Panssarivaunut

https://www.janes.com/article/86319/ukraine-receives-upgraded-t-64s

The Ukrainian Army has received at least 100 upgraded T-64s from the Kharkiv Armour Plant since 2018, according to an 11 February Facebook post by Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko.

The post reads, "The best combat capabilities, modern thermal imagers, secure digital communications, satellite navigation, and new dynamic protection - all of this was gained by our tank crews thanks to the specialists of Ukrainian defence."

The vehicles are referred to as the T-64 2017 and enough of the upgraded tanks have been delivered to equip an entire brigade.

An 11 February press release from Ukrainian state enterprise UkrOboronProm explains that "the upgrade of the T-64 to the 2017 model allows a significant expansion of its combat capabilities, and the time required to integrate the new equipment allows it to be carried out during routine maintenance".

The press release also details how the vehicle is fitted with third-generation night vision equipment, which utilises existing fittings to minimise changes and reduce costs.

Furthermore, "the gunner's sighting system has an integrated thermal imager, which detects, identifies, and engages enemy 125 mm guns at any time of day and in all weather conditions." This appears to refer to the Russian T-72s used by separatist and Russian forces in eastern Ukraine.

Other improvements include a satellite navigation system from Orizon-Navigation integrated into a digital battle management system, as well as Lybid K-2RB digital radios with a range of 70 km supplied by Dolya & Co.

1550046168444.png
 

ctg

Ylipäällikkö
Twelve T-14 tanks and four T-16 armored recovery vehicles will be supplied to the troops by the end of the year, several Defense Ministry sources told the newspaper. The serial Armata differs from prototypes by some new units and systems. The first serial tanks will participate in the VE-Day parade and will then be tested by the troops. Sixteen vehicles will be sent to units deployed in various climatic zones. Uralvagonzavod (UVZ) Corporation told the newspaper it strictly observes the contract with the Defense Ministry to produce Armata tanks and combat vehicles.
https://www.armyrecognition.com/wea...main_battle_tanks_to_be_supplied_in_2019.html
 

krd

Ylipäällikkö
Lahjoittaja
ELSO 3.0
Kymmenesosa alkuun suunnitellusta tahdista. Näille jäi hyvä kappalehinta.
 
Hieno lähdekin kyllä.

"Experts compare the T-14 to foreign analogues and say it exceeds US Abrams, French Leclerc and German Leopard 2. The Russian tank is 25-30 percent more effective and has better survivability than adversary vehicles. The tank is equipped with Afganit reactive armor. It creates an impenetrable dome over the tank and automatically destroys approaching shells, bombs and missiles without crew participation."

Missään ei kerrota ketkä ekspertit on verrannut ja miten.
 

Leaderwolf

Ylipäällikkö
Lahjoittaja
Hieno lähdekin kyllä.

"Experts compare the T-14 to foreign analogues and say it exceeds US Abrams, French Leclerc and German Leopard 2. The Russian tank is 25-30 percent more effective and has better survivability than adversary vehicles. The tank is equipped with Afganit reactive armor. It creates an impenetrable dome over the tank and automatically destroys approaching shells, bombs and missiles without crew participation."

Missään ei kerrota ketkä ekspertit on verrannut ja miten.
Se on tuo salosen masa tuolta korsosta kun näin kertoi asian olevan. Joten näinhän sen täytyy sitten olla.
 
Hieno lähdekin kyllä.

"Experts compare the T-14 to foreign analogues and say it exceeds US Abrams, French Leclerc and German Leopard 2. The Russian tank is 25-30 percent more effective and has better survivability than adversary vehicles. The tank is equipped with Afganit reactive armor. It creates an impenetrable dome over the tank and automatically destroys approaching shells, bombs and missiles without crew participation."

Missään ei kerrota ketkä ekspertit on verrannut ja miten.
Ottaen huomioon, että T-14 edustaa kuitenkin 2000-luvun suunnittelua verrattuna 70/80 -lukuihin olisi ihmeellistä jos T-14 ei olisi pohjimmiltaan parempi vaunu jos (iso jos) järjestelmät toimivat. Kokonaan eri asia on, onko saavutettu suorituskykylisäys järjellinen suhteessa kustannuksiin. Itse veikkaisin että ei.
 
Ottaen huomioon, että T-14 edustaa kuitenkin 2000-luvun suunnittelua verrattuna 70/80 -lukuihin olisi ihmeellistä jos T-14 ei olisi pohjimmiltaan parempi vaunu jos (iso jos) järjestelmät toimivat. Kokonaan eri asia on, onko saavutettu suorituskykylisäys järjellinen suhteessa kustannuksiin. Itse veikkaisin että ei.
Tähän en ota edes kantaa vaan ihan vaan siihen, että kyllähän näissä pitäisi aina lähteet mainita että kuka väittää. Tuossa jutussa ei ollut muutenkaan viittauksia mihinkään, ihan kuin mielipideteksti.
 
Top