Mikoyan
Ylipäällikkö
Venäjällä on Intialle ainakin yksi varasuunnitelma, mikäli T50 kauppa kariutuu. Venäjä ja Intia kehittävät yhdessä par'aikaa, viidennen sukupolven ominaisuuksia hyödyntävää, Su35S Silent-versiota, joka mahdollisesti korvaa T50 kaupan;Tuossa juttua kuinka 11 miljardin T-50 (PAK FA) hankinta esitetään olevan köysissä. Ei tunnu vastaavan IAF:n odotuksiin niin mitenkään. Esim. stealth-ominaisuudet ovat täysin puheiden varassa, koska intialaisille ei ole annettu pääsyä testituloksiin. Moottorit tehottomia, aseiden integrointi kehnoa. Ongelmia kautta linjan.
Voi jäädä todella vähiin tuon ohjelman tilaukset. Venäläisille itselleen vain yksi lentue, joka nähdään merkittävänä osoituksena luottamuksen puutteesta. Intia saattaa nostaa kytkintä kokonaan.
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/video/...a-jet-deal-on-brink-of-collapse/1/555043.html
Tietenkin kyseessä voi olla perinteinen teknologiansiirtojen herutus vihjaillen oltavan lähellä tilannetta, jossa Intia ottaa takkinsa. Heillä ei ole suoranaista varasuunnitelmaa ja viime aikoina on lähinnä syntynyt sutta hankinnoissa. Silti tuo venäläisten oman rajauksen signaaliarvon merkitys on ehkä aliarvoitu maailmalla.
http://defence.pk/threads/russia-and-india-to-work-on-5th-gen-upgrade-to-su-35-fighter.406378/
"
Russia and India have signed an agreement to jointly develop a fifth-generation upgrade of the Su-35 Super Flanker multirole fighter, according to a report published March 8 on Virginia-based military affairs website Defense News.
The fighter will be a fifth-generation fighter like the US Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II, as opposed to the fourth-generation version of the Su-35 over which Russia and China are currently negotiating a deal.
The Su-35 Super Flanker will be unable to compete with other "genuine" fifth-generation fighters and China does not need to get caught up in a game of one-upmanship with India and Russia, said an expert cited by China's nationalistic tabloid Global Times.
Fifth-Generation Su-35S :
Defense News cited a Russian military insider as stating that Moscow and New Delhi have signed an agreement to design what Russia is calling the fifth-generation version of the Su-35 in India, which will see an Indian variant of the fighter created called the Su-35S. Sergey Chemezov, CEO of Russian state-run tech export corporation Rostec, was cited by the website as saying, "We have been negotiating and have signed the intention protocol for the Su-35...Now we are working on designing ideas for this contract and on creating a manufacturing platform for the aircraft of the fifth generation."
The shift from the fourth-generation Su-35, currently in service with the Russian Air Force, to the fifth-generation Su-35S will necessitate a large upgrade. The report in Defense News questioned the ability of the Su-35S to bear comparison with the F-35. An Indian Air Force official said Russia has pitched the Su-35S several times over the last six months, stating that it can replace the Indian Air Force's MiG-21 and MiG-27 fighters, set to be retired from service in seven to eight years.
Russia and India have already worked together on the development of a fifth-generation stealth fighter, the PAK FA T-50. The Defense News report suggested that the reason Russia has suddenly announced the development program for the stealth fighter is because they are trying to undercut France following the refusal of Paris to provide Russia with two Mistral-class amphibious assault ships. In 2012, New Delhi decided to buy 126 Dassault Rafale multirole fighters from the French company but they have been unable to reach a final agreement due to the technology transfer involved and the price. A Russian industry source cited in the report said the Su-35S will cost only US$85 million, very competitive when compared with the Rafale, and poses a threat to the deal between France and India. A report in the New Delhi-based Economic Times previously stated that India's air force command considers the Russian fighter and the Rafale to be complementary and that the former does not replace the need for the latter.
"
Viimeksi muokattu: