Hanski
Ylipäällikkö
Julkaistujen tietojen perusteella Suomella on neljä patteriparia eli kahdeksan tuliyksikköä NASAMS:ja. Joka tapauksessa pieni määrä, jolla saadaan hyvä suojaus harvaan kohteeseen tai auttava vähän useampaan.
taantumu
Kenraali
Venäjän kansalliskaartin eversti tuomittiin seitsemäksi vuodeksi vankileirille sillä hänen hankkimansa tutkat eivät suojanneet Krimin siltaa riittävän hyvin.
https://tass.ru/proisshestviya/19741415
YK on ihan tarpeellinen moraalinen yhteistyöelin. Ei se mikään sotatoimija ole. Ja ehkä tuo rooli voisi hoitua pienemminkin puittein. On sillä joku merkitys kuitenkin kun äänestyksissä nähtiin esimerkiksi kuinka laajasti Venäjän hyökkäys tuomittiin.
On se joskus aiemmin ollut "sotatoimija". Se "toiminta" taisi tulla päätökseensä aika tarkalleen 2014, ja sen jälkeen eripura on estänyt kaikenlaisen "sotatoiminnan".
Esimerkiksi Libyan operaatio vuonna 2011 oli YK:n valtuuttama, ja Korean sodassa taas oli ihan YK:n omia joukkoja 1950-luvulla...
Fisu
Kenraali
Mikä ihmeen merkitys on moraalisella toimijalla? YK oli perustettu nimenomaan moraalisen toimijan korvaajaksi, jotta asiat ei jäisi vain moraalisen toiminnan tasolle. Venäjää kiinnostaa moraalitoiminta yhtä paljon kuin Natseja kiinnosti noottilaput. Kansainliitolla oli sentään munaa potkia epämoraalinen toimija pois moraalikerhosta, kun puolestaan YK:n on otettu mukaan myös kaikki moraalittomat toimijat ja annettu näiden määritellä moraali uudelleen. YK on muun muassa aktiivisesti rahoittanut Hamasin toimintaa ja siviilien indoktrinointia, eikä ole suostunut kuuntelemaan asiasta sanoneita, ennen kuin IDF kävi noukkimassa aseet, UN-liivit ja kirjanpidon Hamasin kätköistä.
-TripleX-
Ylipäällikkö
Kannattaa huomioida, oli niitä vaunuja sitten 350 tai 900 kpl niin ryssän hyökätessä liikkuvaa rintamaa oli yhtäkkiä melkein 2000 kilometriä. Se tekee tuon optimistisimman määrän kanssa jakaenkin vajaan vaunun per 2 kilometriä rintamaa. Todellinen on 1 per 4-5 km.
Sitten jakakaa meidän maarajan pituus käytössä olevilla vaunuilla ja puhutaan uudestaan valmistautumisesta.
Ei sotaan ole oikein koskaan kunnolla valmistautunut kuin se hyökkäävä osapuoli, aina ei sekään.
Ja mitä tulee sotilaallisen teollisuuden valmistautumattomuudesta niin sehän oli ryssien kätyreiden miehittämää. Vaikka asevoimat olisivat tilanneet mitä tahansa niin kaikkea jarrutettiin, kustannuksia paisutettiin sekä parhaimpia ideoita vesitettiin sekä varmasti vuodettiin ryssille. Sodan syttymisen jälkeen ensimmäinen vuosi meni puhdistaa noita pesäkkeitä mutta se oli paljon helpompaa siitä alkaen, koska oli sotalait käytössä ja ryssien kätyrit pystyi heittämään hiuksista putkaan heti kun todisteet oli selvät.
Ei ollut mitään "omia YK:n joukkoja". Ja silloin rysyt (NL) teki emämokan, jota katuivat eivätkä sen jälkeen ole tehneet samaa virhettä.
Yhdysvaltain presidentti Harry S. Truman oli antanut meri- ja ilmavoimille käskyn tukea Etelä-Korean joukkoja 26. kesäkuuta ja sama käsky annettiin maavoimille muutamaa päivää myöhemmin. Maa otti Korean asian esille myös Yhdistyneissä kansakunnissa, joka tuomitsi Pohjois-Korean sodan hyökkäävänä osapuolena.
Sotaan osallistui Yhdysvaltojen lisäksi puolitoista kymmentä YK:n jäsenmaata, tosin huomattavasti pienemmin joukoin.
Neuvostoliitto oli boikotoinut YK:n turvallisuusneuvoston kokouksia, vaikka se olisi veto-oikeudellaan voinut estää Koreaa koskevat esitykset.
rty19
Greatest Leader
Muuttaako tämän päivän suurvalloilla oleva tiedustelutoiminta tilannetta? Voiko suursota vielä alkaa yllättäen?
Antares
Respected Leader
Oleksandr Kovalenko (a military-political expert of the "Information Resistance" group) jutteli tällaista ryssän A-50U koneista, oletan että tässä lasketaan mukaan myös modernisoimattomat A-50 koneet (lihavointi alkuperäisen artikkelin):
"There are only 9 such planes in Russia. But 3 of them are actually inoperable : one of them is undergoing modernization which has not yet been fully completed, the others are in fact inoperable because they cannot be repaired," Kovalenko told the publication.
Thus, as the expert emphasizes, there are 6 such combat-capable aircraft in Russia, but even they have questions.
"Because one of the A-50 aircraft was hit by a drone in Belarus, it was evacuated from Belarus. At that time, the fuselage of the aircraft was not directly affected, namely its Bumblebee reconnaissance system. And today, Russia is unlikely to have the opportunity to quickly restore such complex systems. And in principle, the information that it was out of repair has not yet been received," Kovalenko reminds and adds that, mostly in the rotation format, a maximum of 5 A-50 aircraft were recorded in the airspace.
Note. In February 2023, it became known about the damage to the A-50 aircraft by drones at the airfield in Machulyshchy in Belarus. Later, he flew to Taganrog for repairs.
-
Tästä on ollut hieman epäselvyyttä eli montako näitä koneita heillä on? Military Balance 2023 mukaan 7 kpl A-50U ja 3 kpl A-50, mutta saivat yhden A-50U modernisoinnin valmiiksi vuonna 2023.
Toisaalta olen nähnyt muitakin arvioita, pienestä määrästä kuitenkin kyse.
Tämä kohta erityisesti kiinnitti minun huomion:
Kovalenko reminds and adds that, mostly in the rotation format, a maximum of 5 A-50 aircraft were recorded in the airspace
Eli tarkoittaako hän että 5 kpl A-50U koneita olisi ollut ilmassa yhtäaikaa, Ukrainan rajoilla? Näin minä tuon lauseen käännän, tosin koneiden pienestä määrästä johtuen toinen tulkinta voisi olla että tämä on maksimimäärä yhtä aikaa käytössä olleita koneita eli montako on havaittu aktiivikäytössä yhtä aikaa. Pidän tätäkin mahdollisena tulkintana, koneiden pienestä määrästä johtuen ja huomioiden että luulisi ainakin yhden tai kahden olevan joko huollettavana tai kalibroitavana melkein mihin aikaan tahansa.
-
Tässä koko artikkelin teksti (RBC-Ukraina artikkeli julkaistu 15.1.2024): LÄHDE
"There are only 9 such planes in Russia. But 3 of them are actually inoperable : one of them is undergoing modernization which has not yet been fully completed, the others are in fact inoperable because they cannot be repaired," Kovalenko told the publication.
Thus, as the expert emphasizes, there are 6 such combat-capable aircraft in Russia, but even they have questions.
"Because one of the A-50 aircraft was hit by a drone in Belarus, it was evacuated from Belarus. At that time, the fuselage of the aircraft was not directly affected, namely its Bumblebee reconnaissance system. And today, Russia is unlikely to have the opportunity to quickly restore such complex systems. And in principle, the information that it was out of repair has not yet been received," Kovalenko reminds and adds that, mostly in the rotation format, a maximum of 5 A-50 aircraft were recorded in the airspace.
Note. In February 2023, it became known about the damage to the A-50 aircraft by drones at the airfield in Machulyshchy in Belarus. Later, he flew to Taganrog for repairs.
-
Tästä on ollut hieman epäselvyyttä eli montako näitä koneita heillä on? Military Balance 2023 mukaan 7 kpl A-50U ja 3 kpl A-50, mutta saivat yhden A-50U modernisoinnin valmiiksi vuonna 2023.
Toisaalta olen nähnyt muitakin arvioita, pienestä määrästä kuitenkin kyse.
Tämä kohta erityisesti kiinnitti minun huomion:
Kovalenko reminds and adds that, mostly in the rotation format, a maximum of 5 A-50 aircraft were recorded in the airspace
Eli tarkoittaako hän että 5 kpl A-50U koneita olisi ollut ilmassa yhtäaikaa, Ukrainan rajoilla? Näin minä tuon lauseen käännän, tosin koneiden pienestä määrästä johtuen toinen tulkinta voisi olla että tämä on maksimimäärä yhtä aikaa käytössä olleita koneita eli montako on havaittu aktiivikäytössä yhtä aikaa. Pidän tätäkin mahdollisena tulkintana, koneiden pienestä määrästä johtuen ja huomioiden että luulisi ainakin yhden tai kahden olevan joko huollettavana tai kalibroitavana melkein mihin aikaan tahansa.
-
Tässä koko artikkelin teksti (RBC-Ukraina artikkeli julkaistu 15.1.2024): LÄHDE
https://www.rbc.ua/rus/news/takih-rosiyi-vsogo-9-ale-vsi-robochi-ekspert-1705316790.html
UAINRU
Photo: Ukraine shot down an expensive and important A-50 reconnaissance aircraft for the Russian Federation (wikipedia.org)
AUTHOR: MARIA KUCHERYAVETS
EXPERT: OLEKSANDR KOVALENKO
Soldiers of the Air Force of the Ukrainian Armed Forces managed to destroy the Russian A-50 long-range radar detection and control aircraft, which is capable of conducting reconnaissance and targeting targets for strikes. In total, the aggressor country may have 9 A-50 units, but not all of them are combat-capable.
Oleksandr Kovalenko , a military-political expert of the "Information Resistance" group, told in detail why the destruction of the A-50 is important and what makes this operation unique .
During the preparation of the material, we used: data from our own sources in the Defense Forces, an exclusive expert comment, the Telegram channel of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny, and messages from the Center for Strategic Communications and Information Security.
"There are only 9 such planes in Russia. But 3 of them are actually inoperable : one of them is undergoing modernization which has not yet been fully completed, the others are in fact inoperable because they cannot be repaired," Kovalenko told the publication.
Thus, as the expert emphasizes, there are 6 such combat-capable aircraft in Russia, but even they have questions.
"Because one of the A-50 aircraft was hit by a drone in Belarus, it was evacuated from Belarus. At that time, the fuselage of the aircraft was not directly affected, namely its Bumblebee reconnaissance system. And today, Russia is unlikely to have the opportunity to quickly restore such complex systems. And in principle, the information that it was out of repair has not yet been received," Kovalenko reminds and adds that, mostly in the rotation format, a maximum of 5 A-50 aircraft were recorded in the airspace.
Note. In February 2023, it became known about the damage to the A-50 aircraft by drones at the airfield in Machulyshchy in Belarus. Later, he flew to Taganrog for repairs.
"It is very expensive in itself, its price is almost 400 million dollars. But taking into account the fact that A-50s are not produced now and each of them is unique, they make this aircraft even more expensive for Russians," Kovalenko emphasizes.
According to him, such a loss for the Russian Federation means that it has significantly fewer opportunities to conduct intelligence activities in the airspace of Ukraine.
"Not only will they have less information about the presence of Ukrainian tactical aircraft and not only in the airspace, but also they will not be able to reorient their tactical aircraft and air defense equipment," says Kovalenko.
The expert calls the destruction of the A-50 a sufficiently painful, serious, expensive and reputational loss for the aggressor country.
"Because the IL-22 was damaged together with the A-50. And in fact, this is a unique case in the world history of wars and conflicts, when two aircraft of this level and such functionality are destroyed or damaged at the same time. This is a unique case. Never before in history it wasn't," Kovalenko emphasizes.
At the same time, such a plane was shot down yesterday. In particular, expert Kovalenko, in a conversation with the publication, also agreed that so far there have been no cases of the downing of the Russian A-50. And so it happened for the first time.
In turn, the Center for Strategic Communications notes that the A-50 is a very complex and specific piece of equipment. And according to the Center, there are up to 20 of them in the arsenal of the Russian Federation.
They also drew attention to the fact that Il-22M11 is a protected air control post that operated together with A-50 during enemy air attacks against Ukraine, this is also the second such loss by Russia during the war. Because the first such board was shot down by fighters of the "Wagner" PMK during the rebellion of Yevgeny Prigozhin in the summer of last year.
In conclusion, it is worth noting that the destruction and disabling of these aircraft is a great success of the Defense Forces of Ukraine, which will facilitate the fight against enemy aggression in the air.
As the source told the publication, the A-50 was shot down immediately after it went on duty in the Kyrylivka area around 21:10-21:15 on January 14. The A-50 disappeared from radars and stopped responding to requests from tactical aviation, and later the pilot of the Su-30 PKS of the Russian Federation detected ignition and the fall of an unidentified aircraft.
The Il-22M11 aircraft was on duty in the Strilkovo area, and was eventually shot down along the coast of the Sea of Azov at around 9 p.m. on January 14. After the defeat, as RBC-Ukraine learned from radio intercepts received from sources , the IL-22M pilot asked the airfield controller in Anapa to call an ambulance and firefighters to the runway.
Already today, information about the destruction of the Russian A-50 radar aircraft and Il-22 air control center was confirmed by the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny. He called it a perfectly planned operation in the Azov region.
In addition, the destruction of the A-50 was also confirmed by the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Kyrylo Budanov. But he did not go into details.
There are only 9 such in Russia, but not all of them are working. The expert explained the importance of destroying the A-50
KYIV, MONDAY, JANUARY 15, 2024, 1:06 P.MUAINRU
Photo: Ukraine shot down an expensive and important A-50 reconnaissance aircraft for the Russian Federation (wikipedia.org)
AUTHOR: MARIA KUCHERYAVETS
EXPERT: OLEKSANDR KOVALENKO
Soldiers of the Air Force of the Ukrainian Armed Forces managed to destroy the Russian A-50 long-range radar detection and control aircraft, which is capable of conducting reconnaissance and targeting targets for strikes. In total, the aggressor country may have 9 A-50 units, but not all of them are combat-capable.
Oleksandr Kovalenko , a military-political expert of the "Information Resistance" group, told in detail why the destruction of the A-50 is important and what makes this operation unique .
During the preparation of the material, we used: data from our own sources in the Defense Forces, an exclusive expert comment, the Telegram channel of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny, and messages from the Center for Strategic Communications and Information Security.
What kind of plane is this and how many of them does Russia have
A-50 is a long-range radar surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft. As the expert explained, such planes are used to carry out reconnaissance activities in the airspace. Also, the A-50 is used for targeting for tactical aviation and can even be used to improve the characteristics of air defense capabilities, increasing the ability to target, fix, observe, and destroy targets at a distance."There are only 9 such planes in Russia. But 3 of them are actually inoperable : one of them is undergoing modernization which has not yet been fully completed, the others are in fact inoperable because they cannot be repaired," Kovalenko told the publication.
Thus, as the expert emphasizes, there are 6 such combat-capable aircraft in Russia, but even they have questions.
"Because one of the A-50 aircraft was hit by a drone in Belarus, it was evacuated from Belarus. At that time, the fuselage of the aircraft was not directly affected, namely its Bumblebee reconnaissance system. And today, Russia is unlikely to have the opportunity to quickly restore such complex systems. And in principle, the information that it was out of repair has not yet been received," Kovalenko reminds and adds that, mostly in the rotation format, a maximum of 5 A-50 aircraft were recorded in the airspace.
Note. In February 2023, it became known about the damage to the A-50 aircraft by drones at the airfield in Machulyshchy in Belarus. Later, he flew to Taganrog for repairs.
How important is the destruction of the A-50
The expert explains that, in general, Russia cannot currently produce such aircraft."It is very expensive in itself, its price is almost 400 million dollars. But taking into account the fact that A-50s are not produced now and each of them is unique, they make this aircraft even more expensive for Russians," Kovalenko emphasizes.
According to him, such a loss for the Russian Federation means that it has significantly fewer opportunities to conduct intelligence activities in the airspace of Ukraine.
"Not only will they have less information about the presence of Ukrainian tactical aircraft and not only in the airspace, but also they will not be able to reorient their tactical aircraft and air defense equipment," says Kovalenko.
The expert calls the destruction of the A-50 a sufficiently painful, serious, expensive and reputational loss for the aggressor country.
"Because the IL-22 was damaged together with the A-50. And in fact, this is a unique case in the world history of wars and conflicts, when two aircraft of this level and such functionality are destroyed or damaged at the same time. This is a unique case. Never before in history it wasn't," Kovalenko emphasizes.
The second loss for Russia
According to the Center for Strategic Communications and Information Security, this is currently the second loss or damage of an A-50. As we have already indicated above, such a plane was disabled by Belarusian partisans at the airfield in Machulyshchy.At the same time, such a plane was shot down yesterday. In particular, expert Kovalenko, in a conversation with the publication, also agreed that so far there have been no cases of the downing of the Russian A-50. And so it happened for the first time.
In turn, the Center for Strategic Communications notes that the A-50 is a very complex and specific piece of equipment. And according to the Center, there are up to 20 of them in the arsenal of the Russian Federation.
They also drew attention to the fact that Il-22M11 is a protected air control post that operated together with A-50 during enemy air attacks against Ukraine, this is also the second such loss by Russia during the war. Because the first such board was shot down by fighters of the "Wagner" PMK during the rebellion of Yevgeny Prigozhin in the summer of last year.
In conclusion, it is worth noting that the destruction and disabling of these aircraft is a great success of the Defense Forces of Ukraine, which will facilitate the fight against enemy aggression in the air.
Destruction of the A-50 and Il-22: how it happened
We will remind, late in the evening of January 14, RBC-Ukraine sources in the Defense Forces reported the downing of a Russian A-50 aircraft by the Air Force and the downing of an Il-22M11 (flight number 75106).As the source told the publication, the A-50 was shot down immediately after it went on duty in the Kyrylivka area around 21:10-21:15 on January 14. The A-50 disappeared from radars and stopped responding to requests from tactical aviation, and later the pilot of the Su-30 PKS of the Russian Federation detected ignition and the fall of an unidentified aircraft.
The Il-22M11 aircraft was on duty in the Strilkovo area, and was eventually shot down along the coast of the Sea of Azov at around 9 p.m. on January 14. After the defeat, as RBC-Ukraine learned from radio intercepts received from sources , the IL-22M pilot asked the airfield controller in Anapa to call an ambulance and firefighters to the runway.
Already today, information about the destruction of the Russian A-50 radar aircraft and Il-22 air control center was confirmed by the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny. He called it a perfectly planned operation in the Azov region.
In addition, the destruction of the A-50 was also confirmed by the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Kyrylo Budanov. But he did not go into details.
Antares
Respected Leader
Ei kenties "yllättäen", koska joukkojen ja materiaalien siirtäminen rajoille vie puoli vuotta tai vuoden - kuten nähtiin Ukrainan tapauksessa. Tosin itse kallistuisin enemmän kuuden kuukauden suuntaan ja vielä viimeisen kahden kuukauden aikanakin tapahtui merkittäviä joukkojen ja kaluston siirtoja.
Silti, mitä ehtii puolustautuva osapuoli tekemään puolessa vuodessa? Kertauttamaan joukkoja, aktivoimaan kalustoa varastoista, kaivautumaan ja linnoittamaan ja miinoittamaan sekä kenties saamaan lento- ja merirahtina apua kumppanimailta (jos onnistuu vakuuttamaan ne ajoissa aidosta hädästä ja tarpeesta - ja jos niissä maissa on sopuisasti suhtautuvat päättävät tahot sekä kalustoa varastoissa mitä antaa).
Sanoisin että melko pitkälti puolustautuva maa on sen voiman varassa, mitä itseltä sattuu löytymään reserveistä ja kalustoa varastoista. Toki sama koskee hyökkääjää mutta ryssän tapauksessa kaikkea on (perinteisesti) ollut varastoissa paljon.
Toisaalta puolustautuvan maan olisi pitänyt kyetä pitämään naapuria silmällä eli mikä määrä kalustoa modernisoidaan ja valmistetaan per vuosi. Kuinka monta panssariprikaatia ja mekanisoitua joukkoa on täysin varustettu ja perustetaanko uusia. Entä risteilyohjukset, ballistiset ohjukset, dronet yms. kalusto, paljonko niitä arvioidaan olevan varastoissa ja montako valmistuu per vuosi.
Ryssän tapauksessa ongelma on siinä että pinta-alaltaan suuren maan sopisikin olettaa ylläpitävän suurehkoja ilmavoimia, suurehkoja panssarijoukkoja yms. eli kaikkea tarvitaan ja paljon. Ennen Ukrainaan hyökkäämistä moni ajattelikin että kaikki tämä tarvitaan pitkien rajojen takia, mutta kuten nähtiin, ryssä heittikin koko voiman yhdellä kertaa Ukrainaa vastaan. Eli tämän voi katsoa edustavan monen analyysin pahinta mahdollista skenaariota, kenties sellaista johon moni maa ei varautunut koska ryssän ei kuviteltu toimivan näin (koska täytyyhän niille muille rajoille jättää vähintään rajanturvajoukot - tai kenties näin suuri joukkojen käyttö tapahtuisi vain monia maita sisältävässä suursodassa jolloin esim. Suomi olisi kyseisen sodan yksi rintama eikä Suomea vastaan voisi keskittää kaikkea voimaa).
Eli suursota ei ala siten että hyökkäävät suoraan kasarmialueilta, mutta toisaalta joukkojen keskittämiseen voi katsoa menevän puoli vuotta tai vuosi. Suursotaan valmistavan voiman rakentaminen vie sitten kauemmin, jos ei satu olemaan valtaisia varastoja jo valmiiksi. Niiden rakentaminen tulisi havaita hyvissäajoin, jos seurataan oikeita mittareita (se perinteisen vakoilun rooli).
Viimeksi muokattu:
ido59
Majuri
oli jo.
---
Hyväksikäytän siis palstatilan UA-pravdan juttuun: Parliament supports creation of electronic register for conscripts.
---
Hyväksikäytän siis palstatilan UA-pravdan juttuun: Parliament supports creation of electronic register for conscripts.
Verkhovna rada on valmistelemassa lakia, joka mahdollistaa kutsunta- ja palvelusrekisterin perustamisen ja sitä varten tietojen yhdistelyn muista valtiollisista rekistereistä. Sellaista ei siis ilmeisesti vielä ole 
Viimeksi muokattu:
tulikomento
Supreme Leader
Just tulin itse makoisista saunan löylyistä. Teki terää työpäivän päätteeksi. Näin talvipakkasilla meinaan.
Tykinruokaa
Luutnantti
Ihmeen vähän näistä ryssän lämmitys ongelmista on uutista missään mediassa. Eikö haluta kertoa kuinka örkkilän asukkaat kärsii muustakin kuin korkeasta inflaatiosta ja munapulasta?
Viimeksi muokattu:
Antares
Respected Leader
Siellä on ollut ns. pukki kaalimaan vartijana:
Russian government and officials turned out to be the owners of the largest egg factories, with the price of their products increased by 60%, — Russian Forbes.
Five of the twelve largest egg producers in Russia are managed by state structures, as well as current or former officials. This is stated in the Forbes analysis, which covers the largest poultry farms with production of 600 million eggs in 2022.
️The leader of the list is JSC Poultry farm Sinyavinskaya is owned by 94.5% by Sberbank. The bank became the owner of the factory in 2017. Entering the top three, OJSC Volganin has been managed by Lyudmila Kosteva, a member of the regional political council of the United Russia party in the Yaroslavl region, since 1996. By 2015 she became not only the CEO but also the owner of the enterprise: by 2015 Kosteva bought up all 100% of its capital.
️OJSC Sverdlovskaya Poultry Farm is directly owned by the state.
️The agricultural holding Komos Group, which in addition to eggs produces dairy products and pork, is equally owned by Andrey Shutov and Andrey Oskolkov, former deputies of the State Council of Udmurtia from the United Russia party. Oskolkov was deputy chairman of the republic's government in the early 2000s.
️Leonid Sedov, the head of the Seimovskaya poultry farm, spent four years in the 2000s as Minister of Agriculture of the Nizhny Novgorod Region. Now he controls more than 90% of the shares of the enterprise.
Egg prices soared by 61.4% in 2023 and continued to grow in the new year. Even Putin had to comment on the situation and redirected the question to Agriculture Minister Dmitry Patrushev. The latter promised to improve: "I felt that it is necessary to work better <...> I hope that in the near future, at the beginning of the year, the price should go down".
But it hasn't.
Russian government and officials turned out to be the owners of the largest egg factories, with the price of their products increased by 60%, — Russian Forbes.
Five of the twelve largest egg producers in Russia are managed by state structures, as well as current or former officials. This is stated in the Forbes analysis, which covers the largest poultry farms with production of 600 million eggs in 2022.
️The leader of the list is JSC Poultry farm Sinyavinskaya is owned by 94.5% by Sberbank. The bank became the owner of the factory in 2017. Entering the top three, OJSC Volganin has been managed by Lyudmila Kosteva, a member of the regional political council of the United Russia party in the Yaroslavl region, since 1996. By 2015 she became not only the CEO but also the owner of the enterprise: by 2015 Kosteva bought up all 100% of its capital. ️OJSC Sverdlovskaya Poultry Farm is directly owned by the state.️The agricultural holding Komos Group, which in addition to eggs produces dairy products and pork, is equally owned by Andrey Shutov and Andrey Oskolkov, former deputies of the State Council of Udmurtia from the United Russia party. Oskolkov was deputy chairman of the republic's government in the early 2000s. ️Leonid Sedov, the head of the Seimovskaya poultry farm, spent four years in the 2000s as Minister of Agriculture of the Nizhny Novgorod Region. Now he controls more than 90% of the shares of the enterprise. Egg prices soared by 61.4% in 2023 and continued to grow in the new year. Even Putin had to comment on the situation and redirected the question to Agriculture Minister Dmitry Patrushev. The latter promised to improve: "I felt that it is necessary to work better <...> I hope that in the near future, at the beginning of the year, the price should go down".
But it hasn't.