Trump -psykoosi

  • Viestiketjun aloittaja Viestiketjun aloittaja ak.tied
  • Aloitus PVM Aloitus PVM
Yhdysvalloissa on käynnistynyt kampanja BLEXIT (= Black Exit), liittyen mustien kansanliikkeeseen demokraateista lähtemiseksi. Näkevät, että demokraattien "ikuinen yhteiskuntasopimus", jossa mustat automaattisesti antavat äänensä ja demokraatit vastineeksi sosiaaliturvaa, ole tehnyt muuta kuin tuhoa mustissa yhteisöissä.

Noh. Entäs jos vaihtoehto onkin joku ihqa uusi -vasemmistoliike-, toki amerikkalaisessa kontekstissa? Joku latinovetoinen liike afroamerikkalaisten tumputtamana voisi edetäkin. Muita kuin valkoisia on amerikoissa vähän hitoikseen paljon.

-60-luvulla eräs afroam.pastori oli hiinä ja hiinä vähällä, ettei saanut jo liikkeeseen muutkin kuin mustaihoiset....luhtitalon parvekkeellehan se päättyi.

Niin kauan kahden puolueen valta säilyy, kun amerikkalaisten enemmistö keksii, että gamoon, eihän tää taida olla heidän etunsa mukaista....
 
https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10482433
Trump lupasi asekaupan tuovan 500 000 työpaikkaa, uutistoimisto tarkisti luvut – melkoinen ero
USA:n presidentti on sanonut, ettei halua perua Saudi-Arabian kanssa tehtyä asekauppaa, koska hänen mukaansa se tuo Yhdysvaltoihin valtavasti työpaikkoja.

Asiantuntija: Optimistisin arvio 168 000 työpaikkaa
Trumpin puheet puolesta miljoonasta uudesta työpaikasta ovat herättäneet hämmennystä myös viidessä suurimmassa asevalmistajassa, jotka työllistävät yhteensä 383 000 ihmistä.

Aika kannattavaa tuo business Saudien kanssa. Normaali business työllistää viidellä suurimmalla valmistajalla vähemmän kuin Trumpin mukaan kaupat Saudien kanssa tulisi/tulee työllistämään.
Kannattaa alkaa avaamaan rajoja että löytyy tarpeeksi ammattilaisia aseiden valmistukseen.
 
Viimeksi muokattu:
Trump kertoo että aikoo päättää syntymän myötä saatavan kansalaisuuden. Se tosin mainitaan 14 perustuslain lisäyksessä ja perustelut ettei se pitäisi paikaansa ovat lähellä voodoota.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...policy-congress-chain-migration-a8608316.html

Tässäkään ei päästä valheitta. Trump väittää että Yhdysvallat on ainoa maa jossa sellainen on. Tosiasiassa se on suhteellisen tavallinen molemmilla amerikan mantereilla.


863px-Jus_soli_world.svg.png


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_soli
 
Trump kertoo että aikoo päättää syntymän myötä saatavan kansalaisuuden. Se tosin mainitaan 14 perustuslain lisäyksessä ja perustelut ettei se pitäisi paikaansa ovat lähellä voodoota.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...policy-congress-chain-migration-a8608316.html

Tässäkään ei päästä valheitta. Trump väittää että Yhdysvallat on ainoa maa jossa sellainen on. Tosiasiassa se on suhteellisen tavallinen molemmilla amerikan mantereilla.


863px-Jus_soli_world.svg.png


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_soli
Perustuslain lisäykset eivät tuota Trumpille esteitä sillä hänen tärkein tietolähde "ne" sanovat että homman voi hoitaa presidentillisellä asetuksella (executive order). Ihme kyllä kukaan presidenteistä ei ole käyttänyt samaa kikkaa vaikkapa perustuslain 2. lisäyksen kumoamiseen.
WASHINGTON—President Trump is planning an executive order he says would terminate the automatic right to citizenship for children born in the U.S. to noncitizens, a move certain to provoke legal challenges and one that escalates his tough stance on immigrationahead of the midterm elections.

“It’s in the process. It’ll happen, with an executive order,” Mr. Trump said in an interview with Axios conducted Monday and made public this morning.

“We’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States,” Mr. Trump said. “It’s ridiculous. It’s ridiculous. And it has to end.”

In 2014, about 275,000 babies were born to unauthorized-immigrant parents, about 7% of the 4 million births that year, according to a Pew Research Center report on government data. Several countries around the world have some degree of birthright citizenship, or path to citizenship, including Canada and many Latin American countries.

Mr. Trump said he has discussed the issue with legal counsel: “It was always told to me that you needed a constitutional amendment. Guess what? You don’t.”

The White House didn’t provide further details of Mr. Trump’s plans.

“We will let you know when we have an announcement,” White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said.

Critics have long attacked the provision of the 14th Amendment, which states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

But Congress hasn’t moved to do away with the provision, and it would trigger a constitutional controversy if Mr. Trump were to attempt it on his own.

“You can definitely do it with an act of Congress. But now they’re saying I can do it just with an executive order,” Mr. Trump told Axios.

Mr. Trump as a presidential candidate raised the idea, driving a wedge among fellow Republican candidates.

Americans support birthright citizenship by about a 2-to-1 ratio, a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll from September 2017 found. In the survey, 65% said birthright citizenship should continue, while 30% agreed with the statement that the practice should end “so children of illegal immigrants are not automatically granted citizenship.”

The survey found a substantially higher level of support for birthright citizenship than it found in 2010, when 49% said the practice should continue and 46% backed ending it.

In the 2017 survey, more Republicans called for ending birthright citizenship than continuing it, by 52% to 42%. Independents and Democrats supported birthright citizenship by large margins.

Among Hispanics in the 2017 survey, 80% backed birthright citizenship, while 18% said the practice should be ended.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-...-end-birthright-citizenship-in-u-s-1540901506
 
Viimeksi muokattu:
Tässä haastattelu ja perusteluja puoleen ja vastaan

https://www.axios.com/trump-birthri...der-0cf4285a-16c6-48f2-a933-bd71fd72ea82.html

Exclusive: Trump targeting birthright citizenship with executive order

President Trump plans to sign an executive order that would remove the right to citizenship for babies of non-citizens and unauthorized immigrants born on U.S. soil, he said yesterday in an exclusive interview for "Axios on HBO," a new four-part documentary news series debuting on HBO this Sunday at 6:30 p.m. ET/PT.
Why it matters: This would be the most dramatic move yet in Trump's hardline immigration campaign, this time targeting "anchor babies" and "chain migration." And it will set off another stand-off with the courts, as Trump’s power to do this through executive action is debatable to say the least.
Show less
[Get more stories like this in our daily morning newsletter, Axios AM. Sign up here.]
Trump told "Axios on HBO" that he has run the idea of ending birthright citizenship by his counsel and plans to proceed with the highly controversial move, which certainly will face legal challenges.
  • "It was always told to me that you needed a constitutional amendment. Guess what? You don't," Trump said, declaring he can do it by executive order.
  • When told that's very much in dispute, Trump replied: "You can definitely do it with an Act of Congress. But now they're saying I can do it just with an executive order."
  • "We're the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States ... with all of those benefits," Trump continued. "It's ridiculous. It's ridiculous. And it has to end." (More than 30 countries, most in the Western Hemisphere, provide birthright citizenship.)
  • "It's in the process. It'll happen ... with an executive order."
The president expressed surprise that "Axios on HBO" knew about his secret plan: "I didn't think anybody knew that but me. I thought I was the only one. "
  • Behind the scenes: "Axios on HBO" had been working for weeks on a story on Trump’s plans for birthright citizenship, based on conversations with several sources, including one close to the White House Counsel’s office.
The legal challenges would force the courts to decide on a constitutional debate over the 14th Amendment, which says:
  • "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
Be smart: Few immigration and constitutional scholars believe it is within the president's power to change birthright citizenship, former U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services chief counsel Lynden Melmed tells Axios.
  • But some conservatives have argued that the 14th Amendment was only intended to provide citizenship to children born in the U.S. to lawful permanent residents — not to unauthorized immigrants or those on temporary visas.
  • John Eastman, a constitutional scholar and director of Chapman University's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, told "Axios on HBO" that the Constitution has been misapplied over the past 40 or so years. He says the line "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" originally referred to people with full, political allegiance to the U.S. — green card holders and citizens.
Michael Anton, a former national security official in the Trump administration, recently took up this argument in the Washington Post.
  • Anton said that Trump could, via executive order, "specify to federal agencies that the children of noncitizens are not citizens" simply because they were born on U.S. soil. (It’s not yet clear whether Trump will take this maximalist argument, though his previous rhetoric suggests there’s a good chance.)
  • But others — such as Judge James C. Ho, who was appointed by Trump to Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, in New Orleans — say the line in the amendment refers to the legal obligation to follow U.S. laws, which applies to all foreign visitors (except diplomats) and immigrants. He has written that changing how the 14th Amendment is applied would be "unconstitutional."
Between the lines: Until the 1960s, the 14th Amendment was never applied to undocumented or temporary immigrants, Eastman said.
  • Between 1980 and 2006, the number of births to unauthorized immigrants — which opponents of birthright citizenship call "anchor babies" — skyrocketed to a peak of 370,000, according to a 2016 study by Pew Research. It then declined slightly during and following the Great Recession.
  • The Supreme Court has already ruled that children born to immigrants who are legal permanent residents have citizenship. But those who claim the 14th Amendment should not apply to everyone point to the fact that there has been no ruling on a case specifically involving undocumented immigrants or those with temporary legal status.
The bottom line: If Trump follows through on the executive order, "the courts would have to weigh in in a way they haven't," Eastman said.
The full interview will air on "Axios on HBO" this Sunday, Nov. 4, at 6:30 p.m. ET/PT.
Go deeper:
 
Korkeimman oikeuden tuomio tarvitaan synnyttävistä laittomista siirtolaisista ja turisteista ja se tulee sieltä kyllä.

Näissä ne Kavikaisen ja kumppanien valinnat nousevat arvoonsa. Ja kun toinen pressa haluaa vastaavalla tavalla muuttaa vaikka aselakeja niin sama oikeusistuin toteaa että eieiei koska siihenhän tarvitaan ilman muuta perustuslain muutos.
 
Noh. Entäs jos vaihtoehto onkin joku ihqa uusi -vasemmistoliike-, toki amerikkalaisessa kontekstissa? Joku latinovetoinen liike afroamerikkalaisten tumputtamana voisi edetäkin. Muita kuin valkoisia on amerikoissa vähän hitoikseen paljon.

-60-luvulla eräs afroam.pastori oli hiinä ja hiinä vähällä, ettei saanut jo liikkeeseen muutkin kuin mustaihoiset....luhtitalon parvekkeellehan se päättyi.

Niin kauan kahden puolueen valta säilyy, kun amerikkalaisten enemmistö keksii, että gamoon, eihän tää taida olla heidän etunsa mukaista....

Blexit ja Brexit.

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osnovy_geopolitiki
Yhdysvalloissa on käynnistynyt kampanja BLEXIT (= Black Exit), liittyen mustien kansanliikkeeseen demokraateista lähtemiseksi. Näkevät, että demokraattien "ikuinen yhteiskuntasopimus", jossa mustat automaattisesti antavat äänensä ja demokraatit vastineeksi sosiaaliturvaa, ole tehnyt muuta kuin tuhoa mustissa yhteisöissä.

Nämä mustat katsovat ikään kuin karkaavansa rasististen demokraattien plantaasilta.

Blexit-väki ei automaattisesti sitoudu republikaaneihinkaan, vaan korostavat oikeutta itsenäiseen ajatteluun ja valintaan (mustasta) ihonväristä riippumatta. Ovat kuitenkin eri yhteyksissä varsin avoimesti kannattaneet Trumpia.

“I’ll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years,”
- President Lyndon B Johnson (D)

https://blexit.com/

Blexit ja Brexit. Molemmat ovat myös Osnovyn kirjassa.

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osnovy_geopolitiki
 
Joo kirjaan liittyen on myös maininta The book emphasizes that Russia must spread Anti-Americanism everywhere: "the main 'scapegoat' will be precisely the U.S."

Josta johtuen en ole tykännyt suomalaisenkaan median Trump-ulinasta vaikka presidenttinä on nyt tasoltaan mitä on. Siellä on aikanaan vapaat maalit ja presidentit vaihtuvat.

Täältä käsin kirjoittelemalla ja haukkumalla kyseistä presidenttiä tai moittimalla kymmmeniä miljoonia häntä äänestäneitä ei vaikuteta kyseiseen presidenttiin eikä politiikkaan.

Mutta vaikutetaan omaan kansaan.

ps. Dugin on bolshevikki, kun ketjussa ollut joskus juttua "bolshevisteista"
 
Viimeksi muokattu:
Olisin voinut maksaa tonnin jotta päästä näkemään Trumpin lähimpien avustajien mietteet tuossa tilnteessa.
 
  • Tykkää
Reactions: PSS
Erikoissyyttäjän toimisto on pyytänyt FBI:tä tutkimaan republikaaniaktivisti Jack Burkmanin toimia joka tarjosi rahaa naisille jotta nämä väittäisivät joutuneensa Robert Muellerin seksuaalisen ahdistelun kohteeksi. Burkman on mm. promonnut Seth Richin murhan salaliittoteoriaa ja yrittänyt saada lakia joka kieltäisi homoja pelaamasta NFL:ssä.
A company that appears to be run by a pro-Trump conspiracy theorist offered to pay women to make false claims against Special Counsel Robert Mueller in the days leading up to the midterm elections—and the special counsel’s office has asked the FBI to weigh in. “When we learned last week of allegations that women were offered money to make false claims about the Special Counsel, we immediately referred the matter to the FBI for investigation,” the Mueller spokesman Peter Carr told me in an email on Tuesday.

The special-counsel office’s attention to this scheme and its decision to release a rare statement about it indicates the seriousness with which the team is taking the purported plot to discredit Mueller in the middle of an ongoing investigation. Carr confirmed that the allegations were brought to the office’s attention by several journalists, who were contacted by a woman who identified herself as Lorraine Parsons. Another woman, Jennifer Taub, contacted Mueller's office earlier this month with similar information.

The woman identifying herself as Parsons told journalists in an email, a copy of which I obtained, that she had been offered roughly $20,000 by a man claiming to work for a firm called Surefire Intelligence—which had been hired by a GOP activist named Jack Burkman—“to make accusations of sexual misconduct and workplace harassment against Robert Mueller.”

Parsons wrote in her letter that she had worked for Mueller as a paralegal at the Pillsbury, Madison, and Sutro law firm in 1974, but that she “didn’t see” him much. “When I did see him, he was always very polite to me, and was never inappropriate,” she said. The law firm told me late on Tuesday afternoon, however, that it has “no record of this individual working for our firm.”
Parsons explained that she was contacted by a man “with a British accent” who wanted to ask her “a couple questions about Robert Mueller, whom I worked with when I was a paralegal for Pillsbury, Madison, and Sutro in 1974. I asked him who he was working for, and he told me his boss was some sort of politics guy in Washington named Jack Burkman. I reluctantly told [him] that I had only worked with Mr. Mueller for a short period of time, before leaving that firm to have my first son.”

She continued: “In more of an effort to get him to go away than anything else, I asked him what in the hell he wanted me to do. He said that we could not talk about it on the phone, and he asked me to download an app on my phone called Signal, which he said was more secure. Reluctantly, I downloaded the app and he called me on that app a few minutes later. He said (and I will never forget exactly what it was) ‘I want you to make accusations of sexual misconduct and workplace harassment against Robert Mueller, and I want you to sign a sworn affidavit to that effect.’” The man “offered to pay off all of my credit card debt, plus bring me a check for $20,000 if I would do” it, she wrote. “He knew exactly how much credit card debt I had, right down to the dollar, which sort of freaked me out.”
Surefire Intelligence was incorporated in Delaware less than three weeks ago, according to online records, and describes itself as “a private intel agency that designs and executes bespoke solutions for businesses and individuals who face complex business and litigation challenges.” Surefire’s domain records list an email for another pro-Trump conspiracy theorist, Jacob Wohl, who began hyping a “scandalous” Mueller story on Tuesday morning. Wohl told The Daily Beast that Burkman had hired Surefire to assist with his investigation into Mueller’s past, but denied knowing anything about the firm’s involvement in an alleged plot to fabricate allegations against Mueller when asked why his email address appeared in the domain records. He did not respond when asked by NBC why a telephone number listed on Surefire’s website referred callers to another number that’s listed in public records as belonging to Wohl’s mother.

Parsons was not willing to speak to the reporters by phone, according to Scott Stedman, one of the reporters who received the letter. So portions of her story have gone uncorroborated, and her identity has not been independently confirmed.

But she’s not the only woman who’s come forward: Jennifer Taub, a professor at Vermont Law School, received an email from a man using a Surefire Intelligence email address around the same time, on October 22. “It’s my understanding that you may have had some past encounters with Robert Mueller,” he told Taub, according to the email she forwarded to me on Tuesday afternoon. “I would like to discuss those encounters with you.” (Taub told me she has never had any encounters with Mueller, though she does appear on CNN at times as an expert commentator on the Mueller probe.)
“I believe a basic telephone call, for which I would compensate you at whatever rate you see fit (inside reason), would be a good place to start,” the man continued. “My organization is conducting an examination of Robert Mueller’s past. Tell me a decent method to contact you by telephone (or Signal, which would be ideal) and a beginning rate to talk with you about all encounters you’ve had with Special Counsel Mueller. We would likewise pay you for any references that you may have. Lastly, I would appreciate your discretion here, as this is a very sensitive matter.” Taub told me she forwarded the email to the special counsel’s office, noting that she did not plan to respond.

Around the time that Taub and Parsons say they began receiving these communications from Surefire, Burkman released a video on his Facebook page claiming, without evidence, that Mueller “has a whole lifetime history of harassing women.” On Tuesday, the day the special counsel’s office revealed that it had referred Parsons’s claims to the FBI, Burkman tweeted a similar allegation.
In an emailed statement, Burkman denied knowing Parsons and called the FBI referral “a joke, mueller wants to deflect attention from his sex assault troubles by attacking me.” He added in a separate email that “on Thursday 1200 NOON ROSSYLN HOLIDAY INN we will present a very credible witness who will allege that Mr. Mueller committed against her a sexual assault.” Mueller’s spokesman reiterated that the claims are false.

Burkman, a conservative radio host, is known for spreading conspiracy theories. He launched his own private investigation into the murder of the Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich, dangled uncorroborated claims of sexual harassment against a sitting member of Congress, and earlier this year offered $25,000 to FBI whistle-blowers for any information exposing wrongdoing during the 2016 election. He also promoted legislation that he authored—despite not being a member of Congress—that would ban gays from playing in the NFL. And he’s hosted two fund-raisers for Rick Gates—the former Trump-campaign official who was indicted by Mueller late last year.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...efers-scheme-targeting-mueller-to-fbi/574411/
 
On se mainio keke. :D Aika hyvin on kontrollerit miettiny hommat ja esiintyjät tähän näytökseen.
Nimenomaan, suurta teatteria kaikki, tarkoituksena valita puheenaiheet joista vaalien alla puhutaan.

Hyvin on toiminut!

Muistaako kukaan mm. enää kohu-uutista eräästä presidentistä, joka oli todennäköisesti syyllistynyt kymmenien ja satojen miljoonien veronkiertoon? En minäkään.
 

Miten Ameriikan presidentti voi olla noin kädetön?

Tuollainen voi tuntua oudolta jos ei koskaan tekemisissä poliitikkojen, diplomaattien tai vaikka ylempien upseerien kanssa.

Vähän veikkaan, että joku ilmavoimien stuertti saa kuulla aiheesta, "miten toimin kun potus tulee sisään koneeseen". Ja epäilen, että siinä Air Force One:n Chief Master Sergeant tekee selväksi, että niitä bajamajan tyhjentäjän hommia on kyllä vapaana vaikka Bagramissa.

Suomen ilmavoimissakin upseerit voi heittää lentorotsinsa kentällä kun poistuvat koneesta ja miehistön on silloin paras noukkia ne maasta ja varmistaa, että ne päätyvät siisteinä sinne minne herra upseeri haluaa niiden päätyvän ja se ei todellakaan sitten tarkoita, että rotsi on pölyssä ja rypyssä väärin aseteltuna!
 
Back
Top