Blogi, joten ota se sellaisena.
Epidemiat maailmalla
- Viestiketjun aloittaja Tvälups
- Aloitus PVM
Tyksissä hoidossa nuoria potilaita jotka saaneet toisesta piikistä erikoisia oireita. Yhdeltä lähtenyt kuulo toisesta korvasta ja useampi saanut näköhäiriöitä.
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Onko sulla millainen tietolähde?
Kävin maanantaina yksityisellä lääkäriasemalla. Otin aiheeksi rokotukset.
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Sattuipa tässä silmään meta-analyysi covid-19 -rokotteiden turvallisuudesta jopa erityyppisistä sellaisista, tuoreehko eli julk. 28.7.2021:
Ja sen mukaan mRNA-rokotteet on ylivoimaisesti haitallisimpia lähes (poislukien "virus-like particle") kaikkiin muihin covid-19 -rokotetyyppeihin verrattuna. Vaikka lausuit että niiden toimintaperiaate on huomattavasti turvallisempi kuin perinteisten rokotteiden???
Meta-analyysin näkemys on että lyhytaikaisen tarkastelun perusteella turvallisuustaso rokotteilla on "hyväksyttävä", mutta pitkäaikaista tulee tieten seurata.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315897/
Evaluation of the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines: a rapid review
"ResultsA total of 87 publications with safety data from clinical trials and post-authorization studies of 19 COVID-19 vaccines on 6 different platforms were included. The pooled rates of local and systemic reactions were significantly lower among inactivated vaccines (23.7%, 21.0%), protein subunit vaccines (33.0%, 22.3%), and DNA vaccines (39.5%, 29.3%), compared to RNA vaccines (89.4%, 83.3%), non-replicating vector vaccines (55.9%, 66.3%), and virus-like particle vaccines (100.0%, 78.9%). Solicited injection-site pain was the most common local reactions, and fatigue and headache were the most common systemic reactions. The frequency of vaccine-related serious adverse events was low (< 0.1%) and balanced between treatment groups. Vaccine platforms and age groups of vaccine recipients accounted for much of the heterogeneity in safety profiles between COVID-19 vaccines. Reporting rates of adverse events from post-authorization observational studies were similar to results from clinical trials. Crude reporting rates of adverse events from post-authorization safety monitoring (passive surveillance) were lower than in clinical trials and varied between countries."
"Age subgroup analysis based on data from clinical trials
The rate of the most common solicited symptoms was significantly higher among younger adults compared to the elderly (Additional file 1: Table S11). RNA vaccines had significantly higher rate of most common solicited reactions (e.g., injection-site pain, fatigue, headache) among younger adults compared to the other 5 platforms, regardless of the grades of adverse reactions (except overall injection-site pain which was also quite high for virus-like particle vaccines) (Additional file 1: Figures S4-S6). Meanwhile, the highest risk of these common systemic reactions (including fever) was observed in RNA vaccine recipients in this age group, compared to controls (Additional file 1: Table S12). While the highest rate of fever was shown in virus-like particle vaccines (Additional file 1: Figure S7). Differences between vaccine platforms and age groups of vaccine recipients accounted for much of the heterogeneity in safety profiles between COVID-19 vaccines (Additional file 1: Table S13). In addition, the rate of AEFI after CoronaVac was less frequent in children and adolescents than in younger adults, whereas the reverse was found with BNT162b2 (Additional file 1: Table S7)."
Tuon jälkimmäisen kappaleen perusteella nuoret aikuiset ottavat hittiä erityisesti RNA-rokotteista ja viimeisen virkkeen perusteella Comirnarty (BNT162b2) on lasten ja nuorten kohdalla erityisen paska eli enemmän haittavaikutuksia kuin nuorilla aikuisilla jopa.
P.S: Table 3:sta ilmenee että ainakin haittailmoitusten määrällä suhteessa annettuhin pistoksiin kiinalaisten koronarokote (Sinopharm, käytössä mm. Argentiinassa) on ihan ylivoimainen turvallisuudeltaan meidän länkkäreiden tai Sputnikin vastaavaan verrattuna. Toimintaperiaate käsittääkseni heikennetty virus ja ilmoitettu välitön teho vakavaa sairautta vastaan heikompi kuin Comirnartyllä.
Meta-analyysin tekijöiden nimet oli toki aika lailla wing-wong -painotteisia.
Viimeksi muokattu:
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/indias-ivermectin-blackout
Friday, Aug 13, 2021 - 11:10 PM
Authored by Justus R Hope, MD. via TheDesertReview.com,
Yet, for some reason, we are not allowed to talk about it. Thus, for example, Wikipedia cannot mention the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie or Dr. Pierre Kory published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.
Wikipedia is not allowed to publish the recent meta-analysis on Ivermectin authored by Dr. Andrew Hill.
Furthermore, it is not allowed to say anything concerning www.ivmmeta.com showing the 61 studies comprising 23,000 patients which reveal up to a 96% reduction in death [prophylaxis] with Ivermectin.
One can see the bias in Wikipedia by going on the "talk" pages for each subject and reading about the fierce attempts of editors to add these facts and the stone wall refusals by the "senior" editors who have an agenda. And that agenda is not loyalty to your health.
The easy way to read the “talk” page on any Wikipedia subject is to click the top left “talk” button. Anyone can then review the editors’ discussions.
There is a blackout on any conversation about how Ivermectin beat COVID-19 in India. When I discussed the dire straits that India found itself in early this year with 414,000 cases per day, and over 4,000 deaths per day, and how that evaporated within five weeks of the addition of Ivermectin, I am often asked, "But why is there no mention of that in the news?"
Yes, exactly. Ask yourself why India’s success against the Delta variant with Ivermectin is such a closely guarded secret by the NIH and CDC. Second, ask yourself why no major media outlets reported this fact, but instead, tried to confuse you with false information by saying the deaths in India are 10 times greater than official reports.
India's Ivermectin Blackout
by Tyler DurdenFriday, Aug 13, 2021 - 11:10 PM
Authored by Justus R Hope, MD. via TheDesertReview.com,
Ivermectin Wins in India
News of India's defeat of the Delta variant should be common knowledge. It is just about as obvious as the nose on one's face. It is so clear when one looks at the graphs that no one can deny it.Yet, for some reason, we are not allowed to talk about it. Thus, for example, Wikipedia cannot mention the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie or Dr. Pierre Kory published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.
Wikipedia is not allowed to publish the recent meta-analysis on Ivermectin authored by Dr. Andrew Hill.
Furthermore, it is not allowed to say anything concerning www.ivmmeta.com showing the 61 studies comprising 23,000 patients which reveal up to a 96% reduction in death [prophylaxis] with Ivermectin.
One can see the bias in Wikipedia by going on the "talk" pages for each subject and reading about the fierce attempts of editors to add these facts and the stone wall refusals by the "senior" editors who have an agenda. And that agenda is not loyalty to your health.
The easy way to read the “talk” page on any Wikipedia subject is to click the top left “talk” button. Anyone can then review the editors’ discussions.
There is a blackout on any conversation about how Ivermectin beat COVID-19 in India. When I discussed the dire straits that India found itself in early this year with 414,000 cases per day, and over 4,000 deaths per day, and how that evaporated within five weeks of the addition of Ivermectin, I am often asked, "But why is there no mention of that in the news?"
Yes, exactly. Ask yourself why India’s success against the Delta variant with Ivermectin is such a closely guarded secret by the NIH and CDC. Second, ask yourself why no major media outlets reported this fact, but instead, tried to confuse you with false information by saying the deaths in India are 10 times greater than official reports.
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34145166/
Meta-Analysis
Am J Ther. 2021 Jun 21;28(4):e434-e460.
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines
"Therapeutic advances: Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence). This result was confirmed in a trial sequential analysis using the same DerSimonian-Laird method that underpinned the unadjusted analysis. This was also robust against a trial sequential analysis using the Biggerstaff-Tweedie method. Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%-91%). Secondary outcomes provided less certain evidence. Low-certainty evidence suggested that there may be no benefit with ivermectin for "need for mechanical ventilation," whereas effect estimates for "improvement" and "deterioration" clearly favored ivermectin use. Severe adverse events were rare among treatment trials and evidence of no difference was assessed as low certainty. Evidence on other secondary outcomes was very low certainty.
Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally."
------
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/
Am J Ther. 2021 May-Jun; 28(3): e299–e318
Published online 2021 Apr 22.
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
"Therapeutic Advances:
A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified."
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
JATKUVASTI PÄIVITTYVÄ IVERMEKTIININ TEHOA COVID-19 HOIDOSSA ARVIOIVA META-ANALYYSISIVUSTO
https://ivmmeta.com/
--------
Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 63 studies
Covid Analysis, Sep 9, 2021, Version 117 — discussion updates (V1 Nov 26, 2020) [GMK response, Elgazzar, Carvallo]
•Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 69% [54‑79%] and 86% [75‑92%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and restriction to peer-reviewed studies or Randomized Controlled Trials.
•Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. 29 studies show statistically significant improvements in isolation.
•There is evidence of a negative publication bias, and the probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 63 studies is estimated to be 1 in 1 trillion.
•While many treatments have some level of efficacy, they do not replace vaccines and other measures to avoid infection. Only 27% of ivermectin studies show zero events in the treatment arm.
•Elimination of COVID-19 is a race against viral evolution. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used. Those denying the efficacy of treatments share responsibility for the increased risk of COVID-19 becoming endemic; and the increased mortality, morbidity, and collateral damage.
•The evidence base is much larger and has much lower conflict of interest than typically used to approve drugs.
•All data to reproduce this paper and sources are in the appendix. See [Bryant, Hariyanto, Kory, Lawrie, Nardelli] for other meta analyses with similar results confirming efficacy.
00.250.50.7511.251.51.752+Kory et al.69%0.31 [0.20-0.47]Improvement, RR [CI]Bryant et al.62%0.38 [0.19-0.73]Lawrie et al.83%0.17 [0.08-0.35]Nardelli et al.79%0.21 [0.11-0.36]Hariyanto et al.69%0.31 [0.15-0.62]WHO (OR)81%0.19 [0.09-0.36]ivmmeta58%0.42 [0.30-0.59]Ivermectin meta analysis mortality resultsivmmeta.com Sep 9, 2021Lower Risk
https://ivmmeta.com/
--------
Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 63 studies
Covid Analysis, Sep 9, 2021, Version 117 — discussion updates (V1 Nov 26, 2020) [GMK response, Elgazzar, Carvallo]
•Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 69% [54‑79%] and 86% [75‑92%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and restriction to peer-reviewed studies or Randomized Controlled Trials.
•Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. 29 studies show statistically significant improvements in isolation.
| Studies | Prophylaxis | Early treatment | Late treatment | Patients | Authors | |
| All studies | 63 | 86% [75‑92%] | 69% [54‑79%] | 40% [24‑52%] | 26,422 | 613 |
| Peer-reviewed | 44 | 86% [73‑92%] | 70% [52‑81%] | 43% [21‑59%] | 17,082 | 479 |
| Randomized Controlled Trials | 31 | 84% [25‑96%] | 64% [48‑74%] | 30% [2‑50%] | 6,561 | 359 |
| Percentage improvement with ivermectin treatment |
•While many treatments have some level of efficacy, they do not replace vaccines and other measures to avoid infection. Only 27% of ivermectin studies show zero events in the treatment arm.
•Elimination of COVID-19 is a race against viral evolution. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used. Those denying the efficacy of treatments share responsibility for the increased risk of COVID-19 becoming endemic; and the increased mortality, morbidity, and collateral damage.
•The evidence base is much larger and has much lower conflict of interest than typically used to approve drugs.
•All data to reproduce this paper and sources are in the appendix. See [Bryant, Hariyanto, Kory, Lawrie, Nardelli] for other meta analyses with similar results confirming efficacy.
00.250.50.7511.251.51.752+Kory et al.69%0.31 [0.20-0.47]Improvement, RR [CI]Bryant et al.62%0.38 [0.19-0.73]Lawrie et al.83%0.17 [0.08-0.35]Nardelli et al.79%0.21 [0.11-0.36]Hariyanto et al.69%0.31 [0.15-0.62]WHO (OR)81%0.19 [0.09-0.36]ivmmeta58%0.42 [0.30-0.59]Ivermectin meta analysis mortality resultsivmmeta.com Sep 9, 2021Lower Risk
| Evidence base used for other COVID-19 approvals | |||
| Medication | Studies | Patients | Improvement |
| Budesonide (UK) | 1 | 1,779 | 17% |
| Remdesivir (USA) | 1 | 1,063 | 31% |
| Casiri/imdevimab (USA) | 1 | 799 | 66% |
| Ivermectin evidence | 63 | 26,398 | 67% [59‑74%] |
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Tämä lienee valeuutinen. Lääkärillä ollut rikkaamman tarinankerronnan päivä.
Lääkäri järkyttyi: Matolääkettä ei tule käyttää koronan hoitoon | Verkkouutiset
Ihmiset ovat joutuneet Yhdysvalloissa ensiapuun lääkkeen yliannostuksen vuoksi.www.verkkouutiset.fi
---
Rolling Stone ei ole pystynyt vahvistamaan juttua. Lääkäri lienee kuitenkin olemassa, ja levitellyt juttua ympäri maailman tiedotusvälineitä.
One Hospital Denies Oklahoma Doctor's Story of Ivermectin Overdoses Causing ER Delays for Gunshot Victims
The hospital says it hasn't experienced any care backlog due to patients overdosing on a drug that's been falsely peddled as a covid curewww.rollingstone.com
Tämä vahvistaa että tuo ivermektiinimyrkytysjuttu on täyttä potaskaa.
https://www.thedesertreview.com/opi...cle_19b8f2a6-0f29-11ec-94c1-4725bf4978c6.html
"Rolling Stone was forced to publish a retraction of sorts, a correction to their report, wherein they stated the truth of the matter was the opposite. Northeastern Hospital System Sequoyah informed them that Dr. Jason McElyea, although affiliated with them, had not worked in the Sallisaw location in the last two months.
Furthermore, in a statement issued September 5, 2021, Northeastern Hospital System Sequoyah reported that no patients had been treated for Ivermectin overdose. Indeed no patients were treated for any complications of taking Ivermectin - and no gunshot wound patients or otherwise had been turned away from seeking emergency care.
It was all untrue. We were all lied to."
"The fact that Ivermectin is so much SAFER than over-the-counter Tylenol should make you wonder exactly why these articles made the news. The reason is simple. Pfizer and Merck are getting ready to launch expensive new anti-viral pills that can provide early outpatient treatment for COVID-19 and perhaps even be used preventatively. Yet Ivermectin remains effective, cheap, and safe and thus poses a HUGE threat to their profits."
ILoveEU
Kenraali
Tuolla jossain, ohimennen kuulin väitteen, että sen takia nämä h.k.kiniinit ja ivermektiinit on ongelma nykytilanteessa, koska rokotetta jaellaan poikkeuslain perusteella, missä määritellään ettei muuta tehokasta hoitoa saa olla olemassa.
Jos olisi muu tehokas hoito, niin rokote joutuisi käymään läpi perusteellisemman reitin (aikaa vievän), jossa turvallisuus perusteellisesti varmistettaisiin.
En ole vaktatarkistanut, joten voi olla myös väärin. Onko tuolla nyt merkitystäkään, kun muuallakaan ei kovin vahvasti mene:
Tässähön oli mediamylläkkä, kun Joe Rogan otti koronatautiinsa Ivermektiinia. Oli lääkärin määräämä, mutta median toimittajia ja satunnaisia asiantuntijoita myöten se oli väärin tehty. Hyvin jännä ilmiö sinänsä, kun lääkärien pitäisi ottaa lääkkeitä määrätessään, tämä poliittinen ilmasto huomioon.
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Tähän tulee tietenkin suhtautua varauksella, mutta kun tässä on MSM:ssakin raportoitu Japanista löytyneen metallisia partikkeleita kokonaisesta mRNA-rokote-erästä, niin Euroopassa espanjalaisessa Almerian yliopistossa löydettiin sitten viitteitä grafeenista / grafeenioksidista Pfizerin Comirnartystä (vain 1 pullo alustavasti analysoitu).
Tämän tekee vakavammin otettavaksi se, että tekijänä oleva professori Pablo Cambra Madrid on siinä ihan omalla nimellään:
https://es.linkedin.com/in/prof-dr-pablo-campra-madrid-9350b458
Ja häneltä tämän alustavan analyysin oli tilannut Ricardo Delgado Martín eli La Quinta Columna -blogia pitävä herra. Jolla näyttää ainakin omien sanojensa mukaan olevan tutkintoja vähän joka toisesta oppiaineesta, mutta painottuu biostatistiikkaan. https://www.laquintacolumna.net/
Epävirallinen englanninkielinen käännös ohessa, (koetin tuota varmistuslinkkiäkin niin se sanoi että kyllä hra Pablo Campra Madrid on analysoinut Pfizerin mRNA-rokotetta jne. jne.): https://www.docdroid.net/Ov1M99x/official-interim-report-in-english-university-of-almeria-pdf
Googlaamalla löytyy sitten heti faktantarkastajien lausuntoja jotka kertoo että kyllä tuo prof. teki tuon analyysin mutta ei se mitään merkkaa, pullokin tuli lähettipalvelun välityksellä ja Almerian yliopisto ei halua liittyä lausuntoon millään tavalla ja kun kerta Pfizer sanoo ettei siinä ole grafeenia niin ei siinä voi olla jne. jne:
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-grapheneoxide-vaccine-idUSL1N2OZ14F
Sanomattakin on selvää että tästä jutusta hieman MSM:stä irti olevat infolähteet on hyppineet seinille, mutta jutut on siellä jo niin hurjia etten viitsi linkkejä laittaa. Mutta on siellä lähteneet tekemään tohtoristason ihmiset kalliilla koneilla sitä kaivattua lisätutkimusta eri mRNA-rokotteista ja sieltä kuulemma löytyy tätä grafeenia ja sitten myös sitä Japanissa löydettyä ruostumatonta terästäkin, mutta ei toki Pfizerin mRNA-rokotteesta.
Jokainen ottakoon noihin tietolähteisiin oman kantansa, jopa vanhan salaliittoteoreetikon on noita vaikea sulatella.
Tämän tekee vakavammin otettavaksi se, että tekijänä oleva professori Pablo Cambra Madrid on siinä ihan omalla nimellään:
https://es.linkedin.com/in/prof-dr-pablo-campra-madrid-9350b458
Ja häneltä tämän alustavan analyysin oli tilannut Ricardo Delgado Martín eli La Quinta Columna -blogia pitävä herra. Jolla näyttää ainakin omien sanojensa mukaan olevan tutkintoja vähän joka toisesta oppiaineesta, mutta painottuu biostatistiikkaan. https://www.laquintacolumna.net/
Epävirallinen englanninkielinen käännös ohessa, (koetin tuota varmistuslinkkiäkin niin se sanoi että kyllä hra Pablo Campra Madrid on analysoinut Pfizerin mRNA-rokotetta jne. jne.): https://www.docdroid.net/Ov1M99x/official-interim-report-in-english-university-of-almeria-pdf
Googlaamalla löytyy sitten heti faktantarkastajien lausuntoja jotka kertoo että kyllä tuo prof. teki tuon analyysin mutta ei se mitään merkkaa, pullokin tuli lähettipalvelun välityksellä ja Almerian yliopisto ei halua liittyä lausuntoon millään tavalla ja kun kerta Pfizer sanoo ettei siinä ole grafeenia niin ei siinä voi olla jne. jne:
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-grapheneoxide-vaccine-idUSL1N2OZ14F
Sanomattakin on selvää että tästä jutusta hieman MSM:stä irti olevat infolähteet on hyppineet seinille, mutta jutut on siellä jo niin hurjia etten viitsi linkkejä laittaa. Mutta on siellä lähteneet tekemään tohtoristason ihmiset kalliilla koneilla sitä kaivattua lisätutkimusta eri mRNA-rokotteista ja sieltä kuulemma löytyy tätä grafeenia ja sitten myös sitä Japanissa löydettyä ruostumatonta terästäkin, mutta ei toki Pfizerin mRNA-rokotteesta.
Jokainen ottakoon noihin tietolähteisiin oman kantansa, jopa vanhan salaliittoteoreetikon on noita vaikea sulatella.
Viimeksi muokattu:
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Tähän sitten viitataan että Shanghai National Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology Co Ltd on hakenut 27.9.2020 patenttia grafeenioksidin käytöstä rokotteen vaikuttavien aineiden vakaana alustana. Siis jonka alustan "selässä" vaikuttavat aineet kulkeutuvat kehossa sinne minne kai pitääkin:
https://patents.google.com/patent/CN112220919A/en
Nano coronavirus recombinant vaccine taking graphene oxide as carrier
Abstract
The invention belongs to the field of nano materials and biomedicine, and relates to a vaccine, in particular to development of 2019-nCoV coronavirus nuclear recombinant nano vaccine. The invention also comprises a preparation method of the vaccine and application of the vaccine in animal experiments. The new corona vaccine contains graphene oxide, carnosine, CpG and new corona virus RBD; binding carnosine, CpG and neocoronavirus RBD on the backbone of graphene oxide; the CpG coding sequence is shown as SEQ ID NO 1; the novel coronavirus RBD refers to a novel coronavirus protein receptor binding region which can generate a high-titer specific antibody aiming at the RBD in a mouse body, and provides a strong support for prevention and treatment of the novel coronavirus.
...
"Graphene is a two-dimensional carbon nanomaterial consisting of carbon atoms in sp hybridized orbitals in a hexagonal honeycomb lattice. The basic structural unit of the material is the most stable benzene six-membered ring in the organic material, and the material is the most ideal two-dimensional material at present. Graphene Oxide (GO) is a Graphene oxide derivative, and is a exfoliated product. Due to the characteristics of unique SP2 hybridization, a perfect two-dimensional structure and high reactivity of the edge, the treatment platform based on the hybrid structure can be used as an ideal load and grafting carrier in design and development, and plays an important role in aspects of nano-drug delivery systems, biological detection, tumor treatment, cell imaging and the like."
-------
Ja magnetisoitu (reduced) grafeenioksidi on monikäyttöinen aine:
Magnetic properties of graphene oxide functionalized with “Au” and “Fe2O3” nanoparticles: A comparative study
Author links open overlay panelDavid O.IdisiJames A.OkeEvan M.BenechaSabato J.MoloiSekhar C.Rayhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.869Get rights and content
Abstract
Reduced graphene oxide (r-GO) nanocomposites are very useful for different applications such as magnetic storage media and bio-imaging/biomedical applications and recently have been found to be very useful in electronic and magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent where r-GO was functionalized with silica coated gold and iron oxide nanoparticles. The potential material for these different applications was established by experimental data where the microstructural, electronic, electrical and magnetic properties were studied.
Viimeksi muokattu:
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Reutersin uutinen 28.8.2021 kertoo, että Japani on keskeyttänyt Modernan mRNA-rokotukset:
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/08/28/national/japan-moderna-vaccine-deaths/
"Japan halted the use of 1.63 million Moderna doses shipped to 863 vaccination centers nationwide, more than a week after the domestic distributor, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, received reports of contaminants in some vials."
"As of Aug. 8, 991 people had died in Japan after receiving shots of Pfizer Inc.’s vaccine and 11 after receiving Moderna’s, but no causality between the injections and the deaths has been established, according to the health ministry."
----
Japanin pääministeri Abe:n täysin yllättävä eroamisilmoitus 28.8.2021:
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/08/28/national/politics-diplomacy/shinzo-abe-resign/
"Reporters, lawmakers, Cabinet ministers and staff at the Prime Minister’s Office are all in close daily communication, but none of them seemed to know Abe’s resignation was coming.
When the first report of his intention to resign emerged shortly after 2 p.m., reporters at the Prime Minister’s Office rushed to a television screen set up in a corner booth by the entrance. Camera crews hurriedly set up their equipment, and journalists frantically made phone calls to sources to confirm the news.
“I learned about his resignation on a news report and I am surprised,” said Seiko Hashimoto, the minister in charge of the Olympics."
-----
29.8.2021:
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2...e-health/japan-moderna-vaccine-contamination/
Mutta kun Abe on nyt mennyt, rokottaminen jatkuu ja 3. piikkiä suunnitellaan.
-----
Reuters kumoaa 8.6.2021 faktatarkastuksessaan perusteettomat huhut, että 4 presidenttiä, jotka vastustivat covid-19 -rokottamista Afrikassa, olisivat yllättäen kuolleet. Tai siis että heidän yllättävät kuolemansa voisivat mitenkään liittyä siihen, että vastustivat koronarokotuksia.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-africa-leaders-idUSL2N2NP2SW
"COVID SCEPTIC MAGUFULI DIED OF A HEART CONDITION
Magufuli’s death, at the age of 61, was announced on March 17, 2021 by Samia Suluhu Hassan, who was vice president at the time and is now president of Tanzania, here ." [Magufulin käskystä otettiin PCR-näytteitä mm. eläimistä ja moottoriöljystä ja vietiin ne WHO:n maahan tulleille koronatestaajille. Kun niistä tuli positiivisia tuloksia Magufuli pyysi testaajia pakkaamaan kimpsunsa ja kampsunsa. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Magufuli ]
"On Jan. 4, just under a month after Dlamini's death, authorities expressed their intention to vaccinate the entire population against COVID-19, using initiatives such as COVAX ( here ).
There is no evidence that Dlamini was assassinated."
"Nkurunziza, a former soccer player, had not imposed restrictions in the country, and allowed big sports events and political demonstrations to continue. According to The Guardian, Burundi authorities were accused of deliberately downplaying the threat of the coronavirus pandemic."
Luonnollisesti useimpien näiden kuolemien jälkeen levitettiin huhuja että he olisivat nimenomaan kuolleet koronaan. Ne jotka luulevat, että joidenkin näiden presidenttien mahdollinen kuolema voisi (todennäköisesti) johtua koronasta, kehotan tutustumaan uudestaan uuden koronaviruksen kuolleisuustasoon. Yhdistettynä presidenttitasoiseen hoitoon.
------
Kun viides koronarokotuksia vastustava valtionpäämies kuolee yllättäen (Haitin presidentti murhataan 7.7.2021) Reuters tekee uuden faktan tarkastuksen 22.7.2021 ja toteaa, että nämä kuolemat ei mitenkään liity siihen, että he vastustivat koronarokotuksia:
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-africa-leaderscovid-idUSL1N2OY23Y
"Following the assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moise on July 7, a new meme circulating on social media presents the unfounded claim that he and four other leaders, who also died while in office, were killed for opposing COVID-19 vaccines.
Reuters reported that the Haitian leader was shot dead in his home on July 7 by heavily armed assassins ( here ). Police said they had arrested one of the suspected masterminds in the assassination who was accused of hiring mercenaries to oust and replace Moise ( here ).
While the government of the Caribbean country had expressed hesitancy to receiving the Oxford/AstraZeneca shot specifically ( here , here ), Haiti had not refuse vaccine outright.
By Feb. 3 ( here ), the COVAX distribution scheme had allocated 876,000 vaccine doses to reach Haiti, but this was delayed due to manufacturing issues in India ( here ).
On July 14, the Caribbean country received its first 500,000 doses of COVID-19 donated by the U.S. government through the COVAX vaccine distribution scheme ( here ), regional health officials said ( here ). On July 16, the country started its vaccination campaign, according to the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) here ."
-----
Eli 7 päivää Haitin presidentin laittamisesta kylmäksi lennätettiin ekat 500 000 covid-19 rokoteannosta Haitiin.
Jotenkin tulee Reutersin faktantarkastusosastosta mieleen, että nehän ihan vittuilevat suoraan ihmisille. Ja nauravat.
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/08/28/national/japan-moderna-vaccine-deaths/
"Japan halted the use of 1.63 million Moderna doses shipped to 863 vaccination centers nationwide, more than a week after the domestic distributor, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, received reports of contaminants in some vials."
"As of Aug. 8, 991 people had died in Japan after receiving shots of Pfizer Inc.’s vaccine and 11 after receiving Moderna’s, but no causality between the injections and the deaths has been established, according to the health ministry."
----
Japanin pääministeri Abe:n täysin yllättävä eroamisilmoitus 28.8.2021:
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/08/28/national/politics-diplomacy/shinzo-abe-resign/
"Reporters, lawmakers, Cabinet ministers and staff at the Prime Minister’s Office are all in close daily communication, but none of them seemed to know Abe’s resignation was coming.
When the first report of his intention to resign emerged shortly after 2 p.m., reporters at the Prime Minister’s Office rushed to a television screen set up in a corner booth by the entrance. Camera crews hurriedly set up their equipment, and journalists frantically made phone calls to sources to confirm the news.
“I learned about his resignation on a news report and I am surprised,” said Seiko Hashimoto, the minister in charge of the Olympics."
-----
29.8.2021:
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2...e-health/japan-moderna-vaccine-contamination/
Japan detects more Moderna vaccine contamination
-----Mutta kun Abe on nyt mennyt, rokottaminen jatkuu ja 3. piikkiä suunnitellaan.
-----
Reuters kumoaa 8.6.2021 faktatarkastuksessaan perusteettomat huhut, että 4 presidenttiä, jotka vastustivat covid-19 -rokottamista Afrikassa, olisivat yllättäen kuolleet. Tai siis että heidän yllättävät kuolemansa voisivat mitenkään liittyä siihen, että vastustivat koronarokotuksia.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-africa-leaders-idUSL2N2NP2SW
"COVID SCEPTIC MAGUFULI DIED OF A HEART CONDITION
Magufuli’s death, at the age of 61, was announced on March 17, 2021 by Samia Suluhu Hassan, who was vice president at the time and is now president of Tanzania, here ." [Magufulin käskystä otettiin PCR-näytteitä mm. eläimistä ja moottoriöljystä ja vietiin ne WHO:n maahan tulleille koronatestaajille. Kun niistä tuli positiivisia tuloksia Magufuli pyysi testaajia pakkaamaan kimpsunsa ja kampsunsa. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Magufuli ]
"On Jan. 4, just under a month after Dlamini's death, authorities expressed their intention to vaccinate the entire population against COVID-19, using initiatives such as COVAX ( here ).
There is no evidence that Dlamini was assassinated."
"Nkurunziza, a former soccer player, had not imposed restrictions in the country, and allowed big sports events and political demonstrations to continue. According to The Guardian, Burundi authorities were accused of deliberately downplaying the threat of the coronavirus pandemic."
Luonnollisesti useimpien näiden kuolemien jälkeen levitettiin huhuja että he olisivat nimenomaan kuolleet koronaan. Ne jotka luulevat, että joidenkin näiden presidenttien mahdollinen kuolema voisi (todennäköisesti) johtua koronasta, kehotan tutustumaan uudestaan uuden koronaviruksen kuolleisuustasoon. Yhdistettynä presidenttitasoiseen hoitoon.
------
Kun viides koronarokotuksia vastustava valtionpäämies kuolee yllättäen (Haitin presidentti murhataan 7.7.2021) Reuters tekee uuden faktan tarkastuksen 22.7.2021 ja toteaa, että nämä kuolemat ei mitenkään liity siihen, että he vastustivat koronarokotuksia:
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-africa-leaderscovid-idUSL1N2OY23Y
"Following the assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moise on July 7, a new meme circulating on social media presents the unfounded claim that he and four other leaders, who also died while in office, were killed for opposing COVID-19 vaccines.
Reuters reported that the Haitian leader was shot dead in his home on July 7 by heavily armed assassins ( here ). Police said they had arrested one of the suspected masterminds in the assassination who was accused of hiring mercenaries to oust and replace Moise ( here ).
While the government of the Caribbean country had expressed hesitancy to receiving the Oxford/AstraZeneca shot specifically ( here , here ), Haiti had not refuse vaccine outright.
By Feb. 3 ( here ), the COVAX distribution scheme had allocated 876,000 vaccine doses to reach Haiti, but this was delayed due to manufacturing issues in India ( here ).
On July 14, the Caribbean country received its first 500,000 doses of COVID-19 donated by the U.S. government through the COVAX vaccine distribution scheme ( here ), regional health officials said ( here ). On July 16, the country started its vaccination campaign, according to the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) here ."
-----
Eli 7 päivää Haitin presidentin laittamisesta kylmäksi lennätettiin ekat 500 000 covid-19 rokoteannosta Haitiin.
Jotenkin tulee Reutersin faktantarkastusosastosta mieleen, että nehän ihan vittuilevat suoraan ihmisille. Ja nauravat.
Viimeksi muokattu:
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Tähän Hall of Fame:en tulee potentiaalisena kandidaattina lisätä Madagaskarin presidentti Andry Rajoelina, joka murhayrityksestä huolimatta promoaa edelleen maan itse kehittämää yrttijuomaa koronalääkkeeksi, jossa uutteena malarialääkkeessä käytettyä kasvia. Vieläpä tarjoilee sitä muillekin Afrikan maille. Myös presidentin lähin mies koitettiin laittaa kylmäksi, mutta sekään ei oikein onnistunut.
Mutta yrittänyttä ei laiteta!
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-53756752
https://www.france24.com/en/africa/...e-arrested-over-foiled-plot-to-kill-president
Opetelkaa hyvät ihmiset laittamaan se maski oikein.
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Reutersin faktantarkastus on todella mielenkiintoinen lähde. Tätä La Quinta Columna:n löydösten popularisointia (by Pete Stew) faktatarkastellessaan he totesivat, ettei tämä tämän vuoden keväällä julkistettu artikkeli tarkoita mitään, koska siinä kuvattua pelkistetyn grafeenioksidin käyttöä rokotteen vaikuttavien aineiden kuljettajana ja adjuvanttina on artikkelin mukaan vasta kokeiltu eläimillä. Nopealla vilkaisulla aiemmin oltiin tiedemaailmassa sitä mieltä, että grafeenioksidi ihmisen verenkiertoon päästessään tuhoaa eli tappaa makrofageja eli syöjäsoluja, mutta nyt on vissiin tullut lähteitä jotka väittää että se on ihan mahtava aine ihmisiin ruiskutettavaksi. Ja kuulemma liikesalaisuuteen vedoten kaikkia mRNA-rokotteiden aineosia ei ole vaikkapa Pfizerin Comirnartyn tuoteselosteeseen laitettu ja muutenkinhan se tuoteseloste elää koko ajan eli sinne tuli mm. nuorten miesten sydänlihastulehduksesta varoittava teksti sen jälkeen, kun se oli kenttäkokemuksissa eli testeissä eli meissä kaikissa jotka piikitettyinä siihen testiin osallistumme, havaittu.
https://www.pnas.org/content/118/19/e2024998118
Intranasal vaccination with influenza HA/GO-PEI nanoparticles provides immune protection against homo- and heterologous strains
Chunhong Dong, Ye Wang, Gilbert X. Gonzalez, Yao Ma, Yufeng Song, Shelly Wang, Sang-Moo Kang, Richard W. Compans, and View ORCID ProfileBao-Zhong Wang
- aCenter for Inflammation, Immunity and Infection, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302;
- bDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
"Significance
A noninvasive intranasal (i.n.) influenza vaccine can induce mucosal immune responses in respiratory tracts, preventing infection at the portal of virus entry. However, the absence of appropriate mucosal adjuvants at present hinders the development of such a vaccine. Here, we developed polyethyleneimine-functionalized two-dimensional graphene oxide nanoparticles (GP) that showed high antigen-loading capacities and superior immunoenhancing properties. Robust and broadly reactive immune responses were induced with i.n. immunization with GP-HA nanoparticles, conferring protection against homologous and heterologous viruses. With versatility and flexibility, GP nanoparticles can be easily adapted for constructing mucosal vaccines of different respiratory pathogens."
Myrskyhiiri
Respected Leader
Tästä saa kuvan että lääkärit laittoivat potilaan kylmäksi eivätkä päästäneet pois sairaalasta vaikka potilas ja hänen lakimiehensä vaativat, jotta hieman vaihtoehtoista hoitotapaa kuin remdesivir:iä ja hengityskonetta tarjoava lääkäritiimi olisi päässyt hoitamaan potskua. Eikä ole kuulemma yksittäistapaus.
Foorumin lääkärit voinevat ottaa kantaa menikö tämä oikein ja onko tässä mitään huolestuttavaa, vai onko kohu ihan turhasta tehty.
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2021/09/killed-by-tyranny-veronica-wolskis-doctor-speaks-out/
Foorumin lääkärit voinevat ottaa kantaa menikö tämä oikein ja onko tässä mitään huolestuttavaa, vai onko kohu ihan turhasta tehty.
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2021/09/killed-by-tyranny-veronica-wolskis-doctor-speaks-out/