Uusi taistelijan ase

https://americanmilitarynews.com/20...ook&utm_campaign=alt&utm_source=militarymemes
Army’s XM25 program officially goes kaput
Soldiers from Task Force Stalwart, which is compromised of Soldiers from 1st Battalion, 41st Infantry Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, pose for a group photo, March 28, 2018, in a post in the outskirts of Afghanistan. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. 1st Class Jasmine L. Flowers/2nd IBCT UPAR)
AUGUST 13, 2018 CHAD GARLAND - STARS AND STRIPES

Share37
Tweet
+1
34SHARES

The Army has formally terminated its effort to develop a 25 mm airburst weapon, the largest of nearly three dozen ways a Pentagon watchdog has said the military could save $2.3 billion in defense spending.
The ill-fated weapon, known as the XM25 and nicknamed “The Punisher,” was once hailed as a game-changer for ground troops who would be able to use it to target enemies hiding behind cover. But it came under closer scrutiny several years ago after schedule slippage, cost overruns and aborted operational testing in Afghanistan.
Our new media outlet SITREP: China is exclusively reporting on China's military and global expansion.
Go like the Facebook page now!

In 2016, the Pentagon inspector general recommended that the Army consider ending the program and instead invest its nearly $1 billion in funding elsewhere. The program remained in limbo since early last year, when the Army canceled its contract with main contractor Orbital ATK Inc., but an Army official overseeing the effort could not clarify its overall status.
The shoulder-fired, semi-automatic weapon was designed to fire 25 mm high-explosive grenades that burst in mid-air over enemy troops taking cover behind walls or inside bunkers or trenches where they’re difficult to hit.
This week, Army officials said that the service’s top acquisition official had signed a memorandum terminating the program on July 24, after a negotiated settlement with Orbital ATK that allowed the military to retain intellectual property rights and hardware developed as part of the effort.

“After cancelling the program last year, the Army has since received rights to the program’s research and development,” Lt. Col. Isaac Taylor, an Army spokesman, said Thursday in a statement. “This is in addition to the 20 existing XM25 systems — to include high explosive air-burst and target practice rounds — that the Army garnered as part of the negotiated settlement.”
The statement came in response to a report from the Pentagon IG last week highlighting the program in a list of more than 1,500 recommendations for cutting waste or improving efficiency.
Operational testing of the XM25 in Afghanistan from 2010 to 2013 delivered mixed results and was halted after three soldiers were slightly injured by malfunctions. After an initial assessment, an Army Ranger unit had reportedly refused to take the cumbersome weapon on a raid in place of a primary weapon like an M4.
A key complaint was that the weapon’s basic load of 36 rounds was heavy and easily depleted during direct-fire engagements, an IG audit report said in 2016, when the watchdog first recommended that Army leaders decide whether to close the weapon program after further testing that year.
After the IG released its first compendium listing nearly 1,300 unresolved recommendations last summer, DOD made a concerted effort to address those items, resolving more than 400 of them.
“We believe it is important for the OIG to track, report on and focus attention on those recommendations,” said Glenn Fine, acting head of the Pentagon’s Office of Inspector General, or OIG, in a video that accompanied the release of the latest list.
“We believe these concerted efforts … are a positive step and an important outgrowth of our compendium,” he said.

This year’s compilation of recommended cuts and corrective actions includes hundreds of new items alongside many that have lingered for years. The oldest is a 2006 call for the services and key defense agencies to overhaul security clearance policies.
Some 30 of the suggested actions say the Pentagon could better use its funds or recoup money already spent, such as a nearly five-year-old recommendation that the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support recoup premium transportation fees on a contract in Afghanistan that could net an estimated $630 million if enacted.
In another case, the IG estimated that DOD could recover more than $100 million in possible improper charges on a contract for a Counter Narco-Terrorism Technology Program in Afghanistan.
Though the exact potential monetary benefit for the XM25’s cancellation was redacted, a Stars and Stripes analysis of the figures shows it alone could account for around $970 million of the $2.3 billion total potential savings.
———
© 2018 the Stars and Stripes
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Share37
Tweet
+1
34SHARES
 
airsoft-rifle-airman-1800.jpg


If Dan Sullivan could use small drones to keep an eye in the sky over U.S. air bases, he would. But that may be a future strategy to survey wildlife lurking near military airfields, posing a risk to aircraft.

Drones would negate the need for airmen to suit up and wade through swampy areas around bases to look for animals. And "if your drone is equipped with a forward-looking infrared, at night it could pick up deer, hogs, coyotes … and having that drone pick up heat flying around, that would be a great asset for a BASH program," Sullivan, the Air Force's wildlife biologist and the Bird/Wildlife Aircraft Strike Hazard chief, said in a recent interview with Military.com.

While drone use remains debatable in terms of safety and vulnerabilities, Sullivan said there is a growing need for them and other technologies as wildlife finds refuge near installations that house major aviation operations.

But for now, he said, he'll settle for having more airmen trained in spotting bothersome wildlife and how to safely confront it. "I'm looking to institute a more in-depth training [program] here at the [Air Force Safety Center], more for folks that are boots on the ground."
https://www.military.com/defensetec...s-air-forces-bird-strike-mission-expands.html

"My policy is zero tolerance from mammals such as deer, coyote, elk. If they're on your airfield, get rid of them," Sullivan said. "If you can't let them out safely, then you're going to have to remove them lethally." But "the last thing we want to do is kill wildlife," he added.

Large mammals drive up costs, especially in potential damage, he said. To keep them away, vegetation must be kept between seven and 14 inches high and there must be adequate water drainage and fences, among other factors.

Some techniques regularly used to scare animals away include nonlethal pyrotechnic guns, noise makers ("screamers" and "bangers," as Sullivan called them), propane cannons and airsoft guns.

May said shooting the animals is usually the last resort. Poisoning isn't a common practice.

Sullivan said the Air Force must seek permits through various agencies, notably the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, to use lethal force. The service encourages working with state agencies before killing certain species, which may be on the endangered list.

"Within that, there are a limited number of birds we can take [out], but we regularly maintain well below that number," May said.

While the Trump administration has mulled rolling back policies that protect numerous species, Sullivan doesn't expect Air Force bases to increase the number of animals killed.

"Even if they did give us [those authorities], we wouldn't do it," he said. "Everything that we've been doing over the past number of years hasn't changed. The Air Force is not going to do anything different."

Look at Species, Not Numbers

Safety Center officials, airfield managers and wing commanders form a bird hazard working group and meet twice a year to discuss needs, restrictions and operations on airfields, Sullivan said.

He said he has been to more than 120 military installations across the globe, and each varies in habitat, climate and species, as well as the amount of funding devoted to the program. The Federal Aviation Administration also has a wildlife hazard management plan, he added.

The Air Force teams are aware bird migration patterns change by season, warning pilots to be on high alert when taking off or coming in for a landing.

Dyess' 317th Airlift Wing reported 15 bird strikes to its C-130J Super Hercules fleet in April, according to a release.

They also try to avoid times of day when birds are more active, such as sunrise and sunset.

"We request that [pilots] minimize all landing and takeoffs in low-level flight in these migratory pathways," Smith said. "We want to limit the number of flights and time spent low to the ground."

The airmen said analysts shouldn't necessarily look at the numbers, but rather the species of bird.

Ottmo said any bird could be catastrophic to an aircraft depending on where it hits, with engine strikes being particularly dangerous. But a B-1 Lancer bomber may take more damage from hitting two ducks than hitting 19 smaller Starlings.

If a bird strike occurs, airmen take a sample of the bird's remains and send it to the Smithsonian Institution Feather ID Lab for testing, Ottmo said, adding that it helps to identify migratory bird species patterns across the U.S.

"When I get that data back from the Smithsonian and I know what kind of bird was hit … I'm able to better manage the airfield to make it less attractive to that species," May added.

The Fish and Wildlife Service, which has its own migratory bird program, collects the data and passes it to other agencies as requested.
 

Melkein laitoin TA kiväärin puolelle, koska kalibeeri toimii todella pitkällä piipulla (22 tuumaa). Chad on myös kehittänyt oman reseptin ammukselle. TA peruskivääri kalibeerina Valkyyri toimii, en tiedä miten se toimii käytännössä SA tilanteessa, luodin painon ollessa 90 grainisena 556sen ja 762sen NATO latausten välissä. Kuitenkin uutena kalibeerina, voisi ehkä toimia myös uudessa aseessa tukiampujan roolissa.

Ensimmäistä kertaa myös Irakin veteraanit näyttävät 800 yardin 731.52 metrin radan. Kalibeeri on super tarkka pitkällä matkalla.
 
Viimeksi muokattu:
UA4HF4GFG5HMJBJAC2AN7Y666M.jpg


The Russian maker of the AK-47 unveiled a new rifle on August 20 called the AK-308, which it is expected to demonstrate at the Army-2018 Forum on Tuesday.

"The weapon is based on the AK103 submachine gun for the cartridge 7.62x51 mm with elements and components of the AK-12 automatic machine," Kalashnikov Concern said in a press statement on Monday.

"At the moment, preparations are under way for preliminary testing of weapons," Kalashnikov added.
https://www.militarytimes.com/off-d...-that-fires-308-rounds-and-were-not-sure-why/

308 AKn lisäksi Kalasnikov yhtiö ilmoitti tuovansa 200-sarjan markkinoille.
 
If you have not heard of “Q,” frankly, where have you been? They are the company with the BEST named silencers in the firearms industry with options of the Trash Panda, Thunder Chicken and Erector just for some examples. The company who has the mantra of Live Q or Die does not just have extremely witty marketing, they also produce stellar products. Along those same lines of quality, they try to push the industry forward in new, innovative ways constantly. That innovative nature is personified through their “The Fix” rifle and its new caliber of 8.6 Creedmoor kicks it up another notch as well.

We were fortunate enough to steal some time away from the guys over at Q to get the low down on this new 8.6 Creedmoor cartridge. Specifically, we got ahold of Ethan Lessard, Vice President of Engineering. Through an e-mail exchange I was able to ask a few simple, but important questions on the 8.6 Creedmoor to get everyone filled in on this new and fairly mysterious cartridge.
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/08/20/tfb-exclusive-8-6-creedmoor/
 
ARMA.jpg

Modernisoitu FAL. Sopisiko tämä tukiampujalle pääaseeksi?

Argentina’s state owned defence manufacturer Fabricaciones Militares has delivered the first batch of modernised FAL rifles. Nearly 300 of the refurbished FALs have been handed over to the Argentine Army with new railed forends, stocks and top covers.

The FAL has been in Argentine service for decades and is supplemented in service by Steyr AUG and M4 carbine. Back in 2016, it was announced that Fabricaciones Militares would produce the 7.62x51mm Beretta ARX200 under license to begin replacing the venerable FAL in 2020.
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/08/24/argentina-receives-first-modernised-fals/
 
Olen saanut sellaisen käsityksen että FAL ei ole mikään erityisen tarkka ase.

Onko tämä sama asia modernisoidun version kanssa. Jotkut väittävät että perinne FAL on 1.5 ja 3.0 MOA välillä. Luulisin että tuossa projektissa on otettu se huomioon. Tukiampujalla luulisi riittävän 1 MOA.
 
Hieman pohdintaa tästä kaliiberiasiasta. Omasta palvelusajasta on se reilu neljännesvuosisata ja silloinkin pääaseena oli jokin muu kuin RK62. Mutta kyllä sekin jossain määrin tutuksi tuli.

Nyt Herran Vuonna 2018 käytössä on edelleen sama kaliiberi. Ymmärtääkseni maailma taas on suuntautunut pienempiin kaliibereihin ja tätä suuntaa monet täälläkin ovat kannattaneet myös meille. Kuitenkin se, mikä on muuttunut omista ajoista lähtien on henkilökohtainen suojaus. Minun aikanani suojaus käsitti seuraavat tekijät:

1. Sadeviitta (ydinaseiden ja VX/Novichokin torjunta)
2. Mantteli (napalmin ja fosforin/termitiin torjunta)
3. Kypärä. (Vaimolta kysyttäessä turhin väline tässä listassa)
4. Hurjat huhut sirpaleliiveistä/viitoista (edes Utin sankareilla ei tällaisia näkynyt tuohon aikaan)

Nykyään tilanne on toinen. Edes pitkä kiväärinpatruuna ei takaa tulosta uusia suojia vastaan ja kehitys tulee todennäköisesti jatkumaan materiaalien paranemisen ja hintojen laskun kautta samana. Jos nyt ostetaan uusi ase niin oletuksena lienee että sen tulisi olla jossain määrin tehokas ainakin useiden vuosikymmenien ajan. Kysymys kuuluu, ovatko nykyiset kaliiberit tehokkaita tätä kehitystä ajatellen, vai kannattaisiko asiaa miettiä toiselta näkökannalta?

Olen pohtinut kannattaisiko meidän lähteä toiseen suuntaan ja kasvattaa rohkeasti kaliiberia julmasti. Puhun siis vähintään 10-12,7 kaliiberin aseesta jolla olisi patruunakehityksen puolesta valtava kehityspotentiaali (esim, Sabot, räjähtävä jne.) vuosikymmeniksi eteenpäin. Toki tämä tarkoittaisi koko ampumakoulutuksen ja taktisen ajattelun muuttamista poispäin tuliylivoiman ajattelusta takaisin historiaan tähdättyihin yksittäislaukauksiin? Ja toki esim, patruunahuolto ja kulutus muuttuisivat täysin. Mutta toisaalta en näe suurta arvoa kantaa tulevaisuudessa 1000kpl patruunaa joiden ainoa vaikutus olisi siinä että osuma saisi kansanvihollisen nousemaan näreen takaa ja puimaan nyrkkiä valkobandiitin suuntaan sekä uhkailemaan kauhealla kostolla jos hänen uuteen hienoon maastokankaaseensa vielä tehdään yksikin reikä mitä hän joutuu illalla ompelemaan.

Tiedän, että tällaisia aseita ei nykypäivänä käytännössä ole, mutta tässä piilee myös ehkä Suomalaisen aseteollisuuden mahdollisuus. Nykykaliiberien valmistus on niin kilpailtua ettei pieni maa niissä pärjää tuotantomielessä. Mutta täysin uusi ajattelu voi myös avata kaupallisia mahdollisuuksia tulevaisuudessa jos tämä visio toteutuu. Tuollaisen proton kehittäminen ja tuottaminen ei nimittäin maksa maltaita edes Suomen mittakaavassa.

Kuten sanottu, en näistä käsiaseista tiedä juurikaan mitään, mutta tuollaisia ajatuksia on vuosien mittaan herännyt yleensäkin ja tätä palstaa lukiessa.
 
USA hankkii lisää joidenkin mielestä antiikin aikuisia konepistooleja. Oma veikkaus voittajaksi jossain vaiheessa on Sig.
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/09/24/army-confirms-sub-compact-weapon-contracts/
BREAKING: Army Confirms 6 Sub Compact Weapon Contracts
Posted 8 hours ago in Breaking News, Defense, Submachine Guns/Pistol Caliber Carbines by Matthew Moss with 28 Comments

1-660x402.jpg

US Army Confirms SCW Contract Awards
The US Army’s Contracting Command has announced the award of six separate Fixed Priced, Full and Open Competition Prototype OTA’s confirming earlier reports. The successful vendors will now provide the Army with the 10 testing an evaluation weapons needed for the programme’s testing phase.
As earlier reported between the 14th and 17th September, the US Army awarded six companies contracts to provide weapons for testing and evaluation:
Follow the The Firearm Blog Defense Channel

Global Ordnance LLC – Sarasota, FL; OTA award number: W15QKN-18-9-1030 (award 09/17/2018)
Angstadt Arms LLC – Charlotte, NC; OTA award number: W15QKN-18-9-1031 (award 09/14/2018)
B&T USA LLC – Tampa, FL; OTA award number: W15QKN-18-9-1032 (award 09/14/2018)
Shield Arms, LLC – Bigfork, MT; OTA award number: W15QKN-18-9-1033 (award 09/15/2018)
Sig Sauer, Inc. – Newington, NH; OTA award number: W15QKN-18-9-1034 (award 09/17/2018)
Trident Rifles, LLC – Odenton, MD; OTA award number: W15QKN-18-9-1035 (award 09/14/2018)​
The ‘Contract Award Dollar Amount’ have also been posted with each separate contract award notice. The most expensive award came from Shield Arms LLC, with their entry costing $33,350.00, closely followed by SIG Sauer’s at $32,516.80 and Trident Rifles LLC’s costing $31,712.11. There is then a small gap with Angstadt Arms LLC’s contract costing $27,907.00 and B&T USA LLC’s coming in at $27,364.81. The cheapest entry comes from Global Ordnance LLC, which TFB examined last week, with a contract award amount of $19,529.30. This gives the SCW programme cost of approximately $173,000. Substantially cheaper than the $260,000 estimated worth of the earlier abortive SCW RFI cancelled in July.
Army Contracting Command, New Jersey’s, post on FedBizOpps.gov explains that:
These Prototype OTA’s will be for the delivery of functional Sub Compact Weapon (SCW) systems along with accessories and spare parts. The SCW systems will undergo the required Government testing and if successful, a follow-on production OTA or Federal Acquisition Regulation based contract award, may be made to one offeror for up to 350 SCW systems, which will include an option for additional quantities up to 1,000 SCW systems that may be exercised in quantities no greater than 350 SCW systems. The expected Prototype OTA duration is six months after award.​
The successful vendors now have 30 days to provide the Army with the first 10 SCWs for testing. Once the testing is completed and a follow on production contract has been awarded the remaining 340 weapons are required to be delivered in a 5 to 7 month period.
 
USA hankkii lisää joidenkin mielestä antiikin aikuisia konepistooleja. Oma veikkaus voittajaksi jossain vaiheessa on Sig.
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/09/24/army-confirms-sub-compact-weapon-contracts/

Pitäisikö tuo tulkita, että myöhemmin saattaa tulla vielä lisää ehdokkaita? Meinaan lähinnä, että eikös MP-7:n pitäisi olla aika sopiva tuohon, ellei patruunaksi ole valittu nimenomaan 9 millistä? Kävi myös mielessä sellainenkin, että voisiko jenkeillä olla jo valmiiksi MP-7:ja joten heidän ei tarvitse hankkia testeihin?
 
Pitäisikö tuo tulkita, että myöhemmin saattaa tulla vielä lisää ehdokkaita? Meinaan lähinnä, että eikös MP-7:n pitäisi olla aika sopiva tuohon, ellei patruunaksi ole valittu nimenomaan 9 millistä? Kävi myös mielessä sellainenkin, että voisiko jenkeillä olla jo valmiiksi MP-7:ja joten heidän ei tarvitse hankkia testeihin?
9mm haussa. Alunperin noita oli jotain 16kpl testeissä, esim HK ja FN tuotteet karsiutui pois.
 
  • Tykkää
Reactions: ctg
Erikoista että legendaarinen MP5 ei ole mahtunut mukaan kun haetaan 9mm KP:ta.
Mutta mista sitä tietää mitä haetaan ja onhan se yllätys, että ylipäätään hakevat 9mm KP:ta.
 
Erikoista että legendaarinen MP5 ei ole mahtunut mukaan kun haetaan 9mm KP:ta.
Mutta mista sitä tietää mitä haetaan ja onhan se yllätys, että ylipäätään hakevat 9mm KP:ta.
Olet ihan oikeassa, MP5 on legendaarinen vehje. Mutta huolimatta että MP5 on ikoninen laite ja tuttu Die Hard 1:stä kuin muistakin länsimaisen kulttuurimme virstanpylväistä niin on hyvä muistaa että se esiteltiin 1963. Vaikka se oli aikanaan todella loistava ja aikaansa edellä, on moni asia ajanut jo ohitse. Omasta mielestäni yksi MP5 pahimpia piirteitä on häiriönpoisto, sillä kun se menee jumiin tulee äkkiä sivuaseelle kiirus. Materiaalienkin suhteen on mahdollista tänä päivänä rakentaa paljon kevyempi ja ergonomisempi ase. Itse ammun jonkin verran MP5:lla ja Micro Ronilla (molemmat TT3) ja ainakin tuohon perinteisen mittaiseen (ei siis lyhyeen MP5K:n) MP5:een verrattuna itse pidän paljon enemmän lyhyen etäisyyden touhuissa Micro Ronista ennen kaikkea keveyden, tasapainoisuuden ja ergonomian suhteen (tukki/tähtäinlinja/kahva yms istuu paljon paremmin nopeaan symmetriseen ampuma-asentoon) vaikka kyseessä on vain tuollainen konversiokitti vs real thing. Lisäksi tuon kokoluokan aseissa taittoperäisyys, käyttäjälle kätisyyden vaihdot yms parantavat käytettävyyttä joukoilla verrattuna MP5:een moderneimmissa aseissa. MP5 on edelleen ihan hyvä laite mutta vähän kuin AK, se nyt vaan alkaa olee aikansa elänyt konstruktio. Mainittakoon että käyttämäni MP5 edustaa 2000 luvun alun aseita, ihan viimeisimpiä versioita en ole ampunut kuin pari vuotta vanhalla MP5K:lla joka ei ollut huono muttei mielestäni mitenkään erityisen hyväkään. Tuossa omia mietteitä oman käytön pohjalta, varmaan joku kokee asian toisinkin.
 
Back
Top