-4k-drones/
 

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — A new era in autonomy and unmanned systems for naval operations is on the horizon, as officials at the Office of Naval Research (ONR) announced today recent technology demonstrations of swarming unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) — part of the Low-Cost UAV Swarming Technology (LOCUST) program.

LOCUST can launch swarming UAVs to autonomously overwhelm an adversary. The deployment of UAV swarms will provide Sailors and Marines a decisive tactical advantage.
http://www.onr.navy.mil/en/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2015/LOCUST-low-cost-UAV-swarm-ONR.aspx
 
Koska perjantai

2e8b08aa-8e82-4059-9c00-1a2983a342ae-1429048531670.jpg

On Monday of this week, a man threatening to jump from a Silicon Valley freeway overpass peacefully turned himself in to police, after a robot intervened in what had been a more than five-hour standoff.

Just before 1 pm, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) got a call about a man standing on an overpass linking Highway 680 and Highway 280 in San Jose. The man had a knife, and appeared to be ready to jump onto the freeway below.

The CHP shut down southbound 280 and 680 at Highway 101, leading to an epic rush hour traffic jam while police tried to convince the man to give himself up. Ultimately, a robot, specifically, a Northrup Grumman Remotec Andros F6A, more typically used for bomb disposal, saved the day.

Here’s how the situation evolved, according to Chris Sciba, a sergeant with the San Jose Police Department’s Mobile Emergency Response Group and Equipment Unit, who I spoke with shortly after the incident:

“A subject was walking on high overpass. An officer pulled up and made contact with him, at some point the officer saw a knife and backed off. The subject positioned himself in manner that made CHP think he was going to jump. CHP [called in] the San Jose Police Department.

“Because nobody wanted to force a confrontation with a suicidal man with a knife, the MERGE unit was asked to come out with trained negotiators. We took positions about 150 yards to either side of subject on the overpass.

“Negotiaters attempted to talk to him via a remote PA system, but that is not the optimal way of talking to him, so the decision was made to deliver a phone to him. The safest way to do that and not cause confrontation was to use a robot.

“[Because] delivering food is a way of encouraging someone to do something we want them to do, we sent pizza with phone. We [instructed the subject] that if he wanted the pizza released, to pick up the phone. The robot was holding the pizza, it released the pizza once the subject picked up phone to talk to negotiators.

“The robot was also equipped with cameras, audio, and a speaker, so we were able to get a closer look at [the subject], see how he was armed, see what he did with knife, and observe facial expressions, to see if he appeared agitated.

“Our negotiators were able to convince him to surrender. At that point he dropped the knife, and the robot was able to confirm that. Then he walked up to officers and was taken into custody [just after 7 pm, less than an hour after the robot got involved] without incident.”

Just another day on the job for a San Jose Robocop.
http://spectrum.ieee.org/view-from-...obots/robocop-delivers-pizza-prevents-suicide
 


  • Manipuloitu kuva Riihimäen vankilan muureista ja pienoiskopterista. Riihimäen vankila on jo varautunut lentolaitteiden käyttöyrityksiin. Kuva: Yle
    Suomen vankilat ovat varautuneet pienoislennokkien aiheuttamiin ongelmiin. Rikosseuraamuslaitoksen turvallisuudesta ja kiinteistöistä vastaava ylitarkastaja Ari Juuti kertoo, että lennokkien aiheuttama ongelma on ollut laitoksen tiedossa jo jonkin aikaa.

    – On selvää, että kokeiluja nähdään Suomessakin. Toistaiseksi ainoa havaittu tapaus on ollut pikkupojilta vankilan pihalle vahingossa lentänyt lennokki, mutta salakuljetukseen varaudutaan.

    Tekniikka ja Talous -lehden mukaan ulkomailla ainakin Yhdysvalloissa, Irlannissa, Britanniassa, Australiassa ja Kanadassa on havaittu toimintaa, jossa lennokilla on yritetty viedä tavaraa vangeille.

    Vankiloillakin on keinonsa estää luvatonta lennokkitoimintaa
    Vankilanjohtaja Tommi Saarinen Riihimäen vankilasta kertoo, että vankilat ovat jo varautuneet lentolaitteiden varalta.

    – Työtä tehdään koko ajan ja tekniikkaakin vankiloissa on. Lähinnä liikkeen havaitsevat kamerat ja laserverhot ovat käytössä, paljastaa Saarinen eräitä keinoja havaita lennokkeja.

    Viime vuosien aikana erilaisten pienoiskoneiden ja -helikoptereiden hinnat ovat laskeneet ja niiden kauppa on lisääntynyt huomattavasti. Esimerkiksi maasta ohjattavan pienoiskopterin saa muutamalla kympillä ja tasokkaan laitteen muutamalla satasella.

    Muukin tekniikka vankiloiden harmina
    Vankilat joutuvat painimaan muunkin teknisen kehityksen kanssa.

    – Tekniikka pienenee koko ajan. Kelloissa voi olla kameraa, puhelinta ja nettiyhteyskin, kertoo ylitarkastaja Ari Juuti.

    Vangeilla ei ole oikeutta käyttää omaa puhelinta muurien sisällä, joten tekniset vempaimet on kielletty.

    – Toisaalta myös valvontatekniikkakin paranee koko ajan, huomauttaa Juuti.
    http://yle.fi/uutiset/halventuneet_...aa_etta_kokeiluja_nahdaan_suomessakin/7951675
 
Back
Top