Itse havahduin myös yhtä-äkkiä katsoessani sen yhden kujanjuoksua, että onhan tämä vastenmielistä touhua. Ja kyllä, sitä sota on mutta nyt tämä videopelityyli vie sen näyttämisen uudelle tasolle.
Ukrainan konflikti/sota
missileman
Kenraali
Tankkimiehistön lähtö taivaaseen
ddude
Majuri
Nyt oot hieman ankara Zelenskylle ei Roomaakaan päivässä rakennettu.Juuri näin, infovaikuttaminen ns. ryssittiintaas kerran. On aivan turha kiistää etteikö melkoinen, ehkä jopa suurin, osa ukrainalaisista olisi ollut valmis jopa liittymään zenäjään JOS kortit olisi pelattu oikein. No kremlin 4D shakkimestari pelasi suurimman slaavikansan yhdistyneeksi ikiviholliseksi, että siis ei pelattu oikein..
Ei tuon Ukrainankaan yhteiskunta paljon hurraamista ansaitse. Zelenskyi oli/on tietysti raikas tuulahdus ja olisi ehkä saanut jotain aikaan, siis korruption vähentämistä ja järkeviä päätöksiä talouteen ym. mutta harvoin yksi mies pystyy koko maan kurssia kääntämään. Tai no joskus sentään; Deng, Gandhi..
Baltian maissakin kesti korruption haihtuminen itsenäistymisen jälkeen yli vuosikymmenen.
Joo tuosta Sadatin murhasta postailinkin jo vk sitten.
Punaisen torin paraateissa on ollut ns. parempia joukkoja pääosin (VDV ym) jotta kansa saa ihastella maailman 2. parasta armeijaa.
Nyt sattuneesta syystä ei ole ( edes ) marssimiseen kykeneviä joukkoja. Aikaisemmin paraatijoukkoja harjoitettiin kuukausien ajan täsmällisyyteen jne.
Ryysyläis-mobikkeja ei oikein voi laittaa torille lompsimaan...
Ei ole kyllä mitään kalustoakaan mitä esitellä...
RKSTAK
Ylipäällikkö
Fremen
Greatest Leader
Siis mitä helvettiä tää Daily Mailin kolumnisti nyt päästelee..?
www.dailymail.co.uk
Who decided to send the SAS to Ukraine? What are they doing there? What would happen were they to be killed by Russian forces, or captured by them? And what was a British surveillance plane, capable of carrying 30 people, doing over the Black Sea last September, when a bungling Russian pilot almost shot it down, only failing because his missile was a dud? What would have happened if the missile had worked, and many British servicemen and women had died?
Nobody will answer these questions when I ask them. Once upon a time, we had a proper Parliament in which brave, indomitable MPs such as the late Tam Dalyell would pursue such matters. Perhaps, even now, some courageous man or woman is getting ready to step into Tam Dalyell’s shoes. I do hope so.
We can be pretty sure that the leaked documents revealing these facts are accurate, given the ferocious reaction of the US authorities to their publication. By the way, you may be sure that the Kremlin will have known about all this for many months. The cloud of secrecy around such matters is (as so often) there to keep the British and American publics in ignorance, not to keep hostile powers in the dark.
Meanwhile, as far as I know, this country is not at war with Russia. If we did enter such a war, as a Nato member, we would instantly widen the current conflict to cover the whole of Europe. Can you begin to imagine what that would involve? How would the people of this country gain by such events? Is anybody thinking about what we are doing?
First of all, what interest does the United Kingdom have in continuing and sustaining this war? A powerful faction in Washington DC, with supporters in the West Wing of the White House, the Pentagon, the State Department and the CIA, have long wanted a proxy war with Russia. They believe passionately that Russia must never be allowed to rise again. This faction, whose founding document is known as The Wolfowitz Doctrine, have been hard at work since 1992, .... samaa lätinää jatkuu vielä melko tovin.
Kuka helvetti tämän toimituksellisen linjan nyt on yllättäen hyväksynyt? Mekö tää nyt sitten saatana aloitettiin, ja jatketaan vielä perkele--?
PETER HITCHENS: Why are the SAS in Ukraine?
PETER HITCHENS: Who decided to send the SAS to Ukraine? What are they doing there? What would happen were they to be killed by Russian forces, or captured by them?
Who decided to send the SAS to Ukraine? What are they doing there? What would happen were they to be killed by Russian forces, or captured by them? And what was a British surveillance plane, capable of carrying 30 people, doing over the Black Sea last September, when a bungling Russian pilot almost shot it down, only failing because his missile was a dud? What would have happened if the missile had worked, and many British servicemen and women had died?
Nobody will answer these questions when I ask them. Once upon a time, we had a proper Parliament in which brave, indomitable MPs such as the late Tam Dalyell would pursue such matters. Perhaps, even now, some courageous man or woman is getting ready to step into Tam Dalyell’s shoes. I do hope so.
We can be pretty sure that the leaked documents revealing these facts are accurate, given the ferocious reaction of the US authorities to their publication. By the way, you may be sure that the Kremlin will have known about all this for many months. The cloud of secrecy around such matters is (as so often) there to keep the British and American publics in ignorance, not to keep hostile powers in the dark.
Meanwhile, as far as I know, this country is not at war with Russia. If we did enter such a war, as a Nato member, we would instantly widen the current conflict to cover the whole of Europe. Can you begin to imagine what that would involve? How would the people of this country gain by such events? Is anybody thinking about what we are doing?
First of all, what interest does the United Kingdom have in continuing and sustaining this war? A powerful faction in Washington DC, with supporters in the West Wing of the White House, the Pentagon, the State Department and the CIA, have long wanted a proxy war with Russia. They believe passionately that Russia must never be allowed to rise again. This faction, whose founding document is known as The Wolfowitz Doctrine, have been hard at work since 1992, .... samaa lätinää jatkuu vielä melko tovin.
Kuka helvetti tämän toimituksellisen linjan nyt on yllättäen hyväksynyt? Mekö tää nyt sitten saatana aloitettiin, ja jatketaan vielä perkele--?
Aijai, vaarallisia puheita...
Wagner-johtaja esittää sodan lopettamista | Verkkouutiset
Wagner-johtaja esittää sodan lopettamista | Verkkouutisetwww.verkkouutiset.fi
Keittäjälle on käynyt mielessä ettei venäjä voi siirtää puolustuksen painopistettä vastaamaan 3 panssaridivisioonan hyökkäykseen. Nyt vaan odotellaan mitä uraa tämä fasistinen homonatsilauma lähtee ratkaisua hakemaan.
Minä olen pitkään miettinyt, että tuo haastattelu pitäisi tekstittää ja mahdollisesti muutenkin puhdistaa nykypäivän standardien tasolle tai ainakin sille tasolle mihin mahdollista. Yllättäen se tekstitys tulee sitten suomen kielelle.
Sodan aikana huomannut tämän Peter Hitchensin kulman asiaan, joka on vähintäänkin erikoinen. Olisi kiva tietää mitä hänen edesmennyt veljensä huippu toimittaja ja kirjailija Christopher Hitchens olisi tästä sodasta mieltä. Voi olla että hiemarin erilaista tekstiä tulisi häneltä..Siis mitä helvettiä tää Daily Mailin kolumnisti nyt päästelee..?
PETER HITCHENS: Why are the SAS in Ukraine?
PETER HITCHENS: Who decided to send the SAS to Ukraine? What are they doing there? What would happen were they to be killed by Russian forces, or captured by them?
Who decided to send the SAS to Ukraine? What are they doing there? What would happen were they to be killed by Russian forces, or captured by them? And what was a British surveillance plane, capable of carrying 30 people, doing over the Black Sea last September, when a bungling Russian pilot almost shot it down, only failing because his missile was a dud? What would have happened if the missile had worked, and many British servicemen and women had died?
Nobody will answer these questions when I ask them. Once upon a time, we had a proper Parliament in which brave, indomitable MPs such as the late Tam Dalyell would pursue such matters. Perhaps, even now, some courageous man or woman is getting ready to step into Tam Dalyell’s shoes. I do hope so.
We can be pretty sure that the leaked documents revealing these facts are accurate, given the ferocious reaction of the US authorities to their publication. By the way, you may be sure that the Kremlin will have known about all this for many months. The cloud of secrecy around such matters is (as so often) there to keep the British and American publics in ignorance, not to keep hostile powers in the dark.
Meanwhile, as far as I know, this country is not at war with Russia. If we did enter such a war, as a Nato member, we would instantly widen the current conflict to cover the whole of Europe. Can you begin to imagine what that would involve? How would the people of this country gain by such events? Is anybody thinking about what we are doing?
First of all, what interest does the United Kingdom have in continuing and sustaining this war? A powerful faction in Washington DC, with supporters in the West Wing of the White House, the Pentagon, the State Department and the CIA, have long wanted a proxy war with Russia. They believe passionately that Russia must never be allowed to rise again. This faction, whose founding document is known as The Wolfowitz Doctrine, have been hard at work since 1992, .... samaa lätinää jatkuu vielä melko tovin.
Kuka helvetti tämän toimituksellisen linjan nyt on yllättäen hyväksynyt? Mekö tää nyt sitten saatana aloitettiin, ja jatketaan vielä perkele--?
viimeinen mohikaani
Majuri
Dronelle antautumisesta on olemassa ohjeet. Jos eivät ymmärrä antautua, niin piruako mobilikkeja lajittelemaan? Oikeassa armeijassa jokainen haavoittunut sitoo neljä muuta taistelijaa, joten laaki ja vainaa ei ole tavoiteltava lopputulos. Jos rysyn rosvolaumassa haavoittuneet eivät kiinnosta ketään, niin omapa on ongelmansa. Suomen kannalta ryssien massaparhauttaminen on tietysti pelkkää plussaa, kun ne ei muuten ymmärrä pysyä omalla tontillaan. Kikkelis kokkelis, mitäs läksivät!
Kaarne
Majuri
Taisi olla samainen Daily Fail mikä veti vastaavaa linjaa Georgian sodasta.Siis mitä helvettiä tää Daily Mailin kolumnisti nyt päästelee..?
PETER HITCHENS: Why are the SAS in Ukraine?
PETER HITCHENS: Who decided to send the SAS to Ukraine? What are they doing there? What would happen were they to be killed by Russian forces, or captured by them?
Who decided to send the SAS to Ukraine? What are they doing there? What would happen were they to be killed by Russian forces, or captured by them? And what was a British surveillance plane, capable of carrying 30 people, doing over the Black Sea last September, when a bungling Russian pilot almost shot it down, only failing because his missile was a dud? What would have happened if the missile had worked, and many British servicemen and women had died?
Nobody will answer these questions when I ask them. Once upon a time, we had a proper Parliament in which brave, indomitable MPs such as the late Tam Dalyell would pursue such matters. Perhaps, even now, some courageous man or woman is getting ready to step into Tam Dalyell’s shoes. I do hope so.
We can be pretty sure that the leaked documents revealing these facts are accurate, given the ferocious reaction of the US authorities to their publication. By the way, you may be sure that the Kremlin will have known about all this for many months. The cloud of secrecy around such matters is (as so often) there to keep the British and American publics in ignorance, not to keep hostile powers in the dark.
Meanwhile, as far as I know, this country is not at war with Russia. If we did enter such a war, as a Nato member, we would instantly widen the current conflict to cover the whole of Europe. Can you begin to imagine what that would involve? How would the people of this country gain by such events? Is anybody thinking about what we are doing?
First of all, what interest does the United Kingdom have in continuing and sustaining this war? A powerful faction in Washington DC, with supporters in the West Wing of the White House, the Pentagon, the State Department and the CIA, have long wanted a proxy war with Russia. They believe passionately that Russia must never be allowed to rise again. This faction, whose founding document is known as The Wolfowitz Doctrine, have been hard at work since 1992, .... samaa lätinää jatkuu vielä melko tovin.
Kuka helvetti tämän toimituksellisen linjan nyt on yllättäen hyväksynyt? Mekö tää nyt sitten saatana aloitettiin, ja jatketaan vielä perkele--?
PH on jokseenkin omalaatuinen. Hänen mielestään UK:n ei olisi pitänyt ollenkaan osallistua 1. Maailmansotaan, impeiumista luopuminen oli virhe ja länsimaisen sivistyksen kohtalo riippuu monarkiasta, Englannin kirkon säilymisestä ja parlamentin konservatiiveista. EU on Saksan työrukkanen ja yleisesti ottaen ukko on täysin Englanti-keskeinen. Skotlannin ja Irlannin olemassaolo huomioidaan, mutta muu maailma on vain kuriositeetti jonka pitäisi ymmärtää seurata sivistyneen maailman johtajan esimerkkiä.
Siis mitä helvettiä tää Daily Mailin kolumnisti nyt päästelee..?
PETER HITCHENS: Why are the SAS in Ukraine?
PETER HITCHENS: Who decided to send the SAS to Ukraine? What are they doing there? What would happen were they to be killed by Russian forces, or captured by them?
Lännempänä Euroopassa (ja Amerikassa) kansallismielinen konservatiivisuus tuntuu hyvin usein tarkoittavan samalla jonkinasteista Venäjän sympatisointia. Putin nähdään perinteisten arvojen vaalijana ja woken vastustajana, mikä sitten luo positiivisen lähestymiskulman Venäjän tekemisiin.
tulikomento
Supreme Leader
Trump on näköjään muutama päivä sitten antanut Foxilla lausuntoja Ukrainasta. USA oli kuulemma Nord Streamin tuhoamisen takana. Putler "rakastaa Ukrainaa". Ja Trump antaa ymmärtää etteivät ukrainalaiset nyt kovin kummoisia sotilaita ole.
www.businessinsider.com
Trump is trying to win more GOP voters with bizarre takes on the Ukraine war and praise for Putin
Trump praised Putin as "very smart" amid the stalemated and brutal conflict that the Russian leader ordered and oversees.
www.businessinsider.com
Ev. Kurtz
Kersantti
Näitä anoturtiaisia ja hännystelijitä meillä täälläkin on. Putin on ikään kuin pelastamassa Eurooppaa degeneraatiolta. Nää tyypit olisivat valmiita myymään Suomen itseänäisyyden Putinille, kunhan vaan säästymme kaikelta moraalittomalta pahalta. Sairasta porukkaa.
putkirassi
Kapteeni
On Peterillä pelimerkit hukassa. Jos Venäjää ei pysäytetä on jossain vaiheessa taas BOB , Battle of Britain. Sitäkö pitäisi odotella kuten 1939..40 rauhaa hinnalla millä hyvänsä vaikka oma maa menisi.
Etkö tosiaan ole koskaan törmäyt sanaan "tsuhna"?