Vihdoinkin totuus paljastui
!
Separatistijohtaja: MH17-lennon matkustajat kuolivat jo ennen nousua
Pelastustyöntekijät yrittivät torstai-iltana etsiä eloonjääneitä MH-17 lennon putoamispaikalta Itä-Ukrainasta.
Alexander Khudoteply
Julkaistu: 19.7.2014 5:52
MH17 Separatistijohtaja
Igor Girkin on tehnyt eriskummallisen väitteen alasammutun Malaysia Airlinesin lentokoneen matkustajien kohtalosta. Asiasta uutisoi brittilehti
Daily Mail.
Lehden mukaan Igor Girkin, joka tunnetaan myös salanimellä
Igor Strelkov, on väittänyt lentokoneen maahansyöksypaikalta löytyneiden ruumiiden olevan vanhoja. Girkin väittää uhrien kuolleen jo päiviä ennen kuin Amsterdamista Kuala Lumpuriin matkalla ollut kone edes nousi ilmaan.
Girkin perustaa väitteensä onnettomuuspaikalta saamiinsa silminnäkijähavaintoihin. Maahansyöksypaikalla käyneet henkilöt ovat raportoineet uhrien olleen verettömiä ja mätänemistilassa. Lisäksi turmakoneen ympäristöstä Girkin kertoo löydetyn runsaasti lääkkeitä sekä veriseerumia.
KUVA: PHOTOMIG
Separatistijohtaja Igor Girkin on käyttänyt itsestään salanimeä Igor Strelkov.
- Ukrainalaiset ovat kyvykkäitä kaikenlaiseen moraalittomuuteen, Girkinin kerrotaan todenneen.
Daily Mailin mukaan Girkin oli lähellä paikkaa, josta kuolettava ohjus ammuttiin ilmojen teille. Pian osuman jälkeen separatistijohtaja lähetti Twitterin kautta voittoisan viestin:
- Me varoitimme teitä - älkää lentäkö taivaallamme.
Daily Mailin mukaan Girkin luuli vielä tuolloin, että osuman saanut kone oli Ukrainan armeijan käytössä ollut kuljetuskone Antonov-26. Tietojen täsmennyttyä, Twitter-viesti poistettiin.
Venäjä vaatii vastuksia!
Malaysia MH17 crash: 10 questions Russia wants Ukraine to answer
Published time: July 18, 2014 20:59
Get short URL
Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov (A still image from RT video)
6.5K87412
Trends
Ukraine turmoil
Tags
Accident,
Planes,
Politics,
Russia,
Scandal,
Transport,
Ukraine
Some Western states and Kiev rushed to find Russian involvement in the MH17 crash having no evidence to back their claims, Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister told RT. He invited Ukraine to answer 10 questions to prove their commitment to an impartial probe.
Speaking to RT, Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov has criticized Western countries for jumping to conclusions just “24 hours after the crash” while there is no evidence.
“They try to show to the whole world that we are responsible for the crash. It is very strange that without any evidence my colleagues from western media would like to find somebody who is responsible for the crash,” Antonov said.
“It seems to me that this is part of information warfare which has been started against the Russian Federation and armed forces.”
READ MORE:
Unverified tape released by Kiev presented as ‘proof’ E. Ukraine militia downed MH17
Instead of using the incident as the pretext for groundlessly blaming one of the sides, the catastrophe over Ukrainian sky should be used as a possibility to restart cooperation to
“prevent such tragedies in the future.”
“As for me, I don’t want to use this opportunity to blame anybody. I would just like to raise few questions for my colleagues from the armed forces of Ukraine,” Antonov said.
“I hope they try to answer the questions, it will be a good opportunity for us to realize where we are, whether there is a possibility for us to restart cooperation and to find who is really responsible for the tragedy.”
“Answers for these questions could help us find an opportunity to prevent such tragedies in the future,” the Deputy Defense Minister said.
A picture taken on July 17, 2014 shows the wreckages of the malaysian airliner carrying 295 people from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur after it crashed, near the town of Shaktarsk. (AFP Photo / Dominique Faget)
TEN QUESTIONS FOR THE UKRAINIAN AUTHORITIES
1. Immediately after the tragedy, the Ukrainian authorities, naturally, blamed it on the self-defense forces. What are these
accusations based on?
2. Can Kiev explain in detail how it uses
Buk missile launchers in the conflict zone? And why were these systems
deployed there in the first place, seeing as the self-defense forces don’t have any planes?
3. Why are the Ukrainian authorities not doing anything to set up an
international commission? When will such a commission begin its work?
4. Would the Ukrainian Armed Forces be willing to let international investigators see the inventory of their air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles, including those used in SAM launchers?
5. Will the international commission have access to tracking data from reliable sources regarding the movements of Ukrainian warplanes on the day of the tragedy?
6. Why did Ukrainian air traffic controllers allow the plane to
deviate from the regular route to the north, towards
“the anti-terrorist operation zone”?
7. Why was airspace over the warzone not
closed for civilian flights, especially since the area was not entirely covered by radar navigation systems?
8. How can official Kiev comment on reports in the social media, allegedly by a Spanish air traffic controller who works in Ukraine, that there were two Ukrainian military planes flying alongside the Boeing 777 over Ukrainian territory?
9. Why did Ukraine’s Security Service start working with the recordings of communications between Ukrainian air traffic controllers and the Boeing crew and with the data storage systems from Ukrainian radars without waiting for international investigators?
10. What lessons has Ukraine learned from a
similar incident in 2001, when a Russian Tu-154 crashed into the Black Sea? Back then, the Ukrainian authorities denied any involvement on the part of Ukraine’s Armed Forces until irrefutable evidence proved official Kiev to be guilty.
